1 / 20

Leaving the Lindens Teaching in Virtual Worlds of Other Providers

Leaving the Lindens Teaching in Virtual Worlds of Other Providers. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire Dept. Computer Science and Technology http://perisic.com/marc. 20/08/2014 10:01:17. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire. 1. Outline of the Talk.

havily
Download Presentation

Leaving the Lindens Teaching in Virtual Worlds of Other Providers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leaving the LindensTeaching in Virtual Worlds of Other Providers • Marc Conrad • University of Bedfordshire • Dept. Computer Science and Technology • http://perisic.com/marc 20/08/2014 10:01:17 Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire 1

  2. Outline of the Talk • Outline (this slide) • History (why?) • Solutions (what?) • Framework (how?) • Evaluation (was it good?) • Conclusion & Discussion (so what?) Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  3. History • September 2010: it became clear that our SL University Island would not be available for the forthcoming Academic Year. • Three classes were meant to use it: • Project Management, Undergraduate • start October 2010. • Linden Scripting Language • start November 2010. • Project Management, Postgraduate • start February 2011. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  4. Solution 1“getting on without it” • Project Management, Undergraduate • “The artefacts will be presented and accessible within a showcase (that you have to develop) in the multi user virtual environment Second Life using the shared media feature of the Second Life viewer 2.0.” • Changed to: • “The artefacts will be presented and accessible within suitable Web 2.0 applications.” Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  5. Solution 2“OSgrid” • For the LSL class an OpenSim island has been rented for three months from Dreamland Metaverse. • The task: ”Demonstrate an understanding of events and states. You have to build one or more objects in the ‘Open Bedfordia’ island on the OSgrid containing scripts that use LSL events. […]” • This island is part of the OSgrid. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  6. Solution 3“Dedicated Provider” • For the Project Management, Postgraduate class, Reaction Gridhas been used as an alternative to SL. • The task: “An educational showcase about the technology in a virtual world. Land will be provided at the ‘New Bedfordia’ island at ReactionGrid.” Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  7. Solution 4“Sim on a stick” • Provides a whole virtual world on a USB stick. Was considered for the LSL class. • Not implemented. Possibly too complicated for students. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  8. Solution 5“Institutional VW host” • Host a virtual world on a university server (with OpenSim technology). • Not implemented. Possibly too complicated for staff. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  9. Our Solution Space(for assignments in Virtual Worlds) • (SL) Second Life • (DP) Dedicated Provider, not Second Life • (OG) OSgrid Island via Provider • (IH) Institutional Host • (SH) Student Hosts (Sim-on-a-Stick) • (WI) Getting on Without It Question: which one is best? Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  10. Answer (to the question: which one is best?) • That’s a stupid question • Problem: • What exactly means ‘best’? • ‘Best’ in which way? • Define ‘best’! Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  11. Develop Framework (for Evaluation of Virtual Worlds) • Evaluate Virtual Worlds in a systematic way. • Consider the two pairs of antipodes: • World vs. Individual • perspective • Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic • to the virtual world Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  12. These antipodes define four dimensions... Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  13. Strategy • Evaluate the six solutions (SL, DP, OG, IH, SH, WI) against the four dimensions • Cost (extrinsic, individual) • Persistence (extrinsic, world) • Context (intrinsic, world) • Immersion (intrinsic, individual) Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  14. Persistence (extrinsic, world) How long will it last? • SL: “the end is near” (since 2009) • But not really. Maybe too big to fail. • DP, OG, IH: Possibility for backups with .oar files. Therefore contents not necessarily dependent provider(?). • OG: Can remain within Grid with different provider. • SH: Persistence is problem of students and falls into ‘lost work’ context. • WI: Problem still persists! Group project needs common repository / backup. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  15. Cost (extrinsic, individual) How much does it cost me? • SL: high monetary cost (setup fee, monthly fee). • DP, OG: much cheaper! Providers offer consultancy. DP: monopoly for building stuff?! • IH, SH: no procurement costs but time to be invested within institution. Might become costly? • WI: as an institution it might be good to have a stake in Virtual World’s to be attractive to students. Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  16. Context (intrinsic, world)What’s going on in the (virtual) world? • SL: Lots of context. Still. • DP: Some context but it doesn’t play a significant role. • OG: More and more context. Some of it is ‘adult’. • IH: no context (but could be created) • SH: no a priori context (could be provided) • WI: need to use ‘real world’ context. Is that any more useful? Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  17. Immersion (intrinsic, individual)How much am I part of this world? • SL: oh yes! • DP: oh no… • OG: Maybe… • IH: as part of student experience? • SH: Certainly not (unless…) • WI: how much immersion do we actually need? Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  18. Summarypseudo-quantitative representation of previous slides. Cost (cheapness) Persistence SL DP OG IH WI SH DP SL OG IH SH WI Immersion Context DP SL OG IH SH WI DP SL OG IH SH WI Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  19. Discussion: How much Immersion and Context do we actually need? • Depends on the context of the task. • LSL class – possibly not much immersion necessary. But consider teaching ‘embedded software’ using LSL. The embedded code drives ‘objects’ that are somewhat more ‘real’ then the LSL code. • Project Management: How much immersion do we need to believe this is a ‘real’ project we are doing. Is it a real project nevertheless? • What about yourstudent task??? What do you expect from your virtual world to deliver? Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

  20. Conclusion • From the intrinsic perspective (immersion, context) SL is still ‘best’. • From the extrinsic perspective there are very good alternatives. • Apply to your ‘virtual world’ project: • How much ‘world’ do you actually need? Or is ‘virtual’ good enough? Marc Conrad University of Bedfordshire

More Related