1 / 13

Forward Luminosity Calorimeter Technologies

Forward Luminosity Calorimeter Technologies. SiW - Silicon-tungsten sampling calorimeter (current Si tech) Quartz Fiber – Cerenkov longitudinal sampling (CMS HF) Gas Cerenkov – Cerenkov longitudinal sampling (new) Parallel Plate Avalanche Ch – gas sampling (current)

ilar
Download Presentation

Forward Luminosity Calorimeter Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forward Luminosity Calorimeter Technologies SiW - Silicon-tungsten sampling calorimeter(current Si tech) Quartz Fiber – Cerenkov longitudinal sampling (CMS HF) Gas Cerenkov – Cerenkov longitudinal sampling (new) Parallel Plate Avalanche Ch – gas sampling (current) PbWO4 – Continuous scintillating (CMS ECAL) John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  2. The Problem • Bunch crossing 1.4 ns • Radiation dose ~100 MRad/y • Pairs produced / crossing ~ 200 TeV <E> ~ 4 GeV <x,y> ~ several cms • Must see 250 GeV Bhabha e+e- • Must veto 2-gamma background events John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  3. Si-W: layers Si ..mm W ..mm(M.Breidenbach, T.Maruyama, …) • Known technology • fine granularity • well simulated and understood Strengths Weaknesses • Si may be radiation-soft • electron-hole drift is slow • recovery time long John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  4. SiW fig John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  5. SiW dose John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  6. Quartz Fiber Calorimetry(Onel, Winn) • Well understood (CMS-HF) • Fast and rad hard Strengths Weaknesses • Time spread of signal ~1 ns (almost OK) • Rad Hardness ~1 GRad (almost OK) John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  7. John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  8. CMS-HF Quartz fiber understanding John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  9. Quartz Transmission vs. Dose & Dose Rate Ray Thomas, Texas Tech University – using an electron accelerator ray.thomas@ttu.edu John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  10. John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  11. Gas Cerenkov John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  12. Parallel Plate Avalanche Chamber • Positive ions too slow ~ micro sec John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

  13. PbWO4 Crystals • CMS ECAL … scary numbers of rad h hardness … John Hauptman, Linear Collider Meeting, Paris, 19-23 April 2004

More Related