1 / 22

Criminal Law: Substance and Procedure

Chapter 4. Criminal Law: Substance and Procedure. Substantive and Procedural Law. Substantive Criminal Law: A body of specific rules that declares what conduct is criminal and prescribes the punishment to be imposed for such conduct Procedural Law:

gur
Download Presentation

Criminal Law: Substance and Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 4 Criminal Law: Substance and Procedure

  2. Substantive and Procedural Law • Substantive Criminal Law: • A body of specific rules that declares what conduct is criminal and prescribes the punishment to be imposed for such conduct • Procedural Law: • The rules that define the operation of criminal proceedings, from obtaining a warrant or making an arrest through trial, sentencing and appeal

  3. Historical Development of the Criminal Law • Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (2000 B.C.) • Mosaic Code of the Israelites (1200 B.C.) • Roman Twelve Tables (451 B.C.) • Corpus Juris Civilis (6th Century) • French Civil Code • Early Anglo-Saxon societies • wergild (monetary compensation) for criminal violations • guilt was determined by two methods: • compurgation • trial by ordeal

  4. The Common Law Legal Tradition • After the Norman conquest of England, the common law tradition develops • Judges have the power to “interpret” acts according to customs, traditions and previous legal decisions • Stare Decisis: • To stand by decided cases; the legal principle by which the decision or holding in an earlier case becomes the standard by which subsequent similar cases are judged

  5. Civil vs. Criminal Law • Civil Law: • All law that is not criminal, including tort, contract, personal property, maritime and commercial law • Tort Law: • The law of personal wrongs and damage; includes negligence, libel, slander, assault, and trespass

  6. Sources of the Criminal Law • Common law, statutes and case decisions • Administrative rules and regulations • Constitutional laws

  7. Classifying Crime – Two Primary Groups • Group I • Felony - A more serious crime that carries a penalty of incarceration in a state or federal prison usually for one year or more • Misdemeanor - A less serious crime usually punishable by a fine or incarceration in a local jail for less than one year • Violations • Group II – other statutory classifications such as: • Juvenile delinquency • Sex-offender categories • Multiple or first offender classifications

  8. Legal Definition of Crime • A legal wrong • Prohibited by the criminal law • Prosecuted by the state in a formal court proceeding in which a criminal sanction or sentence may be imposed

  9. Guilty Mind and Guilty Act • Mens Rea: A guilty mind; the intent to commit a criminal act • The intent to do an act • Knowledge of circumstances that make the act a criminal offense • Actus Reus: An illegal act, or failure to act, when legally required

  10. Strict Liability Crime • A criminal violation (usually one that endangers the public welfare) that is defined by the act itself, irrespective of intent • Examples include things like speeding and serving alcohol to a minor because he/she looked older

  11. Criminal Defenses • Individuals defend themselves against criminal charges by refuting one or more elements of the case. For example, they can refute the: • Actus reus – claiming not to have committed the behavior • Mens rea – claiming not to have the necessary mental intent for the act • Justification – a defense that admits the criminal act but maintains that the act was justified because of necessity, duress, self-defense or entrapment • Ignorance or Mistake – as a general rule ignorance is not an excuse; however, in limited cases the court has recognized it as a defense • Insanity – a defense to a criminal prosecution in which the defendant’s state of mind negates his or her criminal responsibility

  12. Criticisms of the Insanity Defense • Spurs crime • Releases criminal offenders • Requires extensive use of expert testimony • Commits more criminals to mental institutions than prisons

  13. Other Defenses • Intoxication – Voluntary intoxication as a general rule is not considered a defense. However, involuntary intoxication caused by mistake or duress may be accepted as a defense. • Age – Common law established minimum age limits for a reliable presumption of culpability. Today, state statutes have specified age limits. The general trend is to lower the minimum age at which criminal responsibility is presumed capable.

  14. Entrapment • A legal defense that maintains the police originated the criminal idea or initiated the criminal action

  15. Substantive Criminal Law Reform • An effort has been made by the federal and state governments to update legal codes so that they may accurately reflect: • Public opinion • Social change • Technological innovation • Other important social issues

  16. Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights • Procedural law consists of the rules and procedures that govern the pretrial processing of criminal suspects and the conduct of criminal trials. • First ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution • Purpose is to prevent government from usurping the personal freedom of citizens • Applied to state actions through the use of the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment

  17. Key Constitutional Protections: The Fourth Amendment • The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

  18. Key Constitutional Protections: The Fifth Amendment • No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless of a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; not shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; not shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

  19. Key Constitutional Protections: The Sixth Amendment • In all criminal proceedings, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense • (The above excerpts from amendments modernize spelling/capitalization, but retain outdated punctuation.)

  20. Key Constitutional Protections: The Eighth Amendment • Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

  21. Incorporation Theory • A view that all the provisions of the Bill of Rights are included in the 14th Amendment and are therefore applicable in state proceedings • Selective incorporation holds that provisions of the Bill of Rights must be applied to states on a case-by-case basis

  22. The Meaning of Due Process • Justice Felix Frankfurter emphasized the definition of due process in Rochin v. California (1952): “Due process of law requires an evaluation based on a disinterested inquiry pursued in the spirit of science on a balanced order of facts, exactly and clearly stated, on the detached consideration of conflicting claims . . . on a judgment not ad hoc and episodic but duly mindful of reconciling the needs both of continuity and of change in a progressive society.”

More Related