1 / 18

Accuracy of Wind Fields in Convective and Stratiform Echoes Observed by a Bistatic Doppler Radar Network

This study investigates the accuracy of wind fields derived from a bistatic Doppler radar network using actual observation data. The elimination of sidelobe contamination and a practical composite method for the network are also discussed.

gordonr
Download Presentation

Accuracy of Wind Fields in Convective and Stratiform Echoes Observed by a Bistatic Doppler Radar Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P4.12 Accuracy of Wind Fields in Convective and Stratiform Echoes Observed by a Bistatic Doppler Radar Network *1 *2 Shinsuke Satoh and Joshua Wurman Communications Research Laboratory, Japan School of Meteorology,University of Oklahoma *1 *2 NCAR SPOL RADAR BISTATIC ANTENNA

  2. Problems The mathematical accuracy of the bistatic network has not been yet examined. Most of the previous studies dealt with small area analysis. Objectives The accuracy of wind fields derived from a bistatic Doppler network is investigated based on a mathematical examination, and is evaluated using actual observation data. Also, elimination of sidelobe contamination and a practical composite method for bistatic multiple-Doppler radar network will be discussed. Data observed in Kansas during CASES-97 05/19/97, 0300-1120GMT convective echo, SPOL and one bistatic site (NO) only 05/30/97, 0200-0300GMT stratiform echo, SPOL and three bistatic sites (NO, CE, SO) EL angles: 0.5, 1.0, 1.4, 2.4, 3.4 deg

  3. (x,y,z) R1 /2 /2 R2 (xB,yB,zB) (0,0,0) BL Bistatic Doppler velocity V

  4. Measured bistatic Doppler velocity actual V apparent Va R1 /2 /2 R2 (xB,yB,zB) (0,0,0) BL (cos(/2)-1: velocity expansion factor

  5. Dual-Doppler velocity synthesis

  6. Vol.Exp.Factor: 1/cos2(/2) BIST-dual MONO-dual Ratio of Std. Deviation  (degree) Variance of synthesized horizontal winds BISTATIC-dual Assuming 1=2, BIST dual range (40-150deg) Min.(100deg) MONO dual range (30-150deg) Min.(90deg)

  7. R1 R1 R = C / cos2(/2) A’ R Rcos(/2) R R2’ A  R sin() R1· R2 R1  R1· T/R R R Rcos(/2)  R1 R2 R1· R1· R sin() T/R R Bistatic resolution volume

  8. i=0 sin2 E-Vector  Bistatic radar equation The bistatic resolution volume is calculated using Gaussian shape for the transmitting beam pattern as follows, A bistatic radar equation is expressed by where G1 and G2 are antenna gain of transmitter and receiver, respectively. Ae is the effective area of the receiver. i is the total of the individual oblique-scattering cross-section areas in a unit volume. Inserting the sample volume V, Therefore the so-called range-correction term should be expressed by 20log[R2cos(/2)], instead of 20logR1 in a well-known monostatic radar equation. sin2(85deg)=0.99 sin2(80deg)=0.97 sin2(75deg)=0.93

  9. Minimum detectable reflectivity

  10. Z V1 V V2 Y RADAR-2 RADAR-1 X Z V1 V V2 Y RADAR-2 RADAR-1 X Z V1 BIST Rx V V2 Y BIST Rx RADAR-1 X BIST Rx Difference of observation time Monostatic dual-Doppler (1) Volume scan: time difference = 0 ~ 300 sec Storm motion: 20 m/s 20 m/s  150 s = 3000 m (2) COPLAN: time difference = 0 ~ 20 sec Bistatic dual-Doppler (3) Bistatic: time difference = 0

  11. Sidelobe and multiple scattering contamination Multiple scattering echo Sidelobe echoes Strong echo may cause multiple and sidelobe scattering. These abnormal scattering will disappear due to time-integration of bistatic Ze. The distribution of enough time-average Ze indicates the bistatic antenna pattern. Subtract averaged BIST-Ze from averaged SPOL-Ze Estimated Bist Ant. Pattern If the corrected reflectivity (BIST-Ze + Ant-Pattern) is larger than monostatic reflectivity (SPOL-Ze), the bistatic data is probably abnormal scattering.

  12. Bistatic antenna pattern

  13. Three pairs of dual-Doppler analysis

  14. Variational Method in over-determined cases Continuity equation as a strong constraint Observed winds from dual-Doppler pairs as weak constraints In the case of low elevation angles ignoring vertical components, where 12 = 22 = 1 is assumed.

  15. Composite wind vectors using variational method

  16. Comparison among three pairs of dual-Doppler analysis

  17. CONCLUSIONS (1) The standard deviation of the synthesized horizontal wind vectors is less than three times of observed Doppler velocities within a range of 40 <  < 150 degree. The minimum error appears at  100 degree. (2) The accurate bistatic radar equation including the bistatic resolution volume, the polarization scattering angle, and the estimated antenna-pattern leads to the right bistatic reflectivity and the minimum detectable reflectivity. (3) The sidelobe contamination can be eliminated using the difference between the transmitting radar reflectivity and the corrected bistatic reflectivity. (4) In strong (convective) echoes, the sidelobe contamination is the prime cause of the wind error. In week (stratiform) echoes, the minimum detectable power dominates the wind accuracy.

More Related