1 / 14

Ethics Panel Discussion/Debate – Summative

Ethics Panel Discussion/Debate – Summative. Critical Thinking Skill: Moral Judgment Learning Goal: I can use ethical guidelines to develop a position on a social issue of importance. This is an individual summative.

gloria
Download Presentation

Ethics Panel Discussion/Debate – Summative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ethics Panel Discussion/Debate – Summative Critical Thinking Skill: Moral Judgment Learning Goal: I can use ethical guidelines to develop a position on a social issue of importance

  2. This is an individual summative. • You must be prepared to discuss your article with your group on the assigned date. • Your completed questions must be word-processed and submitted the following day after the group discussion. • You are encouraged to take notes during the group discussion. • DO NOT WRITE ON OR DAMAGE THE ARTICLE – you will have to replace it. • Articles can be found on-line, links are at the end of this PPT

  3. Moral Dilemma: • Should researchers be allowed to run unethical experiments if they benefit our understanding of human behaviour and health? • Is it morally right to use the information gained by unethical experiments in our society?

  4. Preparation for the Ethics Panel Discussion and Debate: • Read the assigned article based on a social science experiment that has been criticized for being unethical. • Answer the following questions based on your reading. Use the subtitles provided. These will be word processed and handed in as part of your completed summative.

  5. (K/U) Background Questions: • What do you think was their research question? – (Main point of their experiment) • Who were the test subjects? Who was conducting the experiment? • What were the methods they used in the experiment? • What were the issues/criticisms by outside sources? • Explain which specific sections of the Psychology and Sociology Code of Ethics were violated.

  6. (T/I) Moral Judgment: • What were the negative consequences of the experiment? • What were the benefits of the experiment to society? (i.e. understanding of a specific human behaviour, medical advancements, behaviour modification techniques…). Be specific. • What is your personal opinion of the moral dilemma related to your assigned experiment? (Answer the 2 questions in the box)

  7. (APP) Current Day Connection: • (Complete outside research to answer the following question – source all work, use any proper format you choose - APA format preferably): • Find a recent article/issue that can be connected to the experiment. This can be follow up to the original experiment, or it can be an article that applies information/theories that came from the experiment.

  8. (COMM) Discussion Questions and Post Discussion/Debate Reflection: • Provide 2 discussion questions you can present to the group to stimulate debate and conversation. • What were the main points of discussion in your small group? Provide 3 highlights. • How has your perspective changed regarding the moral dilemma after having the discussion/debate with your group? Provide at least 2 pieces of insight.

  9. See Rubric for Further Success Criteria

  10. Timelines: • Preparation Work Due (in Rough): • ____________________________________________ • Group Discussions/Debates: • ____________________________________________ • Good Copy Due: • ____________________________________________

  11. Find your Article Online • Aversion Experiment (2 articles): • http://archive.samj.org.za/2001%20VOL%2091%20Jan-Dec/Articles/03%20March/1.5%20THE%20AVERSION%20PROJECT%20-%20PSYCHIATRIC%20ABUSES%20IN%20THE%20SOUTH%20AFRICAN%20DEFENCE%20FORCE%20DURING%20THE%20APART.pdf • http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC535952/

  12. Spitz - Hospitalism: • http://www.tigertouch.org/documents/beforeethics.pdf • MK Ultra: • http://mwcnews.net/focus/analysis/649-mk-ultra-the-cias-mind-control-program.html?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page • Harlow’s Monkey Experiments: • http://www.rw.ttu.edu/ethics/pdf's/O5%20.pdf

  13. Willowbrook School Hepatitis Study: • http://science.jburroughs.org/mbahe/BioEthics/Articles/WilliowbrookRobinson2008.pdf • Watson – Little Albert (2 Articles): • http://psychology.about.com/od/classicpsychologystudies/a/little-albert-experiment.htm • http://psychology.about.com/od/classicalconditioning/a/sad-tale-of-little-albert.htm

  14. Monster Study: • http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~bigopp/stutter2.html • Nazi Human Experiments: • http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/naziexp.html

More Related