1 / 35

Why do we need a VLST for studying QSO absorption lines?

Why do we need a VLST for studying QSO absorption lines?. So that we can go deeper…. Brilliant!. A Genius!!. sublime…. The Critics agree…. QSO absorption lines and a VLST. My top-three topics for QAL studies in the UV: {detailed probing of the `cosmic web’ (Ly a , weak metal lines)} 

elu
Download Presentation

Why do we need a VLST for studying QSO absorption lines?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why do we need a VLST for studying QSO absorption lines? So that we can go deeper…

  2. Brilliant! A Genius!! sublime…. The Critics agree….

  3. QSO absorption lines and a VLST My top-three topics for QAL studies in the UV: {detailed probing of the `cosmic web’ (Lya, weak metal lines)}  metallicity of nearby galaxies QSO absorption lines from QSOs (briefly)

  4. What about metallicity? • Measurements from QSO absorption lines show little evolution from z=4 to ~1 • The lack of evolution appears to be largely independent of column density • from Lya-forest clouds to Damped Lya systems (DLAs)

  5. 13.5-5.8 Gyr 5.8 – 1.2 Gyr Pettini (2003) What about metallicity? Kinda surprising…. expect `gas’ in the universe to be getting more enriched with time as galaxies evolve and pollute • DLAs in particular don’t approach solar at z=0

  6. Let’s measure metallicities from nearby galaxies… • Advantages of looking at nearby galaxies: • determine wide range of galaxy properties (21cm, X-ray, etc.) • select low luminosity galaxies that are hard to see at higher-z • check for fainter interlopers close to any selected galaxy • easier to examine the galaxy’s environment (isolated, group, cluster)

  7. NGC 4319, v=1405 km s-1 QSO absorption lines from nearby galaxies Mrk 205, z=0.071

  8. Time for one example…… to show what can be done and how far we’ve got Used HST + STIS to measure abundances towards HS1543+5921 / SBS1543+593 With: Ed Jenkins, Todd Tripp, Max Pettini

  9. 10’ DSS image SBS1543+593 HS 1543+5921 z=0.807

  10. QSO star HII region, z=0.009 (2700 km s-1) APO 3.5m, R, 15 min Reimers & Hagen 98

  11. QSO star HST STIS (clear), 800s

  12. Spectroscopy F(1200) = 2.6x10-15 pretty hard even with first-order gratings; fortunately CVZ object (15 orbits) [S/H] = -0.4 Higher than expected?

  13. HS1543+5921 PG1543+489 Pettini (2003) Compare Zs with DLA samples

  14. List of other suitable pairs which can be observed at high spectral resolution with HST:

  15. What could we do with a VLST? • There are plenty of QSO-galaxy pairs in the sky! Just too faint! • Go deeper, the number of interesting pairs becomes substantial

  16. STIS echelle

  17. What could we do with a VLST? • There are plenty of QSO-galaxy pairs in the sky! Just too faint! • Go deeper, the number of interesting pairs becomes substantial • Already know some QSO intercept large N(H I) from 21cm maps [knowing HI a priori helps choose a target to measure Z] • Four examples, just to show what we’re missing out on…. • VLA maps from Womble (1993) • optical images from DSS

  18. Gal: IC1746 cz = 5201 km/s QSO: 0151+045 sep = 10 kpc V=14.8? F(1220)=3e-15 ==30 STIS orbits Nice edge-on galaxy probe outer disk

  19. N(H I) ~ 7-13 e19 cm/2 CaII: 

  20. Gal: NGC3184 cz = 592 km/s QSO: 1015+416 sep = 11 kpc V=17.7 – 19.1? F(1220)=? chance to probe edge of huge HI envelope… …compare to metallicties from HII regions…

  21. N(H I) ~ 4e19 cm/2 CaII: 

  22. Gal: NGC470 cz = 2374 km/s QSO: Q0117+031 sep = 10 kpc V=18.2 F(1220)=? NGC 474 19.9

  23. N(H I) ~ 6-10 e20 cm/2 CaII: 

  24. Gal: NGC3079 cz = 1125 km/s QSO: Q0957+558 sep = 8 kpc V=17.4 F(1220)=1e-15

  25. 2.5 hrs, F658N, WFPC2 Great way to study outflows!

  26. N(H I) ~ 3 e20 cm/2 CaII: 

  27. …or multiple QSOs! NGC 3628 (cz=843 km/s) QSOs have ‘O’ mags between 18.7 and 20.7 4 X-ray sources near M65 Arp et al 2002

  28. …or multiple multiple QSOs! (narrow metal lines instead of DLAs)

  29. Summary • There are plenty of QSO-galaxy pairs known: • though number with 21cm maps and/or CaII/NaI observations is smaller • more behind galaxy disks to appear with GALEX presumably • … and using SDSS photo-z techniques • Need UV telescope that can: • reach 10 km/s resolution down to 20 mag • factor of 250 in flux over STIS G140M echelle • large wavelength range to cover many lines • important for ionization corrections • …. and for studying relative abundunace patterns which can be used to infer history of metal production • how about…. a LiF coated mirror and do < 1100A as well? i.e. HST+FUSE • Payoff: • detailed inventory of galaxy metallicities in the local universe • for individual galaxies: • ability to compare ISM abundances with values from HII regions • variations of metallicities as a function of radius if multiple sightlines available • kinematics and ionization structure of gas in the outer regions of galaxies • probes of the interface between a galaxy and the IGM

  30. QSO absorption lines from QSOs Suppose instead of probing galaxies, could probe QSOs instead. • QSOs are ejecting large amounts of metal-enriched gas into the IGM  might expect: • metallicity of the gas around a QSO to be high • ionization of the gas to be high • absorption to be complex from outflows mixing with the IGM • By observing many QSO-QSO pairs, should be able to track the enrichment of the IGM with radius • Compare absorption from a f/g QSO with associated absorption (zabs ~ zem) in the QSO’s spectrum • learn more about associated systems, compare structure, ionization, and metallicity variations over small scales.

  31. Available QSO-QSO pairs • SDSS provides a large # of QSO pair candidates with the b/g QSO < 20th • Often require follow-up spectra of one of the pairs from the ground • both from collaborators: Joe Hannawi, Gordon Richards and Michael Strauss

  32. 4.1”, 19 h-1 kpc J0836+4841 z=0.66 z=1.71

  33. J0836+4841 • zabs = zQSO = 0.66 in SDSS spec • Likely to be a DLA! • Probably host galaxy • Perhaps high metallicity?

  34. 3e-16 J2313+1445 zbg = 1.52 zfg = 0.79 sep = 6.4” or 32 h-1 kpc • - outflowing gas from jet • companion fuelling QSO • unrelated galaxy in • QSO cluster

  35. A future project • QSOs appear to cause the same kinds of MgII systems that field galaxies cause • Will need a VLST to do the kinds of spectroscopy of interest….

More Related