1 / 13

Group A Membership

Group A Membership. Erv Blythe (Virginia Tech) Javad Boroumand (Cisco) Steve Corbat ó (Internet2) Wendy Huntoon (Pittsburgh SC, chair) Ron Johnson (Washington) Michael Krugman (Boston University) Rick Summerhill (Internet2) Doug Van Houweling (Internet2). Charge.

autumn-koch
Download Presentation

Group A Membership

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group A Membership • Erv Blythe (Virginia Tech) • Javad Boroumand (Cisco) • Steve Corbató (Internet2) • Wendy Huntoon (Pittsburgh SC, chair) • Ron Johnson (Washington) • Michael Krugman (Boston University) • Rick Summerhill (Internet2) • Doug Van Houweling (Internet2)

  2. Charge • Analyze NLR, Internet2, & RON service plans • Identify technical and operational requirements and overlap • Identify areas where current or planned infrastructure falls short of requirements • Propose changes that would close the gap and enable convergence

  3. Potential Services & Capabilities

  4. Group B Membership • Javad Boroumand (Cisco) • Bill Decker (Iowa) • Dave Farber (Carnegie-Mellon) • Tracy Futhey (Duke) • Ron Hutchins (Georgia Tech) • Greg Jackson (Chicago, chair) • Ron Johnson (Washington) • Larry Landweber (Wisconsin) • Jack McCredie (Berkeley) • Doug Van Houweling (Internet2) • Tom West (National LambdaRail)

  5. Charge (part 3) • Propose one or more aggregation schemes that group the activities effectively • Schemes may correspond to the current Internet2, NLR, and RONs, but this is neither a requirement nor a goal • Each scheme should satisfy the diverse organizational requirements while minimizing overall complexity

  6. Issues • Mission • Organization • Resources • Coherence and comprehensibility • Researcher relationships

  7. Membership Governance Network Services Finances Partnerships Research Other Activities Culture Differentiating Dimensions

  8. Status Quo (per Group A)

  9. Allocation

  10. Procreation

  11. Integration

  12. Antelope Freeway, ½ Mile • Report, ~mid-June • recommendations, if consensus • Board & Council discussions, ~summer • joint? • Implementation, ~fall

  13. The Bottom Line • Both Internet2 and NLR have evolved to meet real present and future requirements of the research and education advanced networking community • We must and will collaborate to respond to those requirements in an effective and organizationally efficient fashion

More Related