30 likes | 149 Views
The ForCES Working Group convened during IETF 58 on November 10, 2003, addressing various topics crucial to the ForCES framework. The session included discussions on proposed metadata vocabularies, model updates, and router management protocols. Notable presentations covered GRMP Version 1, topology representation for the ForCES Framework Element model, and updates on the FACT protocol. The meeting also focused on the status of drafts and requirements in the AD/IESG review process, emphasizing the collaborative efforts to refine the ForCES architecture and protocols.
E N D
ForCES: Forwarding and Control Element Separation Working Group IETF 58 1300-1500 November 10, 2003
ForCES Agenda, IETF 58 1300-1305 WG Status & Agenda Bash – Chairs 1305-1315 A proposed vocabulary and conceptual model for discussing metadata within ForCES - Alan DeKokhttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dekok-forces-metadata-00.txt 1315-1340 ForCES Model Update - Steven Blakehttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-01.txtW 1340-1400 General Router Management Protocol (GRMP) Version 1 - Weiming Wanghttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-grmp-00.txt 1400-1405 Topology representation for ForCES FE model - Weiming Wanghttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-model-topology-00.txt 1405-1425 Netlink2 protocol - Steven Blakehttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jhsrha-forces-netlink2-02.txt 1425-1445 Status update for FACT protocol - Ram Gopal http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gopal-forces-fact-05.txt 1445-1500 15 min - Linux traffic control extensions & the forces model - Jamal Hadi Salim(no draft available)
ForCES WG Status Requirements: In AD/IESG review state In IESG Editor’s queue • Some text changes discussed on list that will be made during authors’ 48 hours period. See website for details. Framework: In AD/IESG review state Feedback received from IESG • Authorization needs to be explicitly called out post-authentication • Security architecture when FE proxy used needs to be elaborated • See mailing list for details. Model: Individual drafts submitted Accepted as WG draft • Model draft revised to version -01 • Still more work to be done Protocol: Two candidates Three candidates, protocol evaluation starting • FACT, Netlink2, GRMP • Protocol evaluation draft started and accepted as WG draft • November 21 deadline for authors to contribute to evaluation draft Applicability Statement: On hold On hold • Played key role as “anti-requirements” at start of WG. • Next step is to explain how/where protocols are used, will be done once protocol selection progresses further. • In between those two points so staying on hold.