1 / 24

Island Biogeography Theory

Habitat Fragmentation and Breeding Birds at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland Dr. Lowell Adams Natural Resources Management Program University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742.

cara-thomas
Download Presentation

Island Biogeography Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Habitat Fragmentation and Breeding Birds at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MarylandDr. Lowell Adams Natural Resources Management Program University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742

  2. Urban development fragments wildlife habitat into smaller, more isolated units.So what?Habitat fragmentation results in fewer numbers of species.(Loss of biodiversity)Why?

  3. Island Biogeography Theory

  4. A local exampleNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt, Maryland

  5. Procedures Birds • Point counts and transect counts for breeding birds (Ralph et al. 1995, Bibby et al. 2000)

  6. Procedures Birds • 5-min point counts conducted in large woodlots within a 50-m radius of each point • Transect counts conducted through center of small woodlots (5 min/100-m transect) • 7-10 surveys conducted at each site during June 2002 • Counts conducted from sunrise to 9 am during fair weather conditions • All species seen or heard and number of individuals/species recorded • Individual birds recorded only once/survey

  7. Number of species of breeding birds in forest fragments __________________________________________________ Forest fragment size ______________________________________ Large Medium Small (x = 15.82 ha) (x = 2.83 ha) (x = 0.36 ha) ___________________________________________________________________ Median number of species 19 20.5 11 Range 14-25 14-24 7-14 n 19 10 11 H’ = 23.04, df = 2, P < 0.001 _____________________________________________________________________

  8. Area-sensitive Forest Birds(Darr et al. 1998)Forest fragment size Large Medium SmallRed-shouldered hawk xYellow-billed cuckoo x xRed-bellied woodpecker x x xHairy woodpecker x x xPileated woodpecker xEastern wood-pewee x x xAcadian flycatcher x xWhite-breasted nuthatch x x xBlue-gray gnatcatcher x x xWood thrush x xYellow-throated vireo x x Red-eyed vireo x x Northern parula x xBlack-and-white warbler xWorm-eating warbler xOvenbird x xLouisiana waterthrush Not recordedKentucky warbler Not recordedHooded warbler Not recordedSummer tanager xScarlet tanager x x

  9. Area-sensitive Forest Birds (Species recorded only in large fragments) Red-shouldered hawk (5 recorded) Pileated woodpecker (2 recorded) Black-and-white warbler (1 recorded) Worm-eating warbler (5 recorded) Summer tanager (1 recorded)

  10. Area-sensitive Forest Birds29 wood thrushes recorded in large fragments (1 in medium fragments)55 ovenbirds recorded in large fragments (3 in medium fragments)31 scarlet tanagers recorded in large fragments (3 in medium fragments)

  11. Distribution of “suburban residential” birds at NASAGoddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, summer 2002.________________________________________________ Forest fragment size Suburban residential birds ____________________ (Aldrich and Coffin 1980) Large Medium Small________________________________________________Blue jay x x x American robin x x xGray catbird x x xNorthern mockingbird x x xEuropean starling x xNorthern cardinal x x xSong sparrow x xHouse sparrow x x x________________________________________________

  12. Suburban Residential BirdsMost Abundant in Small FragmentsGray catbird (6 of 36 in large fragments)House sparrow (1 of 23 in large fragments)

  13. Suburban Residential BirdsMost Abundant in Medium FragmentsNorthern mockingbird (4 of 39 in large fragments)All European starlings (40) in medium and small fragments on more developed west campus.

  14. Most Abundant and Widespread SpeciesTufted titmouseCarolina ChickadeeCarolina wrenCombined, made up 28.5%, 37.0%, and 33.7% of the bird community in large, medium, and small fragments.

  15. Procedures Owls • Tape playback recordings for screech, barred, and great-horned owls

  16. Great horned owl (0.14) Barred owl (0.29)

  17. Eastern screech-owl (0.14) Barred owl (0.71)

  18. Summary1. Seventy species recorded in breeding bird survey.2. Small forest fragments contained about half the number of species in large and medium- sized fragments.3. Small fragments do not provide habitat for “area sensitive” species in need of conservation.

  19. Summary4. Any additional fragmentation of forests at Goddard will further impact forest bird species most in need of conservation.5. Species most likely to be lost with further fragmentation are summer tanager, black- and-white warbler, and worm-eating warbler.

  20. Summary6. Three owl species were recorded (eastern screech-owl, barred owl, and great horned owl). All were located in large forest tracts. Loss or modification of the large forested fragments would be detrimental to these species.

More Related