michigan school improvement framework n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Michigan School Improvement Framework PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Michigan School Improvement Framework

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Michigan School Improvement Framework - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 132 Views
  • Uploaded on

Michigan School Improvement Framework. In Support of the State Board of Education’s Vision Statement. State Board of Education’s Vision Statement

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Michigan School Improvement Framework' - ethan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
in support of the state board of education s vision statement
In Support of the State Board of Education’s Vision Statement

State Board of Education’s Vision Statement

The State Board of Education and Department of Education, with their partners, are the driving forces to create learning environments that prepare all students to be successful in the 21st Century knowledge economy.

Our challenge - to co-create systemic processes that engender and promote continuous school improvement.

the challenge
The Challenge…
  • Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement.
the challenge1
The Challenge…
  • Develop a framework that is based on research yet can be individualized to support the unique needs of each school.
the challenge2
The Challenge…
  • Provide the educational community with a common school improvement dialogue and vocabulary.
the challenge3
The Challenge…
  • Serve as a conceptual foundation to guide our thinking and action regarding school improvement.
the challenge4
The Challenge…
  • Develop a set of standards through which our work is filtered and/or designed
    • Professional Development
    • Technical Support and Program Development
    • Grant Criteria
    • Accreditation – Performance Indicators
criteria for si framework
Criteria for SI Framework
  • Build on current Indicators
  • Easy to Understand & User Friendly
  • Focused on Student Achievement
  • Measurable and Organic
  • Self-sufficient/Stand Alone
criteria continued
Criteria continued…
  • Aligned - NCLB, Research, State/Federal Programs, PA 25, existing Performance Indicators
  • Address triple purpose:
    • feedback and guidance,
    • guideposts for our work, and
    • internal accountability
overview of workgroup process
Overview of Workgroup Process
  • Convened 60 educators (July ‘04)
  • Reviewed “Kent Report” for recommendations
  • Reviewed current EdYES! Performance

Indicators

  • Reviewed the literature on school improvement
  • Cross-referenced research – search for common elements
overview of workgroup process1
Overview of Workgroup Process
  • Developed a “School Improvement Framework” as a curriculum – strands, standards, benchmarks, criteria, rubrics
  • OSI develops framework; OEAA develops measurements
  • Cross reference Framework w/ Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS)
  • State Board Final Approval (Dec ’05)
the si framework

Prioritize

The SI Framework

5 Strands

12 Standards

Prioritize

26 Benchmarks

Key Characteristics

slide14

The 5 Strands

Strand I - TEACHING for LEARNING

Strand II – LEADERSHIP

Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Strand IV – SCHOOL & COMMUNITY RELATIONS

slide15

The 12 Standards

Strand I – TEACHING

for LEARNING

Strand II - LEADERSHIP

CURRICULUM

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

INSTRUCTION

SHARED LEADERSHIP

ASSESSMENT

OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.

Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROF. LEARNING

Strand IV - SCHOOL/ COMMUNITY RELATIONS

Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PARENT/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT

DATA MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

the si framework1
The SI Framework

5 Strands

12 Standards

26 Benchmarks

Key Characteristics

slide18
Strand I: Teaching for Learning

The school holds high expectations for all students, identifies essential curricular content, makes certain it is sequenced appropriately and is taught effectively in the available instructional times. Assessments used are aligned to curricular content and are used to guide instructional decisions and monitor student learning.

Standard 1: Curriculum

Schools/districts have a cohesive plan for instruction and learning that serves as the basis for teachers’ and students’ active involvement in the construction and application of knowledge.

Benchmark B: Communicated

School/district curriculum is provided to staff, students, and parents in a manner that they can understand.

rubric intent
Rubric Intent
  • Further defines and gives meaning to the School Improvement Framework.
  • Helps to visualize a “continuum of practice.”
  • Facilitates a conversation based upon a common language.
  • Promotes self-assessment of current level of implementation.
rubric intent cont
Rubric Intent Cont.
  • Provides a description of the next level of success.
  • Describes exemplary practice.
  • Suggests sources of documentation to validate level of implementation.
the si framework2

Prioritize

The SI Framework

5 Strands

12 Standards

Prioritize

26 Benchmarks

Key Characteristics

school improvement cycle

GatherData

Study

Student

Achievement

Do

Plan

School Improvement Cycle
documents available online
Documents Available Online
  • The School Improvement Framework, Rubrics, this PowerPoint, and other resources are available online at:

www.mi.gov/osi

or at

www.mi.gov/schoolimprovement

slide33

Contact Information

  • Dr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, Director

Office of School Improvement

Canuly@michigan.gov

  • Linda Forward, Supervisor

Office of School Improvement

ForwardL@michigan.gov

  • Linda Kent, Project Coordinator

Office of School Improvement

KentL2@michigan.gov