1 / 24

Chapter 6

Chapter 6. Reviewing the Literature. Learning Objectives. Explain the purposes of the literature review Describe the elements of the review Conduct a literature search Write a literature review . What is the Literature Review?.

gordon
Download Presentation

Chapter 6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 6 Reviewing the Literature

  2. Learning Objectives • Explain the purposes of the literature review • Describe the elements of the review • Conduct a literature search • Write a literature review

  3. What is the Literature Review? • A summarized document that describes and critiques the past and present state of information about a certain topic

  4. Importance of the Review • Link between existing knowledge and the problem of interest • Places the current study in the scientific method for understanding the problem of interest • Informed procedure for refining the research method • Helps assure that the current study will truly make a contribution to the specific field

  5. Conducting the Review • Locate relevant studies • Select relevant studies • Organize relevant studies • Summarize the relevant content of the studies

  6. Locating the Relevant Studies • Strive to be as thorough as possible and appropriate • Consider published and unpublished studies • Search a variety of sources

  7. Sources of Information • Books • Advantages • Efficient source for a lot of information • Theories, methodologies, measures, background information such as pathophysiology of medical conditions • List of the book’s references can be used as a starting point for branching bibliographies (one source cites a source to inspect, which cites another source to inspect, and so on) • Disadvantage • Not usually timely or current

  8. Sources of Information (cont.) • Journal Articles • Primary Source - original research-based studies published in a peer reviewed journals • Secondary Source - review articles summarize the existing knowledge on a particular topic based on extensive literature searches • Advantage • Timely current information • Disadvantage • Questionable quality if journal is not peer-reviewed

  9. Sources of Information (cont.) • Databases • Searchable organized collection of research results • Bibliographic Databases • Most common type in medical research • Contains information on books, reports, citations, abstracts, and either full text articles or a links to the full text • PubMed is popular database for medical research • Citation Databases • Facilitate the tracking of all published research that has been done to date on a particular research topic • ISI Web of Knowledge is one of the most popular citation database • Synthesized Databases • Pre-filtered records for particular research topics • Access mostly by subscription and relatively expensive • Cochran Collaboration, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and UpToDate are popular examples

  10. Filtering Out the Irrelevant • Careful choice of keywords • Target population of the study: youth, hospital patients, immigrants • Study methodology: case-control, randomized controlled trial, ethnography • Exposure or risk factor: obesity, low socioeconomic status, living near a nuclear power plant • Outcome: diabetes, alcohol abuse, pancreatic cancer • Specific measures: BMI, stress, zip codes • Analytic strategy: life table, logistic regression, content analysis

  11. Filtering Out the Irrelevant (cont.) • Necessary parameters for inclusion • Use these as keywords to start • Examples • Only recently published articles • Only randomized controlled trials • Only studies in the U.S. • Only older adults

  12. Selecting Relevant Studies • As part of the search, review the results • Title • Abstract • Main Headings • Obtain full-text articles of those that seem relevant • Some full-texts are available through the search engine • Most are available through a university library

  13. Organize Relevant Studies • Several different methods • Tabular form is useful • An example follows

  14. Tabular Organization

  15. Tabular Organization (cont.) • Each row is a study • “Study” column identifies which study is being summarized for reference to the original article • “Methodology” column summarizes important features of the study design • “Strengths” indicate the relevance of the study • “Weaknesses” suggest what the new study might add • Other potentially useful columns • Purpose of the study • Specifically what this study will contribute to the new one

  16. Summarize the Relevant Content • Introduction • Define the topic • State the purpose • Present the significance • Body of the Review • Summary and analysis of the studies • Conclusion • “Lesson” learned from the review • Relevant contribution of the new study

  17. Body of the Review • Organized by Theme • Typical organization for research studies • Organized by Historical Time • Time that the studies took place or period under study • Organized by Study Design/Methodology • For example, experimental and non-experimental • Organized by Type of Target Population • For example, various age groups, stages of disease

  18. Thematic Organization • Components of a conceptual picture of the overall results of the studies • Can be illustrated in an outline format

  19. Example Outline Format • Diabetes Mellitus • Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents • Epidemiology • Diagnosis • Associated Factors • Relationship to obesity • Other risk factors: puberty, ethnicity, gender, hypertension, metabolic syndrome • Treatment of Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents • Assessment of control in diabetes • Definition of control • Glycemic control • Lipid management • Determinants of diabetes control • Socio-demographic factors • Biomedical factors • Self-care behaviors • Medications • Home diabetes status monitoring • Exercise • Diet • Weight control • Education

  20. Example Outline (cont.) • Themes for example outline of diabetes • Description and justification of the problem • Control Strategies • Risk Factors

  21. Summarize the Relevant Content of the Studies • Thematic review of literature focuses on a theme and, in a succinct manner, cites multiple studies to document important findings under each theme • Major results of the studies are summarized rather than the details about each study • Typically report a particular finding and cite multiple references in parentheses after

  22. Example Thematic Review Significance of the problem: “Case studies in Ohio, South Carolina and a few other states have shown increasing percentages of incident pediatric cases of diagnosed diabetes, with fewer than 4% reported before 1990s and up to 45% in recent studies (Pinhas-Hamiel et al., 1996; Willi et al., 1997; Fagot-Campagna et al., 2000). Risk factors: Those believed to be at greatest risk are minority children (Native, African, and Mexican-Americans) who are obese, inactive, and genetically predisposed to the development of Type 2 diabetes (Dabelea et al., 1999).”

  23. Citations and References • Statements that are not common knowledge should be cited • Results of studies are an example of statements that always should be cited • Styles most often used in epidemiology • American Medical Association (AMA) • American Psychological Association (APA)

  24. Tips for Preparing the Review • make the review reasonably exhaustive, • include only relevant studies, • use recent studies as appropriate, • analyze as well as summarize the studies, • organize the summary in some meaningful way, typically by themes, and • emphasize the path from results of prior studies to the potential contribution of the present study.

More Related