1 / 15

The Participant Perception Indicator: A Compentency Based Elementary Teacher Preparation Program Model

The Participant Perception Indicator: A Compentency Based Elementary Teacher Preparation Program Model. Carl Berger University of Michigan carl.berger@umich.edu. What’s a PPI?.

bette
Download Presentation

The Participant Perception Indicator: A Compentency Based Elementary Teacher Preparation Program Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Participant Perception Indicator:A Compentency Based Elementary Teacher Preparation Program Model Carl Berger University of Michigan carl.berger@umich.edu

  2. What’s a PPI? • The Participant Perception Indicator (PPI) is a tool to help evaluate and/or assess growth in competence of elementary school teachers. • The PPI contains a questionnaire of several pages that measures perceptions of knowledge, experience and confidence of themes determined important for teaching elementary school.

  3. The Participant Perception Indicator... • Can measure multiple times: before, during and after teacher preparation • Looks at themes as well as individual competencies • Measures cognitive, behavioral and affective • May be analyzed by repeated measures test and profile analysis

  4. What is it… • A booklet of statements for response. • A series of Likert scales • Parallel statements of perception of knowledge, experience and confidence based on themes with statements reflecting themes.

  5. Background • Developed in 1974 to examine pre-service and in-service teachers competence in teaching • Used in the Michigan Dept of Education study of the effectiveness of competency based teacher education.

  6. Instruction page forInstructional Competency Self Perception

  7. Instruction page forsupervisors to compare observed competency and opportunity to observe competency

  8. Students took PPI each semester in Jr and Sr year and once following during teaching. We used the results to observe changes over time. Supervisors used measure to compare observed use of competence with opportunity to observe so we could compare student self perceptions with external observations. Procedure

  9. Values of knowledge, confidence and experience of each theme were averaged to produce an overall theme Profiles were developed to show changes over time. Comparisons of observed and opportunity to observe were averaged to produce overall themes T-tests were used to find if students used competency if the opportunity was available. Analysis

  10. Theme was ‘Using assessment for diagnosis’ • Used profile analysis, (just became available for main frame computing) • Conclusions were developed for each theme and reports on the conclusion were used to modify the State of Michigan Competency Based Teacher Education program.

  11. Sample profile High perception Low perception

  12. Conclusions • Significant growth of perception occurred till actual teaching! • Perception of experience highest in student teaching and much lower upon inservice • Comparison of observed and perception of competence was conservative, students perceived less competence than was observed by supervisor.

  13. Use of the PPI • The PPI was able to discriminate among the measures. • It could be used a conservative measure of actual competence. • Allowed for formative and summative evaluation.

  14. References to other uses of the PPI All references are hyperlinked to full reports • Berger, C., Kerner, N., & Lee, J. (1999) Understanding Student Perceptions of Collaboration, Laboratory and Inquiry Use in Introductory Chemistry, Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Long Beach, CA. • Berger, C., & Barritt, M. (1997) Evaluation of the Location Independent Learning and Teaching Course:Economics of Networks, Process Survey, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. • Berger, C. and E. Carlson (1988). "Measuring computer literacy of teacher trainers." Journal of Educational Computing Research4(9): 289-303.

  15. So that’s it… • For more information • The latest on PPI and files • and… updated monthly ideas for evaluation and assessment… • Go to… • http://carat.umich.edu • and click on assessment and evaluation

More Related