1 / 16

WP2 Data Delivery Broad splits of countries

Good data coverage Austria Belgium Finland Netherlands UK Germany Recent data coverage Spain Denmark France Italy Czech Rep., Poland, Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia. No data as yet US Greece Portugal Ireland Sweden Luxembourg. WP2 Data Delivery Broad splits of countries.

Download Presentation

WP2 Data Delivery Broad splits of countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Good data coverage Austria Belgium Finland Netherlands UK Germany Recent data coverage Spain Denmark France Italy Czech Rep., Poland, Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia No data as yet US Greece Portugal Ireland Sweden Luxembourg WP2 Data DeliveryBroad splits of countries Time series Industry disaggregations Breaks Sources (individual versus establishments)

  2. Good data coverage - employment • Austria • 1976-2004 • Employed and self employed separately • Source: labour force survey,Statistics Austria • One datafile – no problematic classification changes? • 71 industries (exact match to EUK – extra territorial organisations missing) • Data stored in Prodsys format • Belgium • 1975-2003 • Salaried and non-salaried workforce separately • Source: National Accounts consistent, subdivided on the basis of social security sources and non-published sources • One datafile – no problematic classification changes? • EUK 72 industry list match (incl. aggregates) • Data not yet in Prodsys format

  3. Good data coverage - employment • Finland • 1970-2004 • Employees and self employed separately • Source: National Accounts data (including unpublished data) • Three datafiles – three classification changes? Some gaps, missing/imputed self employed data in the early years? • 61 industries covered for early period, post 1995 to EUK 72 • Data stored in Prodsys format • Netherlands • 1969-2003 • Employees and self employed separately • Sources: Statistics Netherlands and CPB • 49 industries • Data stored in Prodsys format

  4. Good data coverage - employment • UK • 1970-2003 • Employed and self employed separately from 1984 onwards, • Competing datafiles over the whole period – LFS likely to be benchmark from 1984 onwards • Sources: LFS, ABI, AAS, Census of Employment • Industry lists change in 1968 and 1980 and 1992 • 100+ industries matched into EUK 72 • Most of the data stored in Prodsys format • Germany • 1970-2003 • Employed and self employed separately • Sources: National Accounts - Statistisches Bundesam • Both 60 (59) and 30 industry classifications matched to EUK 72 • Older data available to 55 industries • Data mostly conforms to Prodsys, though not so for the early years

  5. Recent data coverage - employment • Spain • 1993-2004 • Employed and self employed separately • Sources: LFS, Spanish National Statistics Institute and Industrial Firm Survey • Exact match to EUK 72 Industry • Data stored in Prodsys format • Denmark • 1990-2001 • AVERAGE HOURS ONLY

  6. Recent data coverage - employment • France • 1990-2003 • Employed and self employed (and unregistered work) physical persons and full time equivalent • Sources: ISEE published data, nb. some restricted data • EUK72 Industry (including aggregates) • Data stored in Prodsys format • Italy • 1992-2003 • Employment data split by detail – blue collar, white collar, self employed….etc. Full time equivalent only • Source - ? • 30 industry split, not yet matched to EUK industry • Not yet in Prodsys format

  7. Recent data coverage - employment • Czech Rep., Poland, Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia • Poland – from 1995, data available in persons, FTEs and self employed to NACE 30 (Source?) • Czech Rep – from 1995, data available in persons, FTEs and self employed to EUKLEMS breakdown as far as possible (Source?) • Hungary – 1992-2003, employees and self employed to NACE 2 digit level (source: LFS?) • Slovak Rep – 1995-2003, employed and self employed to NACE 60 • Slovenia – 1997-2003 full time/part time and employed and self employed split, LFS, 2-digit NACE • Not yet to Prodsys format • This is probably the best we can do here

  8. Hours data • Storage system varies – some as an extra worksheet, some as an extra ‘asset/employment type’, some as separate files. We need to standardise this.

  9. Good data coverage - hours • Austria • 1980-2004 • Total hours worked employed and self employed combined • Source: labour force survey, Statistics Austria • One datafile – no problematic classification changes? • 71 industries (exact match to EUK – extra territorial organisations missing) • Data stored as an asset in the data sheet • Belgium • 1995-2002 • Hours worked, salaried only • Source: non published National Accounts, compatible with published version • One datafile – no problematic classification changes? • EUK 72 industry list match (incl. aggregates) • Data not yet in Prodsys format

  10. Good data coverage - hours • Finland • 1970-2004 • Hours by employees and self employed separately • Source: Statistics Finland/ National Accounts data (including unpublished data) • Three datafiles (separate from employment) – three classification changes? Some gaps? • 60 industries covered for early period (1970-74, 1975-94), post 1995 to EUK 72 • Data stored in Prodsys format • Netherlands • 1969-2004, • Employees and self employed separately • Sources: Statistics Netherlands and CPB • Competing data sources? • Data stored in separate sheets and then an additional data files from CBS for the more recent years self employed and employees separately • 49 industries • Data stored in Prodsys format

  11. Good data coverage - hours • UK • 1974-2003 • Employed and self employed separately from 1984 onwards, • Competing datafiles over the whole period – LFS likely to be benchmark from 1984 onwards • Sources: LFS and New Earnings Survey (now ASHE) • Industry lists change in 1968 and 1980 and 1992 • 100+ industries matched into EUK 72 • Most of the data stored in Prodsys format • Germany • 1991-2003 • Employed and self employed separately – lots of missing values • Sources: National Accounts - Statistisches Bundesam • Both 60 (59) and 30 industry classifications matched to EUK 72 • Data mostly conforms to Prodsys

  12. Recent data coverage - employment • Spain • 1993-2004 • Employed and self employed separately • Sources: LFS, Spanish National Statistics Institute and Industrial Firm Survey • Exact match to EUK 72 Industry • Data stored in Prodsys format • Denmark • 1990-2001 • Employed and self employed: average annual hours • Source: Statistics Denmark • 130 industries, matched to EUK72 (with weights) • Data stored in Prodsys format

  13. Recent data coverage - hours • France • 1990-2003 • Employed and self employed average and total hours provided. Stored in additional sheets • Sources: ISEE published data, nb. some restricted data • 104 industries matched to EUK72 Industry (including aggregates) • Data stored in Prodsys format • Italy • No hours data yet

  14. Recent data coverage - hours • Czech Rep., Poland, Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia • Poland – from 1997, data available by employed and self employed to NACE 30 (Source?) • Czech Rep – from 1995, data to ~60 industry breakdown (NACE), available by employed and self employed (Source?) • Hungary – 1992-2003, at NACE 2 shows average hours worked in a reference week by primary and second jobs (source: LFS?) • Slovak Rep – 1995-2003, hours worked to NACE 60, total employment • Slovenia – 1997-2003 average number of paid hours, 2-digit NACE National Survey on Earnings (some confidential data) • Not yet to Prodsys format • This is probably the best we can do here

  15. Issues • Missing Countries • Taking series back over time • Industry concordance with EUKLEMS • Industry matching over time - weighting • Gaps in detail • Consistent sources of data • Harmonising data from individual and employer based surveys?

More Related