UEL’s Assessment and Feedback Policy. David Rowley Associate Dean, School of Health, Sport and Bioscience Academic Practice and Student Experience. Context. Context. Assessment + Engagement Policy. Introduction Assessment Design Assessment, Moderation and Marking
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Associate Dean, School of Health, Sport and Bioscience
Academic Practice and Student Experience
The Policy applies to ALL UEL programmes within the UEL Academic Framework
Principles of assessment:
Exemptions require written approval of the Chair of University Learning and Teaching Committee
UEL’s Standard Referencing System
is Cite Them Right (Harvard)
or APA for students
studying programmes in the
School of Psychology.
UEL defines academic misconduct as any behaviour:
“likely to confer an unfair advantage in assessment, whether by advantaging the alleged offender or disadvantaging (deliberately or unconsciously) another or others”
(UEL Manual of General Regulations, 2010, Part 8 Academic Misconduct, 8.2.1)
The submission of material (written, visual or oral), originally produced by another person or persons or oneself, without due acknowledgement, so that the work could be assumed to be the student's own … includes incorporation of significant extracts or elements taken from the work of (an)other(s) or oneself, without acknowledgement or reference
The submission of work produced in collaboration for an assignment based on the assessment of individual work.
School Responsible Officers:
Academic Misconduct Officer: