1 / 19

Background

Promoting General Awareness of HPV, its Link to Cancer & Genital Warts: A Social Marketing Approach Allison Friedman, MS Eileen Dunne, MD Hilda Shepeard, MBA The findings & conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC/ATSDR.

boaz
Download Presentation

Background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Promoting General Awareness of HPV, its Link to Cancer & Genital Warts: A Social Marketing ApproachAllison Friedman, MSEileen Dunne, MDHilda Shepeard, MBAThe findings & conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC/ATSDR

  2. Background • Most sexually active people acquiregenitalHPV at some time in their lives. • Yet there have been no national public health efforts to educate the public about HPV & its link to genital warts (GW) or cervical cancer (CC). • What little HPV information is available through the Internet & the popular/news media has been found to be unreliable, inaccurate, & incomplete.(1) • National surveys suggest that the public is largely unaware of HPV; most do not know about the HPV-CC link. (2) • Anhang et al., 2003; Brandt et al., 2005; Perrin et al., 2002; Stevens et al., 2004 • ARHP, 2005; Wirthlin Worldwide, 2005; Kaiser Family Foundation, 2000

  3. In 2001, Congress mandated CDC to “prepare and distribute educational materials for the public that include information on genital HPV,” addressing: • modes of transmission • consequences of infection, including the HPV-CC link • available scientific evidence on condom effectiveness for HPV prevention • importance of regular Pap tests & other diagnostics for CC prevention • To be effective, these materials should be audience-centered, appropriate for, and relevant to target audiences (i.e., sexually active men & women).

  4. Methods Between 2003-2005, CDC conducted formative research with men & women in the US. Participants were segmented by age, race/ethnicity (White, African American, Hispanic*), gender, and geographic location. • Exploratory Research: 35 focus groups explored the public’s (ages 25-45 yrs) awareness, perceptions & information needs regarding HPV (N=315). • Concept Testing: 14 focus groups** tested effectiveness of various communciation approaches in capturing attention & achieving intended results among audiences, ages 18-45yrs (N=117). • Message Testing: 15 focus groups** with adults (ages 18-29yrs) tested draft messages (Eng & Span) and designs for understandability, appropriateness & effectiveness (N=134). *Intention to expand/adapt materials in 5 languages (5 populations) **Also segmented by language (English/Spanish)

  5. Exploratory Research Assessed public awareness of HPV, reactions to HPV information, and reactions to a hypothetical vaccine. Findings: • High awareness of GW; low awareness of HPV across all groups • Audience shock, fear, & concern in response to: • Commonness & potential consequences of HPV • Apparent ‘secrecy’ of government/public health agencies (AA) • Needed more information to assess vaccine acceptability • STD-associated stigma possible barrier to further info seeking & acceptance of a hypothetical vaccine

  6. Exploratory Research: Implications Communication effort should: Raise public awareness about HPV transmission, prevention, treatment and prevalence. Be approached with caution in light of public fears/concerns, government distrust, and potential stigma (of HPV and CC) Further research is needed to: determine how to frame messages to minimize potential consequences assess audience reactions to messages

  7. Concept TestingGoal: Identify effective communciation approaches that capture audience attention & prompt further information-seeking, without instilling public fear or stigmatizing HPV or CC. - Assessed audience reactions to HPV fact sheet - Tested 3 approaches, 13 identify images, 28 headlines, 30 visuals/tones

  8. Concept Testing: Results Participants reacted to HPV fact sheet with fear, confusion & anxiety. Fear & shock: • Commonness & potential severity, asymptomatic nature, lack of practical prevention, lack of cure, & lack of detection (men) of HPV Confusion: • HPV natural history, transmission, prevention, detection, clearance • Is HPV the same as cancer? HIV? Is it related to hygiene? (Hispanics) Concerns & anxieties: • Desire/urgency to get tested for HPV • Doubts/distrust of partners & intentions to be more selective • Blame befalling women since only they can get diagnosed (women)

  9. Concept/Approach Preferences • STDapproach preferred by Latinas, younger women(<30yrs) & men for its personal & shared relevance. All groups wanted to know source of HPV acquisition. • Women >30yrs preferred a cervical cancer approach, but this approach was seen as irrelevant to men, and Latinas worried it would place the burden on women. • Identity images that stressed commonness & personal relevance preferred. • Headlines addressing the commonness & asymptomatic nature of HPV were viewed as most appealing. • Tones/images depicting men & women (real people), diversity, intimacy & couples were preferred.

  10. Recommendations for HPV Communication • STD approach may have broadest appeal • Need for two unique sets of materials: • General HPV info resources for both genders • Resources with more detailed HPV info for women • More research is needed to: • Assess possible unintended consequences of STDapproach • Assess headlines emphasizing HPV prevalence, asymptomatic nature, & consequences • Clarify most appropriate tones & images for HPV messaging

  11. Designs Designs Designs Individual Individual Individual Couple Couple Couple Group Group Group Message TestingTested:- 2 versions of brochure content - 3 designs/headlines- 4 identity images

  12. Results: Message Testing • Information useful, understandable, informative • Reactions to info reflected an appropriate level of concern, rather than a sense of alarm • Audience confusion about: • seriousness of HPV (no need to get tested for HPV?) • HPV-CC link: HPV types, notion of a “low-risk” virus • HPV vs. HIV vs. HSV • Pap test vs. HPV test • incurable yet transient nature of HPV • Audience anxiety about: • ease of HPV transmission • asymptomatic & incurable nature of HPV • lack of practical prevention options

  13. Message/Design Preferences • Audiences preferred serious, eye-catching messages/designs, emphasizing indiscriminant, asymptomatic nature of HPV • Preference for statistics (↑ credibility, relevance), plain language, Q&A format, and messages minimizing blame • While message of ‘no blame/shame’ was clear, some felt HPV diagnosis would still prompt suspicions of partner infidelity • Hispanics appreciated guidance on how to discuss HPV with partner • Women did not want HPV framed as a women’s-only issue • Men wanted to know personal relevance & importance of HPV • All wanted clear guidance/ action steps (prevention, diagnosis)

  14. Motivated intentions: • Seek additional information • Talk to doctor/ friend/partner about HPV • Get regular Pap tests (women) • Be more cautious re. partner selection Unintended Reactions: • Desire to ‘get tested for HPV’ • Feelings of helplessness/frustration (men) Trusted HPV information sources: • Public health/government, healthcare providers, hospitals, clinics • Some participants expressed distrust of government sources

  15. Content Recommendations/Revisions • Target messages to minimize audience anxiety & stigma: • Promote HPV as a common but important issue to know about • Be upfront about transmission of HPV, but don’t lead with it • Call-to-action should not emphasize urgent behavior change • Provide action steps for HPV, CC & STI prevention/risk reduction • Use statistics to convey high HPV prevalence • Add messaging to clarify identified points of confusion & address unintended reactions, e.g.,: • Highlight info for men, reinforcing rarity of health consequences • Disseminate through trusted community-based organizations

  16. Conclusions • HPV science may be inherently stigmatizing & confusing to audiences • This may have implications for current & future prevention efforts • A normalizing approach to HPV = most effective for maximizing audience awareness & empowerment, while minimizing undue fear/stigma & motivating information-seeking • Posters & booklets are available through CDC; currently being expanded • Broader communication effort developed to support this effort

  17. Herschel Lawson (CDC) Margo Gillman (Ogilvy PR) Yolan Laporte (Ogilvy PR) Jenny Mullen (Ogilvy PR) Karen Toll (Ogilvy PR) Emily Yu (Ogilvy PR) Ogilvy PR Creative Team Roxanne Barrow (CDC) Mona Saraiya (CDC) Amy Pulver (CDC) John Douglas (CDC) Lily Blasini-Alcivar (CDC) Susan Delisle (CDC) Donna McCree (CDC) Acknowledgments

  18. For More Information 1-800-CDC-INFO www.cdc.gov/std/hpv Allison Friedman (404) 639-8537 alf8@cdc.gov

More Related