1 / 7

Math Assessment Report

Math Assessment Report. Spring 2008 results For Math 25 SLO’s. Overview of Process. Common Final Exams Everyone turns in exams Volunteers assess using SLO’s Norm grading with rubrics and practice Multiple looks at randomly selected papers Collect data and analyze. Rubrics.

gay-keller
Download Presentation

Math Assessment Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Math Assessment Report Spring 2008 results For Math 25 SLO’s

  2. Overview of Process • Common Final Exams • Everyone turns in exams • Volunteers assess using SLO’s • Norm grading with rubrics and practice • Multiple looks at randomly selected papers • Collect data and analyze

  3. Rubrics

  4. Data Recording Example

  5. Data Analysis FA 03 FA 06 FA 07 SP 08 Sample size 23 26 33 30 Mean 2.8 2.8 2.92 2.58 St. Dev. 1.1 0.9 1.01 .84 Low 1.5 1.3 1 1.3 1st quartile 1.5 2.3 2.25 1.8 2nd quartile 3 2.5 3 2.5 3rd quartile 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.0 High 5 4.6 4.5 4.5 % proficient 57% 42% 61% 37% FA 03 FA 06 FA 07 SP 08 Sample size 23 28 33 30 Mean 2.9 2.5 2.55 2.59 St. Dev. 1.0 1.0 1.23 .91 Low 1 1.3 1 1 1st quartile 2 2.1 1.3 2 2nd quartile 3 2.5 2.5 2.5 3rd quartile 3.5 3.1 3.5 3.3 High 4.3 4.8 5 5 % proficient 61% 32% 48% 43% FA 03 FA 06 FA 07 SP 08 Sample size 23 28 33 30 Mean 2.5 2.7 3.05 3.08 St. Dev. 1.1 .9 1.75 .89 Low 1 1.3 1 1.3 1st quartile 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.5 2nd quartile 2.5 2.5 3 3.25 3rd quartile 3.5 3.4 4 3.8 High 5 4.5 5 4.5 % proficient 39% 39% 64% 60%

  6. Conclusions • All instructors participating • Communication a major drop • Easy to distinguish good vs. bad work • Definite achievement gap • This semester

More Related