1 / 12

Numerial Simulations of Convective Events – The Effect of Propagating Gust Fronts

Numerial Simulations of Convective Events – The Effect of Propagating Gust Fronts. Kaspar and Müller (kaspar@ufa.cas.cz) Institute of Atmospheric Physics ASCR, Prague, CR. H – head height. Simpson (1972). H. gust front. Motivation.

swann
Download Presentation

Numerial Simulations of Convective Events – The Effect of Propagating Gust Fronts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Numerial Simulations of Convective Events– The Effect ofPropagating Gust Fronts Kaspar and Müller (kaspar@ufa.cas.cz) Institute of Atmospheric Physics ASCR, Prague, CR

  2. H – head height Simpson (1972) H gust front Motivation Nowcasting, numerical and analytical studies.(Droegemeier and Wilhelmson, 1987; Liu and Moncrieff, 1996b) Interaction with environmental air – convection initiation - interaction with ambient vertical shear(Thorpe et al., 1980;Rotunno, 1988; Moncrieff and Liu, 1999) - collision with other gust fronts and convergence lines (Wilson and Schreiber, 1986) - interaction with mesoscale oscillations (Crook et al., 1990) Gust front = an advancing surface boundary of the outflow of thunderstorm downdrafts cooled by evaporation.

  3. potential instability, LCL STABILITY LOCATION 3-dim. position (thermal def.) MORPHOLOGY head height regime of propagation (Liu and Moncrieff, 1996a) VERTICAL SHEAR Methodology (Kaspar, 2003) • Model for the Objective Analysis of Gust Fronts (OAGF) LMCOSMO thermodynamic data, 2.8km (Doms and Schättler, 1999) MOVEMENT speed vector

  4. Convection initiation(a) PI and a low LCL all regimes (b) PS and / or a high LCL the steering-level anddownshear prop. regime Vertical shear conditions • Propagating regime • Upshear movement • Downshear movement • Steering-level (hs) regime Downshear movement with an overturning updraft 1 Relative flow 1 2 2 3 3

  5. Radar SkalkyZmax 13UTC 14UTC 15UTC OA gust fronts + surface precipitation rates [mm/h] OA gust fronts + vertical velocities [m/s] OA gust fronts + potential temperature [K] Case study 2.7.2000- validation tests

  6. c0=7.1m/sH =1180m Downshear propagating regime PI + decreasing LCL Case study 2.7.2000 Height of OA gust heads + RSM [dBZ] (Haase and Crewell, 2000)

  7. SkalkyZmax 01UTC 02UTC 03UTC Case study 22/23.7.1998- squall line(Salek, 2000) OA gust fronts + surface precipitation rates [mm/h]

  8. c0=5.1m/sH=1343m Steering-level regime Potential stability + increasing LCL Case study 22/23.7.1998 OA gust heads + RSM [dBZ]

  9. Conclusions • The validation tests confirmed the applicability of the LM COSMO-OAGF chain in the case of both isolated and multicellular convection. • The propagatinggust fronts had the potential for convection initiation in both presented case studies. • - 2 July 2000: favourable vertical shear, humidity and stability conditions • - 22 / 23 July 1998: favourable vertical shear conditions • - the both case studies are included in a paper accepted for Atmospheric Research (2006)

  10. Outlooks • The tuning and verification of the OAGF will continue. • - radar data assimilation- locating procedures based on the analysis of wind field … • The products of the OAGF are assumed to be used informulating decision criteria. • - total index quantifying the potential of a gust front to trigger new convection Acknowledgement: GA ASCR B3042404, GACR 205/04/0114 DWD (LM and RSM codes), CHMI (radar pictures)

  11. thank you for your attention

  12. References: Crook, N.A., Carbone, R.E., Moncrieff, M.W., Conway, J.W., 1990. The generation and propagation of a nocturnal squall line. Part II: Numerical simulations. Mon. Weather Rev. 118, 50-65. Doms, G., Schättler, U., 1999. The Nonhydrostatic Limited-Area Model LM of DWD. Part I: Scientific Documentation, DWD, Offenbach, Germany, 172 pp., available at http://www.cosmo-model.org. Droegemeier, K.K., Wilhelmson, R.B., 1987. Numerical simulation of thunderstorm outflow dynamics. Part I: Outflow sensitivity experiments and turbulence dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1180-1210. Haase, G., Crewell, S., 2000. Simulation of radar reflectivities using a mesoscale weather forecast model. Water Resources Research 36, 2221-2231. Hewson T.D., 1998. Objective fronts.Meteorol. Appl. 5, 37-65. Kaspar, M., 2003. Analyses of gust fronts by means of limited area NWP model outputs. Atmos. Res.67-68, 333-351. Liu, C., Moncrieff, M.W., 1996a. A numerical study of effects of ambient flow and shear on density currents. Mon. Weather Rev. 124, 2282-2303. Liu C., Moncrieff, M.W., 1996b. An analytical study of density currents in sheared, stratified fluids including the effects of latent heating. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 3303-3312. Moncrieff, M.W., Liu, C., 1999. Convection initiation by density currents: role of convergence, shear, and dynamical organization. Mon. Weather Rev. 127, 2455-2464. Rotunno, R., Klemp, J.B., Weisman, M.L., 1988. A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 463-485. Salek, M., 2000. Torrential rainfalls in the foothills of the Orlicke hory Mts. on the 22 and 23 July 1998 from the viewpoint of remote sensing and numerical model results (in Czech with English summary). Meteor. Bul. 53, 4-15. Simpson, J.E., 1972. Effects of the lower boundary on the head of a gravity current. J. Fluid Mechs. 53, 759-768. Thorpe, A. J., Miller, M.J., Moncrieff, M.W., 1980. Dynamical models of two-dimensional downdraughts. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 463-484. Wilson, J. W., Schreiber, W.E., 1986. Initiation of convective storms at radar-observed boundary-layer convergence lines. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 2516-2536.

More Related