150 likes | 200 Views
Explore the evolution of drug regulation from fringe to mainstream debate. Understand nuances between decriminalization, depenalization, and legalization. Learn about practical applications in various jurisdictions and messaging strategies for informed discourse.
E N D
www.tdpf.org.uk Steve Rolles Steve@tdpf.org.uk
Context • Debate on regulation of drugs has moved decisively from margins to mainstream • No longer just a theoretical debate – or limited just to decriminalisation; reform being debated, developed and implemented in multiple jurisdictions • Regulation now a core part of discourse – vital that we are able to support and inform debate in a coherent and positive way • But....regulation only one part of the jigsaw
Key recent moments • 2011 Global Commission encourages ‘experimentation by governments with legal regulation of drugs’ • 2012 – Latin heads of state back debate on regulation • 2012 – Washington/Colorado vote to legalise cannabis • 2013 – New Zealand passes NPS regulation Bill • 2013 – Uruguay Govt legalise and regulate cannabis • 2013 – US majority support for cannabis regulation • 2014 – Oregon and Alaska vote to legalise cannabis • 2014 – US floats treaty flexibility argument • 2015 – Canada announces cannabis legalisation • 2015 – Mexico supreme court case
Decriminalisation • Often confused with legalisation • No formal legal definition • Generally understood as the removal of criminal sanctions for use or possession for personal use • Focus is on decriminalising the person – not the drug • Still and offense, and non-criminal sanctions remain (such as fines or treatment assessments) – as does confiscation • Wide variety of policy & practice – difficult to generalise • Distinction between de facto and de jure decriminalisation
Depenalisation • Generally refers to reducing or eliminating penalties for possession or other minor offenses • Mostly best avoided – confusing and unhelpful • Translation issues in international discourse.
Legalisation / regulation • ‘Legalisation’ is a misunderstood and maligned term – best avoided • ‘Legalisation’ is a process – not a policy position • Legally regulated markets (production and supply/availability) – are the policy being advocated • So more useful to talk about ‘legalisation and regulation’ or ‘moving towards legally regulated markets’
What is regulation? • Regulation of risky products and behaviours is a primary function of government. Motive is public good. • Distinction from ‘free markets’, or illegal markets regulated by entrepreneurs for whom motive is profit • Regulation is the norm (Prohibition is the radical experiment) • Regulation model shaped by risk and environment – no one size fits all model • Activities outside of regulatory framework remain prohibited
What can we regulate? • Production and transit • Products: dosage, preparation, price and packaging • Vendors: licensing, training requirements • Outlets: location, appearance, hours of opening • Marketing: advertising, branding, promotions • Buyers/Users: Who has access? - age controls • A flexible menu of options – applied to different products in different environments (see Blueprint)
5 models of regulation • Medical prescription and supervised venues e.g. OST • A specialist pharmacist sales model e.g. OTC Rx • Various forms of licensed retail e.g. off-licenses • Licensed premises for sale and consumption e.g. bars, coffee-shops • Unlicensed sales e.g. coffee, coca tea
Regulation in practice: Cannabis • Netherlands – long standing but problematic • US state models – more commercialised • Uruguay – stricter Govt controlled model • Spain – non-profit cannabis social clubs
Regulation in practice: Other • Heroin prescribing – and other drug of choice prescribing • New Zealand – NPS Regulation Bill • Tobacco and Alcohol – WHO best practice • Regulation of other forms of vice (inc. gambling and sex work) • Regulation of medicines/pharmaceuticals
Key messaging • Emphasize the idea of ‘retaking control’ • Regulate drugs because they are risky – not because they are safe • Regulation is not a pancea / silver bullet • Change will be phased / incremental