Why does succession take so long
Download
1 / 48

Why does succession take so long? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 184 Views
  • Uploaded on

Why does succession take so long?. Different plant species have different ecological requirements. A beech or live-oak needs shade as a seedling. They also need soil moisture which means the soil must have a high organic content.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Why does succession take so long?' - baba


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Why does succession take so long
Why does succession take so long?

  • Different plant species have different ecological requirements. A beech or live-oak needs shade as a seedling.

  • They also need soil moisture which means the soil must have a high organic content.

  • So succession is also the development of soil and colonization by soil organisms.


3 models of succession connell and slatyer 1979
3 models of successionConnell and Slatyer (1979)


Facilitation
Facilitation

  • Initially thought that all succession was due to facilitation.

    Example of facilitation: shade provided by pines allows seedlings of broad-leaved trees to survive.

    Or

    Growth of a nitrogen-fixing plant on sandy (nutrient poor) soils such as alder enriches the soil sufficiently for other species to colonize.


Tolerance
Tolerance

  • All species could live at all stages of the succession, but differing dispersal abilities/adaptations ensures earliest stages occupied by pioneer-type species.

  • As succession proceeds fewer and fewer of the early successional species can tolerate the new conditions and so the system matures toward D.

  • Dispersal distance is therefore also a big factor to be considered.


Inhibition
Inhibition

  • Species mutually inhibit one another through competition. System can only change when an individual dies an is replaced.

  • What will influence that replacement?


Soil maturity and succession
Soil maturity and succession

  • Soil accumulates organic matter as succession proceeds.

  • Increased ability to hold moisture.

  • Pioneer species are shaded out.


The balance
The balance

  • Now understood that facilitation, tolerance, and inhibition all combine to produce succession.


Clements vs gleason
Clements vs Gleason

  • We now know that species respond individualistically to change.

  • Communities are not superorganisms and will not always return to a predictable equilibrium.



Colonization of a new area
Colonization of a new area

  • Follows succession from pioneers to competitors…..but all have to disperse there.

  • Distance from source is important…can larvae survive long enough to be transported there? Can seeds be blown there? Can mammals swim there? Can birds fly there?


Two ways to study succession
Two ways to study succession

  • Follow one location from disturbance to maturity, ex. Krakatau, Mt St Helens.

  • Select similar habitats at different times since similar disturbance, ex. Glacier Bay, building riverbank


Intertidal succession
Intertidal succession

  • Macroalgal succession over 30 months on experimental concrete blocks.

Ulva

Sea lettuce


Primary succession in glacier bay alaska
Primary succession in Glacier Bay, Alaska

  • Steadily retreating glacier since 1850s.

  • New land surface revealed…primary succession.

  • Oldest succession where ice first retreated.

1912

1850


Glacier bay succession
Glacier Bay Succession

  • Retreating glaciers expose new land surface of till.

  • Rate of retreat ca. 65 km in 200 years

  • Succession follows broadly predictable path


Nutrient changes at glacier bay
Nutrient changes at Glacier Bay

  • The initial soil is nutrient poor.

  • Alder is an N-fixer, spruce and hemlock are not.

  • “forest floor” reflects N in leaf and wood litter.

  • Why is there a peak in forest floor N at the transition to spruce-hemlock.

  • Why does soil N decline in the spruce-hemlock zone?


At least that has been the accepted story but
AT least that has been the accepted story..BUT!

  • Fastie (1995, Ecology) shows that alder may actually slow the succession through competition.

  • The succession to Sitka Spruce was much faster in the sites deglaciated in the 1780s-1840s than the later sites.

  • And hemlock has not begun to grow at any site that initiated after 1840.


Simulation showing nitrogen inputs during 2ndry succession
Simulation showing nitrogen inputs during 2ndry succession

Importance of alder (ALRU) as a nitrogen fixer and Ceanothus (CEVE), early in succession.





Rotmoos glacier italian alps
Rotmoos Glacier, Italian alps

  • 1895 glacial tongue evident in valley

  • 1999 2km of retreat evident

  • Following is work by Kauffman, Ecology (2001)


First 50 yrs

5 yrs: Harvestman-

a glacial specialist

Predator.

10 yrs: 4 spp. Of ground beetle, occupying separate niches.

20 yrs: assorted spiders

Abundant.

30 yr Centipedes, under rocks

50 yrs: herbivorous beetles as vegetation density increases.

First 50 yrs

  • Sparse vegetation means little local productivity.

  • Surprisingly, insects are primarily predators relying on allochthonous (derived from elsewhere) sources of prey


50 150 yrs first appearances
50-150 yrs first appearances

70 yr: millipedes

are important

decomposers.

100 yrs: 1 sp.

Of ant occupies

sunniest locations

140 yrs: Densest

Vegetation

supports

grasshoppers

  • As vegetation increases in density a more normal insect spectrum is represented with food chains supported by herbivores. Detrital cycle also evident. System now autochthonous (productivity is local).


Effect of succession on adjacent waters
Effect of succession on adjacent waters

  • Shading of margins

  • As succession increases soil organic content will also increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), e.g. humic acids and tannins.

  • Leaching into waterways these chemicals color the water and reduce transparency.


Dissolved organic carbon e g humic acids influences aquatic foodchains
Dissolved Organic Carbon, e.g humic acids influences aquatic foodchains

Macro

Zooplankton

Spp.#

2

3-4

5

DOC

Low

Moderate

High


Mt st helens example of interference
Mt St. Helens example of interference foodchains

  • Lupins are N fixers and were colonists after the Mt St. Helens eruption.

  • Lupin expansion rapid at first but slowed after a few years.

Fagan & Bishop

(American Naturalist 2000)


Interactive effects of herbivory and predation
Interactive effects of herbivory and predation foodchains

  • At expansion edge Lupin expansion limited by herbivory.

  • In center of lupin range herbivory limited by predation.


This river is building a spit
This river is building a spit foodchains

  • As the spit grows the youngest vegetation will be on the tip.

  • Often a clear succession, both in terms of age and species composition, is evident.


Succession in streams rivers
Succession in streams &rivers foodchains

  • Note the change in size and species composition beside the channel


Can we make predictions about the colonization process
Can we make predictions about the colonization process? foodchains

  • Here is an island.

  • Most plants are going to arrive either by wind, sea, or bird/bat.


Krakatau case study
Krakatau case study foodchains

  • Krakatau is an island group in Indonesia.

  • A volcanic eruption sterilized the islands in 1883.


Krakatau the best example of primary succession
Krakatau: The best example of primary succession foodchains

  • Aug 27th 1883 Volcanic explosion sterilized islands

  • 2000 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

  • Generated tsunami that killed 36,000 people

  • 100 m thickness of new ash coated the islands…new land surface. A natural laboratory.

  • Colonization of plants and animals documented since 1884.

Krakatau is west

of Java


Immediately after the eruption
Immediately after the eruption foodchains

  • 1884: no plant life found, some blue-green algae growing on ash.

  • 1896: there were some coastal shrubs, scattered grasses and shrubs in the interior.

  • 1908: Interior a “parkland” of grasses and clumps of trees.


The succession continues
The succession continues foodchains

  • 1928-1932: forests close over the grassland.

  • 1979-1992: forests changing in species composition. Earliest trees now 60-80 years old.


Increase in species diversity
Increase in species diversity foodchains

  • Plant species continue to colonize the islands.

  • New plants provide new opportunities for animals.

  • Animals cannot colonize until foodplant is present.


Pattern evident in dispersal mechanism of arrivals
Pattern evident in dispersal mechanism of arrivals foodchains

  • At first wind and sea dispersed species.

  • Later trees dominated by bird and bat dispersed species.

  • Wind dispersal still brings orchids and ferns.



Development of structure
Development of structure mainland

  • As succession proceeds the physical structure of the vegetation becomes more complex, offering more niches. Trunk-cavities, vines, larger limbs.

  • How would this affect recruitment?


Why structure matters
Why structure matters mainland

  • The more layers in the canopy the higher the animal diversity.Offer different feeding opportunities.

  • Trunk-cavities provide nest sites for birds and insects.

  • Vines provide food, cover and nest sites.

  • Dead wood for decomposers

  • Larger limbs better attachment sites for epiphytes.


Biotic and abiotic influences
Biotic and abiotic influences mainland

  • Nitrogen likely to be limiting nutrient early in succession….why?



How habitat quality influences succession
How habitat quality influences succession secondary succession

  • Walker and Chapin’s model considers the importance of major ecological factors in succession in terms of severe and favorable landscapes.


Walker and chapin cont
Walker and Chapin Cont. secondary succession

  • Note how differently facilitation and competition influence succession.


ad