emac 2003 doctoral colloquium summary information n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
EMAC 2003 DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM SUMMARY INFORMATION Veronica Wong PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
EMAC 2003 DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM SUMMARY INFORMATION Veronica Wong

Loading in 2 Seconds...

  share
play fullscreen
1 / 7
eddiea

EMAC 2003 DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM SUMMARY INFORMATION Veronica Wong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

0 Views
Download Presentation
EMAC 2003 DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM SUMMARY INFORMATION Veronica Wong
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. EMAC 2003 DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM SUMMARY INFORMATION Veronica Wong

  2. Summary Statistics • 62 Proposals from • 18 countries • 30 female, and • 32 male candidates • 35 Reviewers from 14 Countries • 44 Accepted Proposals • Four tracks: Consumer Behaviour; Marketing Interfaces; Marketing Mix/Management and E-Marketing

  3. Subject Heterogeneity

  4. Student Feedback

  5. Positive Intensity of the interactions Multi-cultural/national audience Excellent feedback Quality Plenaries Friendly faculty Excellent faculty Supportive atmosphere Certificates for attendance Negative Heterogeneity of topics Intensity of program Venue organisation (small room, no water, no photocopying facility) No website access More time between paper acceptance and second submission date Student Comments

  6. Doctoral Colloquium ReviewersCountry level Average/country: 8.4 papers Average/reviewer: 2.6 papers

  7. Doctoral Colloquium ReviewersIndividual level • Average number of papers / reviewer: • 3.4 in total • 2.2 as Reviewer 1 and 2