Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Isotopic Analysis of Austin Surface Water and Storm Discharge PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Isotopic Analysis of Austin Surface Water and Storm Discharge

Isotopic Analysis of Austin Surface Water and Storm Discharge

435 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Isotopic Analysis of Austin Surface Water and Storm Discharge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Isotopic Analysis of Austin Surface Water and Storm Discharge Lance Christian CE 394K - Surface Water Hydrology April 29, 1999

  2. Outline • Background on Isotopes • Rb - Sr Isotope System • Case Study of Selected Austin Storm • Events

  3. What is an isotope? • They are atoms which have the same number of protons but • different numbers of neutrons • e.g. 84Sr, 86Sr, 87Sr, and 88Sr • Therefore, the mass number (protons + neutrons) varies due to • increasing amounts of neutrons while the atomic number (number • of protons) remains constant.

  4. Why do we use isotopes? • “Isotopes are everywhere.” • Isotopes may behave comparatively/differently within the same • isotope family - fractionation is a very important tool. • They can provide both age determinations as well as • environmental data such as temperature, flow patterns, degree of • alteration. • In hydrologic studies (e.g. storm discharge), one can expect • concentration to vary with flow, however, isotope ratios will not • vary unless affected by other variables (e.g. flow paths or a • change in contributing sources)

  5. Isotope Systems of Interest: Radiogenic IsotopesStable Isotopes Sm/Nd Oxygen Re/Os Hydrogen K/Ar Carbon U-Th-Pb Sulfur Rb/Sr Nitrogen

  6. Rubidium / Strontium System • Rubidium (element 37) is an alkali metal belonging to Group • IA giving it a +1 ionic charge. It has two naturally occurring • isotopes 85Rb and 87Rb whose isotopic abundances are 72.2% • and 27.8% respectively. • Strontium (element 38) is a member of the alkaline earths of • Group IIA giving it a +2 ionic charge. It has four naturally • occurring isotopes: 84Sr, 86Sr, 87Sr, 88Sr whose isotopic • abundances are 0.6%, 9.9%, 7.0%, and 82.5% respectively.

  7. Rubidium / Strontium System • Rb has an ionic radius of 1.48Å compared to that of K (1.33Å). • Given that both elements are members of the alkali metals group, • meaning they both have a +1 ionic charge, the Rb often • substitutes for K in the crystal lattice of K bearing minerals. • Sr often substitutes for Ca (ionic radius of 1.13Å and 0.99Å • respectively) in lattice sites and can form its own minerals. • e.g. SrCO3 and SrSO4

  8. Rubidium to Strontium Decay Scheme where: ß-is a beta particle  is an antineutrino Q is the decay energy = 0.275 MeV

  9. Strontium Seawater Curve - Burke et al. (1982)

  10. Analysis of Austin Surface Water • Compare high discharge events to baseflow. • Is there a trend? Differences between isotopic ratios • of natural baseflow vs.. storm runoff induced by impermeable • surface coverage. • Can a signal be found relating to the discharge hydrograph?

  11. Geology of the Area • West Austin bedrock is comprised of a number of limestone • units • Edwards Fm. • Bee Creek Member • Bull Creek Member • Glen Rose Fm. • Central Austin is crosscut by a series of normal faults resulting • from subsidence in the Gulf. The bedrock geology of central • Austin is therefore complex but is generally comprised • of limestone and shale/clays.

  12. Location of Sampling Sites Tan: West Bull Creek Watershed Yellow: Bull Creek Watershed Pink: Shoal Creek Watershed Green: Waller Creek Watershed Sampling sites are bright green circles

  13. 87Sr/86Sr Ratios Plotted with Storm Discharge Gage Height Data

  14. Conclusions • Isotope ratios do appear to be affected by an increase in discharge • e.g. storm events. • The effects of the Sr ratio variances are believed to be attributable • to input from storm runoff which are otherwise “outside sources” • The contributing runoff sources are believed to be predominantly • impervious surface coverage coupled with potential anthropogenic • effects. • The next stage is to look for spatial patterns as well as using • conventional cation data for an independent verification.