1 / 24

T cell responses are initiated in the T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs

T cell responses are initiated in the T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs. Proliferation and Differentiation. Effector T cells. Memory T cells. CD4+ Th2. CD8+ Cytotoxic. CD4+ Th1. Over the last 25 years, dendritic cells (DC) have emerged

arnaud
Download Presentation

T cell responses are initiated in the T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. T cell responses are initiated in the T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs Proliferation and Differentiation Effector T cells Memory T cells CD4+ Th2 CD8+ Cytotoxic CD4+ Th1 Over the last 25 years, dendritic cells (DC) have emerged as the major APC involved in this process

  2. T cell and APC priming • Origin and heterogeneity of DCs • Maturation of DCs • T cell priming by DCs • Role of DCs in Tolerance induction

  3. DCs progenitors are generated in the bone marrow. They give rise to circulating DCs precursors. Circulating DCs precursors enter nonlymphoid tissues as immature DCs. DC are scattered throughout all non lymphoid tissues where they reside in a resting, (so-called immature) state. In the absence of ongoing inflammatory and immune responses, they constantly migrate at low rate to draining lymph nodes. DCs precursors DCs progenitors Immature DCs In inflammatory conditions, immature DC migrate to draining lymph nodes where after maturation (mature DC), they prime the rare circulating naïve antigen-specific lymphocytes. Mature DCs

  4. There are no lineage-specific surface markers that are expressed on all DC. Moreover, DC are a heterogenous cell population. However, it has been clearly demonstrated that at least 3 distinct types of DC can be generated. Mice: myeloid DC CD11b+CD11c+, myeloid DC CD11b+ CD11c+/-, CD4+, lymphoid DC CD11b- CD8a+ The existence of different subsets of DC has lead to possibility that they can perform unique functions.

  5. Feature of Immature DC = Antigen-capturing cell Immature DC are very efficient in Ag uptake and processing. Antigens are taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis (FcR, C-type lectin receptors,scavenger receptors etc) or by macropinocytosis and phagocytosis. MHC class II-rich compartments are abundant. These late endosomal structures contain the HLA-DM (H-2M in mice) products which enhance and edit peptide binding to MHC class II molecules. Secrete proteases that may degrade external Ag into peptides that can be loaded directly onto empty MHC class II on the surface of the DC. Figure 1:Three pathways for loading major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules with peptides in dendritic cells.a, b, Antigen is captured by an antigen receptor, and together antigen and antigen receptor are internalized. In MHC-class-II-positive compartments, the antigen is processed, generating peptides, some of which will be presented on the surface of the dendritic cell in complex with an MHC class II molecule. a, Newly synthesized MHC class II molecules are transported from their site of synthesis through the Golgi into the class-II-positive compartments, where they meet their peptide cargo. b, Class II molecules may be recycled from the cell surface into the correct compartments, where again they are loaded with peptide. c, extracellular proteases may degrade external antigens, generating peptides that can be loaded directly onto empty MHC class II molecules on the surface of the dendritic cell. Davoust J.and Banchereau J. Naked antigen-presenting molecules on dendritic cells Nature Cell Biology 2:E46-E48, 2000.

  6. Exogenous Ag leads exclusively to presentation on MHC class II molecules. • How class I-restricted immune responses are generated by DC which take up exogenous Ags? • Exogenous Ags may also be presented by MHC class I molecules, a phenomenon referred to • as cross-presentation. • Presentation of endogenous Ags by MHC class I molecules: • Ubiquitinated proteins, proteosome degradation, resulting peptides are transported to the ER by • TAP and loaded on new MHC class I molecules, Golgi, plasma membrane. • Two main intracellular pathways for cross-presentation have been reported: • TAP-independent: requires the presence of MHC class I molecules in the endocytic pathway. • Low endosomal ph allows peptides generated in endosomes to exchange with endogenous peptides • bound to recycling MHC class I molecules. • TAP-dependent: This pathway requires transport of internalized Ags from endocytic • compartments to the cytosol. DCs have a unique endosome-to-cytosol transport pathway that • allows selective delivery of internalized Ags to the cytosol.

  7. The Ag/pathogen induces the immature DC to undergo pheno- typic and functional changes that culminate in the complete transition from Ag-capturing cell to an APC (maturation). What are the stimuli that activate immmature DCs? There are different views as to the nature of DC-activating stimuli. These views need not be mutually exclusive In 1989, Janaway postulated that: APCs possess receptors Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) that recognize and are triggered by evolutionarily conserved molecules expressed by pathogens that are not found in higher eukaryotes. These molecules have essential roles in the biology of the invading agent. These molecules are called Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs).

  8. Reis e Sousa, C. Dendritic cells as sensors of infection Immunity 14:495-498, 2001.

  9. A natural extension of Janaway’s hypothesis is that DCs might be activated by signals • made by other cells in response to PAMPs. Many tisssues may have their own PRR and • produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to infection. • Examples: • Virally infected cells produce interferons in response to dsRNA. Interferons • act to activate DCs. • Keratinocytes can secrete TNF-a, IL-1 and IL-18 all of which activate Langerhans cells • a type of skin and mucosal DC. DCs express receptors for inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, • IFNs and IL-1. • In response to Taxoplasma gondii, endothelial cells produce chemokines that can • activate DCs. • The Danger Hypothesis • Matzinger, has proposed that DC activation does not need to involve PRRs, but instead • receptors for self-molecules normally sequestered in intra-cellular compartments of • healthy cells but are released when cells are stressed or die by necrosis (danger). • Examples: • Mammalian heat-shock proteins (HSPs) can activate DCs and are released from necrotic • but not from apoptotic cells. DCs express CD91 which binds to HSPs. • Other intracellular components shown to activate DCs include nucleotides (ATP)

  10. Reis e Sousa, C. Dendritic cells as sensors of infection Immunity 14:495-498, 2001.

  11. Phenotypic and functional changes that occur during the maturation process of DCs. • Antigen Presentation • While maturing, DCs shut off antigen capture and class II synthesis. The MHC complexes • accumulate on the cell surface and acquire extremely long half-lives ( 100 hours). • The peptide-MHC II complexes are retained for several days maximizing presentation of • those Ags associated with the infectious organism that triggered the maturation process. Hartgers F.C., Figdor C.G. and Adema G.J. Towards a molecular understanding of dendritic cell immunobiology Immunol. Today 21:542-544, 2000.

  12. Migration • Maturing DCs migrate into the T cell area of lymphoid organs. Immature Dcs express a variety of chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR5, CXCR1 and CCR6) that participate in their recruitment to inflammed tissue and/or to allow their residency into non-lymphoid tissue. Exemple: Imm. Dcs express CCR6 the receptor for MIP-3a that is constitutively express in liver and lungs. Upon maturation, there is a downregulation of receptors for chemokines produced at the site of inflammation and upregulation of CCR7. SLC is a ligand for CCR7 and is expressed at high levels by HEVs in LNs and by stromal cells in T cell areas of many secondary lymphoid organs. ELC (other ligand of CCR7) made in T cell areas of lymphoid tissue. SLC (6Ckine) and ELC (MIP-3b) act together to direct DC migration to T cell areas Of lymphoid tissue and to promote encounter with T cells. Adhesion molecules Banchereau J. et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells Ann. Rev. Immunol. 18:767-811, 2000.

  13. DC T cell CD4 or CD8 1=Anergy 1 1+2=Full activation TCR MHC 2 COSTIMULATION • Induction of costimulatory molecules Mature DCs can initiate primary T cell-mediated immune responses because they express high amounts of MHC complexes (signal 1) and costimulatory molecules (signal 2).

  14. Induction of survival molecules Maturation stimuli upregulate the expression of molecules that can transduce survival signals. CD40 and RANK are ligands express by DCs that recognize, respectively, CD40-L and TRANCE expressed on T cells. Mature DCs have a finite life expectancy, which affects their ability to stimulate T cells. There is evidence that once they have reach the LN, DCs survive for only a few days. It has been shown that activated T cells, expressing CD40-L and TRANCE, can trigger CD40 and RANK on DCs, thereby enhancing their viability. Thus, feedback signals from T cells can also provide signals that reinforce the maturation process. Lanzavecchia A. and Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells Science 290:92-97, 2000.

  15. The encounter with an infectious organism requires not only that an • immune response be initiated but also that it be of the appropriate class. • Examples: • Th2-dominated responses play a role in immunity to helminths • Th1 responses are critical to eliminate many intracellular pathogens • such as Listeria or Toxoplasma gondii. • Thus it is essential that the APC both alert T cells to the presence of infection and also • transmit information about the nature of the infectious organism. • Much of this information is transmitted by cytokines (signal 3).

  16. The first experimental evidence that DCs have the capacity to induce different types of T cell-mediated responses came from the observation that DCs are the most relevant source of the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12. If all DCs produce IL-12, how could a Th-2 response ever be induced? Distinct DC subsets elicit distinct Th responses: In mice: Lymphoid DCs Th1 (DC1) IL-12 +++++ Myeloid DCs Th2 (DC2) IL-12 +/- In humans: Lymphoid DCs Th2 (DC2) IL-12 +/- Myeloid DCs Th1 (DC1) IL-12 +++++ Although human and mice are opposites in terms of the functional classification of DC subsets, studies showed the existence of a high IL-12-producing subset that induces Th1 responses and a low IL-12-producing subset that induces Th2 responses.

  17. The realization that distinct subsets of DCs can regulate immune • responses differentially has been accompanied by the opposing • revelation that a single type of DC can make different cytokines • depending on the microenvironment in which the DC has been • activated or the pathogen. • Examples: • DC1 stimulated in vitro in the presence of IL-10, TGFb or PGE2 • can induce Th2 differentiation. • At the yeast stage, Candida albicans stimulates DCs to produce • IL-12 and induce Th1 responses. At the hyphea stage, C. albicans • stimulate DC to produce IL-4 and induce Th2 responses. Thus, the type of T cell-response induced by DCs depends on the nature of the DC-activating stimulus, and not so much on their ontogeny. or, by modulating the production of IL-12 by DCs, different maturation stimuli play an instructive role for Th1 or Th2 responses.

  18. Figure 1. Regulation of T cell–mediated immune responses by DCs. (a) Evolutionary selection: two DC subsets develop via a myeloid and lymphoid pathways. These two DC subsets express different sets of pattern-recognition receptors in order to recognize different antigens. Myeloid DC1s produce a large amount of IL-12 during cognate T cell–DC interaction and preferentially induce TH1 differentiation. Lymphoid DC2s produce a lower amount of IL-12 during cognate T cell–DC interaction and preferentially induce TH2 differentiation. (b) Environmental instruction: each DC subset has a certain degree of flexibility in directing T cell responses. This depends on signals from pathogens and the microenvironment. Liu Y.-J., Kanzler H., Soumelis V. and Gilliet M. Dendritic cell lineage, plasticity and cross-regulation Nature Immunolgy 2:585-589, 2001.

  19. The role of DCs in the induction of peripheral self-tolerance Situation: During an infection there is extensive death of infected cells. DCs are well-known to engulf dying cells and they should process and present self-antigens. How do DCs focus immunity on the infectious organism if they also present self-antigens? How come that T cells reactive to self-antigens are not activated during an infection?

  20. Experimental evidences that peripheral tolerance to tissue Ags involved bone-marrow • derived cells in draining lymph nodes : • Influenza hemagglutinin (HA) expressed in many tissues as self-Ag. • Injected TCR transgenic HA-specific CD4+T cells are anergized. • Induction of anergy required bone-marrow derived cells that express the • appropriate MHC. Anergy did not develop if only nonhematopoietic cells expressed the • appropriate MHC. (Adler et al. J. Exp. Med. 187:1555, 1998) • OVA expressed in pancreatic islets. OVA is presented by bone- • marrow derived cells and TCR transgenic OVA-specific CD8+T cells • were tolerized by deletion. They showed that the tolerizing, bone marrow derived cells • were confined to the draining lymph nodes. (Kurts et al.J. Exp. Med. 184:923, 1996 and • J. Exp. Med. 186:239, 1997). • Somehow, self-Ags in peripheral tissues are transferred tobone-marrow derived cells • in the draining LN and this tolerizes adult T cells. • DCs in afferent lymph carry apoptotic bodies derived from the intestinal • epithelium. (Huang et al. J. Exp. Med.191:423, 2000) • DCs pick up apoptotic material from cells undergoing the turnover • characteristic of most tissues and continually deliver samples of tissues • to the draining LN.

  21. DCs that phagocytose apoptotic cells are not induced to mature into • strong stimulator of T cell immunity.In contrast to DCs that phagocytose • cells that are dying by necrosis.Sauter et al. J. Exp. Med.191:423, 2000. • DCs only take up apoptotic cells when immature • (Inaba et al. J. Exp. Med. 188:2163, 1998; Albert et al. J. Exp. Med. 188:1359, 1998) • Apoptotic cells do not mature the DCs • (Sauter et al. J. Exp. Med.191:423, 2000) • Immature DCs are poor T cell stimulators • (Schuler et al.J. Exp. Med.161:526, 1985. Then, what is the immunological consequence of the presentation of self-antigens derived from the processing of a large number of dying somatic cells in the LN? Null (only clearance) or induction of Self-tolerance?

  22. Null ? We know that bone-marrow derived cells within the LN can tolerize T cells to peptides (neo-self-Ags) synthesized in other tisues. Induction of self-tolerance? • Immature DCs do not express abundantly peptide-MHC complexes • on their surface. Self-reactive T cells would not be able to recognize • their ligand on immature DCs. • Immature DCs lack CD40 and TRANCE-R that sustain viability for • the 3-4 days needed before T cell tolerance becomes evident.

  23. Hypothesis: Short-lived migratory DCs are processed and presented by LN resident DCs (lymphoid DCs). These DCs express high levels of peptide MHC complexes and low levels of costimulatory molecules. LDCs  Anergy, deletion or regulatory T cells (Treg) that suppress the activation of self-reactive T cells. Steinman R.M., Turley S., Mellman I., and Inaba K. The induction of tolerance by dendritic cells that have captured apoptotic cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:411-416, 2000.

  24. SUMMARY Lanzavecchia A. and Sallusto F. From synapses to immunological memory: the role of sustained T cell stimulation Curr. Opin. in Immunol. 12:92-98, 2000.

More Related