1 / 39

Chapter five: Civil Rights

Chapter five: Civil Rights. AP Focus. History is only important to the point that it helps in understanding the political significance Frequent AP question is about forms of political participation other than voting

Download Presentation

Chapter five: Civil Rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter five: Civil Rights

  2. AP Focus • History is only important to the point that it helps in understanding the political significance • Frequent AP question is about forms of political participation other than voting • “If voting is the only effective method of political participation, then how did African Americans achieve relative parity without the vote?”

  3. AP Focus • Be able to list the barriers to minority political participation, and identify the specific policy change that removed the barrier • The struggle to achieve full political rights was not confined to African Americans. • Key factor in understanding the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is that much of its provisions are based on the commerce clause • Be able to summarize the major provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965

  4. AP Focus • Consider the negative and positive effects of affirmative action as well as the negative and positive effects of eliminating affirmative action.

  5. Conceptions of Equality • Fourteenth Amendment – forbids the states from denying any person “the equal protection of the laws” • Recognize the difference between the due process clause and equal protection • Due process = fair trials / legal fairness • Equal protection = treated equally / based on demographics

  6. Civil Rights and the SCOTUS • Government has the power to make reasonable classifications between person or groups • Denying vote to those under 18 • Higher excise tax on those who smoke • 14 year-olds can’t drive • Entitlement programs

  7. Civil Rights and SCOTUS • Minimum or Rationale Basis Scrutiny – government need only show that the challenged qualification is rationally related to serving a legitimate state interest • Children • Mentally challenged • Homosexuals

  8. Civil Rights and SCOTUS • Middle-tier scrutiny – government must show that the challenged classification serves an important state interest and the classification is at least substantially related to serving that interest

  9. Classification that receive middle-tier scrutiny • Gender

  10. Civil Rights and SCOTUS • Strict scrutiny = classification based on race and ethnic background is inherently suspect and must meet a strict scrutiny test • Government must show that the challenged classification shows a compelling state interest and is NECESSARY to serve that interest

  11. Classifications that need strict scrutiny • Race • National origin • Religion • Voting

  12. The Struggle for Racial Equality • The Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) • SCOTUS ruled that Black people were not citizens of the United States and therefore could not petition the court • National legislation could not limit the spread of slavery • Repealed the Northwest Ordinance and the Missouri Compromise

  13. The Struggle for Racial Equality • Reconstruction Amendments • 13th Amendment • 14th Amendment • 15th Amendment

  14. The Struggle for Racial Equality • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) • Dispute over Louisiana law requiring “equal but separate accommodations” on railroad coaches • SCOTUS upheld “separate but equal” • “Separate but equal” sanctioned segregation and strengthened the states at the expense of the federal govt.

  15. The Struggle for Racial Equality • Brown v. Board (1954) • (Earl) Warren Court • Court ruled that racially segregated schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment • Reversed “separate but equal” • Racially segregated schools are inherently unequal

  16. The Struggle for Racial Equality • Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Ended Jim Crow by making discrimination illegal in hotels, motels, restaurants, and other public accommodations • Prohibited discrimination in employment based on race, color, national origin, gender, religion • Created equal employment opportunity commission • Authorized DOJ to initiate lawsuits to desegregate public facilities including schools • Prohibited discrimination in employment

  17. The Struggle for Racial Equality • SCOTUS upheld the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawing segregation in places of public accommodation by ruling that such segregation involved interstate commerce

  18. AP TIP • Brown v. Board and the Civil Rights Act of 1954 are often on the test • Brown used the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to reverse Plessy v. Ferguson • Civil Rights Act 1964 used the commerce clause

  19. Struggle for African American Voting Rights • Poll taxes • Literacy tests • White primaries • 1960, only 29% of African Americans were registered compared to 61% of whites

  20. Struggle for African American Voting Rights • Eliminating the poll tax • 24th Amendment (1964) prohibited poll taxes in federal elections • 1966 incorporated and voided poll taxes for state elections

  21. Struggle for African American Voting Rights • Voting Rights Act of 1965 • Outlawed literacy tests and other discriminatory practices • Provided federal oversight of voter registration in area with a history of discriminatory voting practices • Improved the registration disparity • 1965 only 70 African American elected officials in the 11 southern states • By 2000 the number was over 5,000

  22. Struggle for African American Voting Rights • Racial Gerrymandering • Following the 1990 census, several state legislatures created oddly shaped districts designed to give minority group voters a numerical majority • Shaw v. Reno (1993) held that oddly shaped minority-majority districts would be held to a standard of Strict Scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause • Subsequent SCOTUS decisions have held that the use of race as a “predominant factor” in drawing districts is unconstitutional

  23. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Original status of women • Although women were considered citizens they had NO political rights • Women were subjected to male-dominated system of family law. For example, women could not divorce their husbands, sign contacts, or dispose of property • Women were denied educational and career opportunities • 1873 SCOTUS “The paramount destiny and mission of women are to fulfill the noble and benign offices of wife and mother"

  24. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Seneca Falls Convention 1848 • Led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott • Called for the abolition of legal, economic, and social discrimination against women

  25. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • The fight for suffrage • Women’s rights activists were bitterly disappointed when the 15th Amendment did not grant the right to vote to women • Had to wait until 1920 and the 19th Amendment

  26. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) • Passed by Congress in 1972 • “equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex” • ERA fell three states short of the ¾ needed for ratification

  27. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Milestones in the modern women’s rights movement • Equal pay act of 1963 – equal pay for equal work • However women still make $0.81 for every $1.00 men make • Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination in employment based on race and sex

  28. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Milestones (cont.) • 1966 Betty Freidan and other leading feminists created the National Organization of Women (NOW) to challenge discrimination • Reed v. Reed (1971) • Idaho law that automatically preferred a father over a mother as executor of a son’s estate violated Equal Protection • Reed decision: laws that classify on the basis on gender must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must serve a important government objective”

  29. Women’s Struggle for Civil Rights • Milestones (cont.) • Title IX of the Education Act of 1972 forbids education institutions receiving federal funds from discriminating against female students. • Pivotal in developing women’s athletic programs • Lilly Ledbetter Act 2010 allows more time and flexibility for lawsuits to filed against “discriminatory” hiring practices

  30. Affirmative Action • Background • 1965 LBJ executive order requiring all contractors and unions doing business with the federal govt. to take affirmative action in hiring minorities. • 2 years later was expanded to include women • Requires federal agencies, universities, and most employers to take positive steps to remedy the effects of past discrimination

  31. Affirmative Action • Debate • Supporters believe affirmative actions is needed to make up for past injustices. • “Freedom is not enough. You do not take a person who for years has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race and then say, ‘ you are free to compete with all the others’ and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.” ~ LBJ • Supporters also argue that diversity is an important social goal

  32. Affirmative Action • Debate • Critics believe affirmative action programs create reverse discrimination that unfairly penalize members of the majority group • Critics also contend that laws and policies should promote equal opportunity, not equal results

  33. Affirmative Action • Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) • Prior to 1971 had NO minority students • In 1971 increased students to 100 and created plan where 16 students would be for “minority” or “disadvantaged” students • The 16 special slots did not have to meet the same standards as other applicants

  34. Affirmative Action • Bakke (cont.) • Allan Bakke, a 37 year-old white NASA engineer, was not accepted • Quota system is unconstitutional, violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment • Court also ruled that race COULD be used as ONE factor among others

  35. Recent Affirmative Action Cases • Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) • Upheld the University of Michigan policy using race as a factor in admissions • Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) • Struck down U of M undergrad policy that automatically awarded minorities the 20 points required for admissions • Violated the equal protection clause of the 14th, was tantamount to creating a quota system

More Related