1 / 48

Image Resolution

Image Resolution. Chapter 10. Definitions. Resolution – ability to record and display detail Spatial Spectral Radiometric. Definitions. Spatial resolution – the amount of geometric detail How close can two points be before you can’t distinguish them. Spatial Resolution.

herman
Download Presentation

Image Resolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Image Resolution Chapter 10

  2. Definitions • Resolution – ability to record and display detail • Spatial • Spectral • Radiometric

  3. Definitions • Spatial resolution – the amount of geometric detail • How close can two points be before you can’t distinguish them

  4. Spatial Resolution • High spatial resolution: 0.6 - 4 m • » GeoEye-1 • » WorldView-2 • » WorldView-1 • » QuickBird • » IKONOS • » FORMOSAT-2 • » ALOS • » CARTOSAT-1 • » SPOT-5 • Medium spatial resolution: 4 - 30 m • » ASTER • » LANDSAT 7 • » CBERS-2 • Low spatial resolution: 30 - > 1000 m • SeaWiFS • GOES

  5. Radiometric Resolution • Radiometric resolution – the amount of brightness detail • Is the image black and white, shades of grey • How many bits – 4, 8, 12, 16, etc.

  6. Radiometric Resolution

  7. 6 bit 8 bit

  8. 2 bit 1 bit

  9. 2-bit 8-bit

  10. Spectral Resolution • Spectral resolution – the amount of detail in wavelength • 2 bands, 4, 6, 200 or more

  11. Temporal Resolution • Temporal resolution – the amount of detail in time • High altitude aerial photos every 10 years, Landsat 16 days, NOAA 4 hrs • High resolution: < 24 hours - 3 days • Medium resolution: 4 - 16 days • Low resolution: > 16 days

  12. Tradeoffs

  13. Tradeoffs • There are trade-offs between spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution • Taken into consideration when engineers design a sensor. • For high spatial resolution, the sensor has to have a small IFOV (Instantaneous Field of View). • However, this reduces the amount of energy that can be detected as the area of the ground resolution cell within the IFOV becomes smaller. • This leads to reduced radiometric resolution - the ability to detect fine energy differences.

  14. Tradeoffs • To increase the amount of energy detected (and the radiometric resolution) without reducing spatial resolution, we have to broaden the wavelength range detected for a particular channel or band. • Unfortunately, this reduces the spectral resolution of the sensor. • Conversely, coarser spatial resolution would allow improved radiometric and/or spectral resolution. • Thus, these three types of resolution must be balanced against the desired capabilities and objectives of the sensor.

  15. Target Variables • Contrast – the brightness difference between an object and the background • High contrast improves spatial detail

  16. Contrast versus spatial frequency Sinusoidal target with varying contrast in % and varying spatial frequency left to right Obvious resolution decrease from left to right. If your eyes are too good squint to see effect Picture from www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html

  17. Target Variables • Shape is also a significant factor • Aspect ratio is how long the object is compared to its width • Long thin features can be seen even if they are narrower than the spatial resolution • Regularity of shape makes for better detail • Agricultural fields

  18. Target Variables • Number of objects favor higher detail • Orchard versus single tree • Extent and uniformity of background also helps distinguish things

  19. Aerial view of Olympic Peninsula facing west from Port Orchard Bay

  20. System Variables • Design of sensor and its operation are important too • Air photo – have to consider quality of camera and lens, choice of film, altitude, scale,

  21. Operating conditions • Altitude • Ground speed • Atmospheric conditions

  22. Measuring resolution • Ground Resolved Distance (GRD) the dimensions of the smallest objects recorded • Line pairs per millimeter (LPM) is derived from targets • Target is placed on the ground and imaged • If two obejcts are are visually separated, they are considered “spatially resolved”

  23. Measuring resolution • Using the target you measure the smallest pair of lines (black line plus adjacent white space)

  24. Modulation Transfer Function • The Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is response of a system to an array of elements with varying spaces

  25. Modulation Transfer Function • For low spatial frequencies, the modulation transfer function is close to 1 (or 100%) • generally falls as the spatial frequency increases until it reaches zero. • The contrast values are lower for higher spatial frequencies . • As spatial frequency increases, the MTF curve falls until it reaches zero. • This is the limit of resolution for a given optical system or the so called cut off frequency (see figure below). • When the contrast value reaches zero, the image becomes a uniform shade of grey.

  26. Modulation Transfer Function

  27. Modulation Transfer Function • The figure represents a sine pattern (pure frequencies) with spatial frequencies from 2 to 200 cycles (line pairs) per mm. • The top half of the sine pattern has uniform contrast.

  28. Modulation Transfer Function • Perceived image sharpness (NOT lp/mm resolution) is closely related to the spatial frequency where MTF is 50% (0.5) • i.e. where contrast has dropped by half.

  29. Modulation Transfer Function • Contrast levels from 100% to 2% are illustrated on the chart for a variable frequency sine pattern. • Contrast is moderately attenuated for MTF = 50% and severely attenuated for MTF = 10%. • The 2% pattern is visible only because viewing conditions are favorable: • it is surrounded by neutral gray, it is noiseless (grainless), and the display contrast for CRTs and most LCD displays is relatively high. • It could easily become invisible under less favorable conditions.

  30. Modulation Transfer Function • How is MTF related to lines per millimeter resolution? • The old resolution measurement— distinguishable lp/mm— corresponds roughly to spatial frequencies where MTF is between 5% and 2% (0.05 to 0.02). • This number varies with the observer, most of whom stretch it as far as they can. • An MTF of 9% is implied in the definition of the Rayleigh diffraction limit.

  31. Mixed Pixels • If the area covered by a pixel is not uniform in composition it leads to mixed pixels. • These often occur at the edge of large parcels, along linear features, or scattered due to small features in the landscape (ponds, buildings, vehicles, etc.)

  32. Mixed Pixels

  33. Mixed Pixels • The spectral responses of those mixed pixels is not a pure signature, but rather, a composite signature • Can you think of an advantage to having a composite signature? • Identify areas that are too complex to resolve individually

  34. There have been a number of studies on the effect of resolution on mixed pixels • As resolution becomes coarser • Mixed pixels increase • Interior pixels decrease • Background pixels decrease

  35. Resolution and Mixed Pixels

  36. Original Landsat image Image resampled at coarser resolution wheat (red), potatoes (green) and sugar beet (blue)

  37. Spatial and Radiometric Resolution • Sensors are designed with specific levels of radiometric resolution and spatial resolution • Both of these determine the ability to portray features in the landscape • Broad levels of resolution may be adequate for coarse-textured landscape • Finer resolution may help to identify more features, but may also add more detail than necessary

  38. Interactions with Landscape • In a study of field size in grain-producing regions, Podwysocki (1976) showed how effectiveness of different resolutions could be quantified.

  39. Interactions with Landscape • Simonett and Coiner (1971) conducted another study to determine the effectiveness of the yet to be launched MSS sensor • Simulated by using airphotos and overlaying a grid of 800, 400, 200, and 100 feet. • Assessed the number of land-use categories in each cell

More Related