1 / 17

Role of Convective Events in Wind Design

Role of Convective Events in Wind Design. Franklin T. Lombardo University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign National Wind Technology Center Uncertainty and Risk in the Design Process for Wind July 12, 2016. Introduction.

cai
Download Presentation

Role of Convective Events in Wind Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Role of Convective Events in Wind Design Franklin T. Lombardo University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign National Wind Technology Center Uncertainty and Risk in the Design Process for Wind July 12, 2016

  2. Introduction • Windstorms (e.g., hurricane, thunderstorm, nor’easter, tornado) cause most loss of any natural hazard in the U.S. (NOAA) - ~80% damage due to convective events (thunderstorm, tornado) in 2014. • Perhaps surprisingly, relatively little is known about these types of events any how they affect structures – not explicitly designed for in codes and standards (incl. IEC) – same problems continue Damage Mitigation Loss Resistance • Thunderstorm and tornado wind fields affect each link of the chain differently than is currently assumed (and hence the risk) – uncertainty propagates through each link of the chain

  3. Wind Design Needs • Improved classification of atmospheric conditions • Better reflection of actual site-specific, location-based conditions (stability, turbulence, wind shear) • Estimation of load conditions (single turbine, large wind plants) • Resistance and target reliability and associated risk with cognizance of cost • All of these steps (or links) come with some measure of uncertainty • Improvements Needed: measurement capabilities, probabilistic models, physical models

  4. For tornadoes and thunderstorms, occurrence is relatively rare but cause a disproportionate amount of damage • Limited full-scale data – much is unknown and uncertainties are large – especially close to the surface • Probabilistic and physical differences than what is prescribed for design (and hence uncertainty and associated risk) Wind Design Challenges

  5. Probabilistic Characterization - Thunderstorm • Percent annual maxima from thunderstorm (non-tropical)  3-s gust (surface data set) • Need to classify by storm type Highest recorded gust ~37 m/s (10m) from thunderstorm (“valid outlier”) • Thunderstorms dominate frequency and/or magnitude for a lot of U.S.

  6. Probabilistic Characterization - Thunderstorm Location Uncertainty Single Station Uncertainty Akin to γL for same load, β will different

  7. Probabilistic Characterization - Thunderstorm • When fit to GEV (c = 0 or c = c, thunderstorms display more variability) • ~ 800 U.S. surface stations (mainly airports)  location uncertainty “Tail Behavior” “Dispersion” • Approximate resolution of airport-based surface stations

  8. Leads to the belief that these “outliers” are more common than previously thought (risk assessments are incorrect) • Could be the “design” events associated with Vref • What are the physical characteristics? Physical Characterization - Thunderstorm SWERF 10 m tower – Rantoul, IL (since June 2nd) – will measure loading

  9. TTU 50 m, 200 m tower – Lubbock, TX Physical Characterization - Thunderstorm Eight (8) ramp-up events • How do we convert this information to Vref (e.g., hub height, 10 min - can’t use theory) • How do gust structure, turbulence compare to IEC “extreme” conditions? Do they change by location (site-specific)? • How do these events load structures differently?

  10. Risk is generally assumed low – left out codes and standards • Recent events have challenged that thinking (e.g., Joplin, 2011). • Two major issues here with respect to wind plants • Plant risk > ‘point’ (damage area) risk (analysis is currently done) • Many areas where plants reside suffer from low population density (hence low damage indicator density) – tornadoes hard to “rate” Probabilistic Characterization - Tornado

  11. If at some point, tornadoes are included partially or fully – need to understand physical characteristics • Very few records available – October 6, 2010 in Arizona Physical Characterization - Tornado • Sonic anemometer at 2.5 m AGL • Peak wind speed – 83 m/s

  12. Arizona record has very unique aspects that likely will “load” a structure differently (will challenge current wind design): • Rapid changes in wind speed and direction (> 70 m/s2 acceleration) • Significant vertical component (±20-25 m/s @ 2.5 m) • Possibly due to multiple vortices Physical Characterization - Tornado

  13. Climate Change • Convective events can’t be simulated in models • “Crude” downscaling using large-scale climate projections • Above: Modification of extreme value pdf • Right: Uncertainty in present (black) and future (gray) climate for n-year MRI

  14. Convective Events Overview (Thunderstorm, Tornado) • Cause most wind damage annually • Rare by nature; not measured or understood adequately for wind loading • Need to address in wind design • Convective Events Conclusions • Probabilistic and physical nature different than currently assumed in wind design, literature • Clear location-based differences • Likely to induce different loading than prescribed • Significant uncertainties in estimation – what is a “design event”? • More measurements, models needed Conclusions/Future Work

  15. How do we estimate Vref at a wind plant site with short records (1-4 yr.) from on-site met mast where thunderstorm-generated winds may dominate? • Combination of surface stations and reanalysis data (“extend” time series) • Develop probability distribution of observed thunderstorm events correlate to large-scale parameters (e.g., wind shear, instability)) Dual Characterization - Thunderstorm

  16. Multi-Hazard Analysis (Wind-Ice) R~500 yr.

More Related