1 / 14

‘Progressing a Family Support Promotion of Welfare Agenda in the 21 st Century’

‘Progressing a Family Support Promotion of Welfare Agenda in the 21 st Century’. Colm O’Doherty Institute of Technology, Tralee. The Legal Context. 1991 Child Care Act Continium of Service:

hart
Download Presentation

‘Progressing a Family Support Promotion of Welfare Agenda in the 21 st Century’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ‘Progressing a Family Support Promotion of Welfare Agenda in the 21st Century’ Colm O’Doherty Institute of Technology, Tralee

  2. The Legal Context • 1991 Child Care Act • Continium of Service: • Health boards have a duty to promote the welfare of children who are not receiving adequate care and protection • Provide childcare and family support services • Questions and issues arising from the Irish states’ family support narrative

  3. Personal – Professional Experiences • 1975 – Coventry Social Services • 1984 – 1993 – Southern Health Board

  4. Policy Context • A Family policy continium • Promotion of welfare in a post-traditional order: • Changing work practices • Changes in intimate life • Erosion of traditional authority base of parents

  5. Policy Context (2) • Irish social policy orientation • Welfarism or Social Justice • Ambiguous policy structures

  6. Practice Context • Narrow operational focus of Irish statutory social work • Failure to implement Task Force (1980) recommendations • Uneasy relationship with community work • Sharp increase in social workers workloads’

  7. Organisational Context • Medical model • Deployment of social workers • Social workers ‘hedge their bets’

  8. Research • A dearth of macro-level research available on the Irish statutory family support system • Objectives of research study: • Map out national family support policy and practice • Set the agenda • Situate the Irish system within the international field of family support • Devise a new model

  9. Research (2) - Methodology • National and International documentary analysis • Social work survey • Interviews with childcare managers • Survey/focus group - voluntary agencies

  10. Findings • Low response rate to social work survey: • 49 completed questionnaires returned out of a total of 250 sent to social workers • Social workers dissatisfaction with the failure of their boards to fully embrace family support work

  11. Findings (2) • 16 guided interviews with childcare managers • Date analyzed under 4 headings: • Conceptual framework • Policy framework • Training & practice framework • Resources and priorities

  12. Findings (3) • Survey of voluntary agencies • Focus group • Partners or Agents of the board?

  13. Recommendations • Adoption of a community social work framework for practice • Linking family support development with the generation of Social Capital • Appointment of policy making family support managers

  14. New Model Process: Contacts Devising/supporting Networks Practice Methods: Early Intervention Ecological Approach Practice Principles: Community Approach Partnership Outcomes: Life Politics Democratic Family Active Citizenship Social Capital

More Related