1 / 16

Constructing the Reality of Politics: The Campaign

Constructing the Reality of Politics: The Campaign. Politics in Film Joe Braunwarth. Bob Roberts. Intended to be a Satire Pre-Movie bullets: Why the documentary format/reporter? How prescient is this movie? Have events overtaken the movie? Note how the news media cover the campaign.

dallon
Download Presentation

Constructing the Reality of Politics: The Campaign

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Constructing the Reality of Politics: The Campaign Politics in Film Joe Braunwarth

  2. Bob Roberts • Intended to be a Satire • Pre-Movie bullets: • Why the documentary format/reporter? • How prescient is this movie? Have events overtaken the movie? • Note how the news media cover the campaign. • Note how the campaign is presented through other media • Note background and image of Roberts • Why the construction of an image around family values and national pride? • Why does the “take, make, and win” theme resonate with those who can’t?

  3. Mediated Campaigns • Campaigns are dominated by media events • Ads • News (featuring staged Photo-Ops) • Talk Shows • Debates • Think about how are these depicted in the films we see here?

  4. Roberts and the News Media • How does the media cover the Roberts’ campaign? • Present material from official sources without question or commentary (Wag the Dog) • Why don’t they pick up on the misleading aspects of the Roberts’ campaign? • Norm of objectivity • Emphasis on what people want to see rather than what they need to know (Network) • Emphasis on scandal even when proven to be false • Emphasis on the Horse Race of the campaign • Think about these topics in the context of Postman and Network

  5. Roberts and the Media • Through what other media does Roberts present his campaign? • Ads, songs, videos, debates guest appearances • How would you describe Roberts’ campaign ads? • Misleading and lacking specificity • What is the significance of Roberts’ folk songs and music videos? • Songs are all old liberal folk songs with the words changed • Rather than attacking racial injustice or fight poverty and war, is a full frontal attack on 1960s idealism: attacks the poor and homeless, anti-war activists, hippies, drugs • Note the opposing view presented on “Cutting Edge” and by Buzz the Reporter

  6. Roberts and the Media • Note the different rhetorical style of the debates, which one plays better? • Why is it important for Roberts to appear on the comedy show? (this was originally written as a short subject for SNL) • Increasingly important to appear on these types of shows

  7. Campaign Necessities • Must have the “fire in the belly” to put up with the long duration and intense scrutiny of the campaign • This deters otherwise qualified candidates • Money is a necessary but not sufficient ingredient for electoral success; Must either have it or be able to raise it • Whom does this exclude? • Third Parties, Working Class advocates, etc. • How is this reflected in the films we are going to see?

  8. Image • What is Roberts’ background? • Wealthy and Well-Connected (Almost universally necessary for major political office) • What kind of image does Roberts construct? • Sincere believer in restoring intangibles like national pride, family values, etc. • Consider why these things are stressed over more substantive policy positions • Are widely valued but unspecific • Reflects the emphasis on image>substance in contemporary campaigns and politics in general

  9. Saffell Article • What are the three primary factors that determine for whom people will vote? • party identification, issues, and personal characteristics of the candidates • How is this reflected in the movie?

  10. Prescience? • How was this movie prescient? • Prescient satire of how a relatively small portion of the voting public makes a Roberts’ phenomena possible • Predicts the appeal of an ultra-conservative political and economic policy even to those who have nothing • Note the parallels between the first Gulf War and the recent one as a source of generating fear, etc.

  11. The Message • One review calls this film “a scathing critique of the views, motives, and effects of conservative, populist politics in America” • How so? • Audiences negotiate the media • Can you see other interpretations of this film? • Does this seem so “scathing” today? • Or has political debate moved to the right?

  12. Mockumentary • Why the documentary film (Note the use of hand-held cameras, etc.)? • Interesting narrative device, vehicle by which to see the reality behind the image of the candidate • Somewhat falls apart under the weight of the melodrama toward the end • What is discovered about Roberts’ character by the documentary film maker? • Somewhat cynical and vengeful • Why use a reporter? • Common tool to present political information, we’ll see this used in other films • Also emphasizes the potential for a watchdog rather than a lapdog press • Why is Buzz not taken seriously? • Again image, etc.

  13. The Candidate • Story of a brash, young, idealist who gets involved in politics in order to get his liberal message out • Can say what he wants because he can’t win • What happens when winning becomes a possibility? • Why does this happen? • Does it necessarily have to happen; “Maybe there are questions that can’t be raised in a political campaign?” • Why the emphasis on image>substance?

  14. Politics is Bull***t • Why does the race becomes more about politics than the message? • When he has a chance of winning, he gets swallowed by the political machine • How is this demonstrated in the movie? • The laughing fits, the skewing of the stump speech • In the final scene, when his father says, “you’re a politician now,” what does he mean? • That politics is not noble civic virtue but about manipulation • Is it necessary that politics be manipulative? • Would this manipulation be necessary if the media provided more substantive information and the voters were better informed?

  15. Politics is Bull***t • What would happen to a candidate who ran a substantive campaign on specific issue proposals? • How does this film relate to the Braunwarth media reading (reader) • Emphasis is on packaging the campaign; spin>substance • Would this campaign be possible in a typographic age?

  16. What do we do now? • What is the answer to the “what do we do now?” question? • Emphasizes the disconnect between the campaign and the need to govern and the concern that success in the former doesn’t necessarily mean qualifications in the latter • Is this message accurate in your experience? • Is voter cynicism justified? • What role does the wife play? • She figures out the game early on • Does your opinion of the candidate change when he and the woman leave the hotel room?

More Related