the importance of edemocracy experiments l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The importance of eDemocracy experiments PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The importance of eDemocracy experiments

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

The importance of eDemocracy experiments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The importance of eDemocracy experiments * The picture in the PC, depicts the “ostrakon”: The fragment of a clay pot, used instead of ballot paper in the ancient Athenian Democracy “A 21st century organization for e-democracy”

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The importance of eDemocracy experiments' - JasminFlorian

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the importance of edemocracy experiments

The importance of eDemocracy experiments

* The picture in the PC, depicts the “ostrakon”: The fragment of a clay pot, used instead of ballot paper in the ancient Athenian Democracy


“A 21st century organization for e-democracy”

The access2democracy non-profit N.G.O. was established in Athens and New York by a group of prominent, like-minded world citizens, and aims to become a leading international organization in the field of e-democracy.

Our Mission

access2democracy aims to promote the principles and practice of participatory e-democracy within the global arena. Hence we aim to enhance democratic values and institutions and citizens’ access to decision-making processes.

Our Honorary Board

Maria Livanos-Cattaui: SG, International Chamber of Commerce

Lawrence Lessig: Prof of Law at Stanford Law School, Chair Creative Commons

Kumi Naidoo: SG & CEO of CIVICUS

Nicholas Negroponte: MIT Media Lab

George A. Papandreou: Leader of the Opposition, Greece - former MFA

Bill Richardson: Governor of New Mexico US, former U.S. Ambassador to U.N.

Amartya Sen: Nobel Laureate, Lamont Univ. Prof. Emeritus at Harvard

More about us at :

why edemocracy
What is the situation Today:

Citizens indifference, disengagement, mistrust - a strong feeling of being «left-out»:

Increasing abstention of citizens from the political process, giving away even their dominant democratic right: voting in elections /

CoE Green Paper: Projection 2020: abstention 65% in W.Europe

Democratic deficit even in “established” democracies

Governments need to find a way to engage the citizen


Increasing number of issues becoming of global nature and cannot be dealt with effectively at the level of National governments

Global governance institutions not adapted to their new role and are not accountable to citizens affected by their policies – Major ongoing Reforms

Why eDemocracy?

Global problems need Global solutions to

formulate Global policies and take Global action

why edemocracy4
The Role of eDemocracy:

Communication has always been a prerequisite for

Democracy, and ICTs can offer new modes of communication

collaboration and exchange across the globe

eDemocracy builds on the potential of ICTs to:

Promote the emergence of a participatory and deliberative

democracy that will bridge the gap between policy makers and

citizens providing the first with support and legitimacy and the

second with transparent access to information and participation to

the policy making processes be it at a local, national or global


Why eDemocracy?
what edemocracy is and what it is not
It is usually identified to websites with online forums, eVotes, eConsultations etc. But…

eDemocracy is more about democracy than technology

Promote active citizenship and participation in policy formation through Deliberation. Not just participation in elections every 4 or so years.

About the creation of a “culture of Democracy” where citizens will be participants and not passive recipients of policy.

Deploying ICTs is not enough

Like in every other sector (eBusiness, eGovernment etc), ICTs must be integrated through structural transformations to make any difference.

ICT ‘Layer’ over a bureaucratic administration  more bureaucratic

ICT ‘Layer’ in a badly managed company  bad Mgt. more prominent.

The multiplier effect of ICTs applies for eDemocracy as well

eDemocracy is not

Just about eVote or the creation of a “push button” democracy

“yet another” eGovernment service

A ready made solution to tackle the democratic deficit

What eDemocracy is … and what it is not!
online global poll on environment
Online Global Poll on Environment

At the occasion of the United Nations Summit on Sustainable Development (UN Earth Summit), September 2002

The First Online Global Poll on the Environment and Sustainable Development issues

  • The First ever large scale global eDemocracy project, under the auspices of a Global Governance Institution – the UN: 25000 participants

Aug.19 - Sept.13, 2002

lessons learned
Lessons Learned
  • The Digital Divide is a serious barrier to such initiatives
  • Not scientific but ‘indicative”: Results consistent with traditional polls

The People and Policy makers are ready to embrace such initiatives There is a real potential for Agenda setting in Global Issues Forums

from Citizens, through eDemocracy Platforms

  • Mandela – “This Online Global Poll is a breakthrough in beginning to measure and understand this global opinion about important issues. The world is indeed changing, and this bold idea will be an important part of this new world.”
  • Blair – “The digital age will give birth to new forms of democracy and this Online Global Poll is an important step in this new process.”
e vote vote for the eu you want
e-Vote: Vote for the EU YOU Want
  •  At the occasion of the Greek Presidency of the European Union in 2003 – Initiative of MFA
  • The most successful eDemocracy experiment to date : over 175000 participants
  • The first large scale eDemocracy experiment initiated by policy makers and linked to the decision making bodies
best practice
Best Practice
  • Awareness
  • Pan-European media partnership and civil society outreach programme
  • raise awareness /participation: 500+ EU and national NGOs, schools, Univ., trade associations, think tanks, political parties, interest groups, and local/regional/national governments contacted to drive public participation.

 e-Vote has attracted extensive media coverage around the world

  • Conceptualization
  • e-Vote: raised Crucial (even sensitive) political issues : The EU's Role in the World and Relations with US, The Lisbon Agenda, EU Enlargement, Environment, Immigration, EU Constitution - Future of the EU, Iraq Crisis etc.
  • e-Voice: views and questionsto EU leaders on the current and future EU
  • Participants could instantly compare ideas and opinions with all other e-voters
  • Political Commitment
  • e-Votes and e-Voices were incorporated directly in Greek Presidency activities reported to the council and were debated at the highest EU political level :
  • the European Summit
lessons learned13
It is possible through eDemocracy to enrich and reinvigorate democratic dialogue between Policy makers and Citizens, encouraging a greater sense citizenship making citizens feel better represented and closer to politics and institutions.

Crucial to the success of eDemocracy initiatives is: Political commitment and good outreach plan for maximum public involvement, as well as a sound technological/conceptual platform

Importance of tackling the digital divide, to include those without access to technology residing in rural or peripheral areas, as well as the disadvantaged people

Lessons Learned

The massive participation demonstrated that European citizens are eager to participate in the policy formation process and are willing to adopt eDemocracy

e dialogue
The first eDemocracy experiment initiated by a political

party in Greece launched At the occasion of Greek national elections: 03/2004

building on the “eVote” experience, it opens up party structure and

programme to all, through a full spectrum online dialogue,

Over 12000 participants

Inaugurates a new era in the way Greek political parties engage in

open and public political dialogue with the citizen


“Here, your voice counts”

lessons learned17
Parties, being the most important policy formulation institutions can lead the way in becoming the most important policy deliberation and dialogue Institutions.

The low level of partisanship and citizen disillusionment faced by many parties could be tackled by opening up a full spectrum dialogue with the citizen on the issues that concern him, engaging him in policy formulation.

 Citizens are willing to adopt eDemocracy platforms to become engaged in party politics and participate in a deliberative process.

Lessons Learned
e voices cyprus lets talk
The first eDemocracy experiment in Deep Rooted Conflict Areas

Bi-communal project funded by UNDP and USAID

Create neutral and effective channels of communication and promote reconciliation between the two communities through an open dialogue on vital issues of mutual interest to Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots

e-Voices Cyprus: Lets Talk
lessons learned20
 Legitimacy:Without political backing and active involvement of policy makers any eDemocracy project loses its potential impact towards greater citizen engagement.

 In deep rooted conflicts, citizens are not geared towards dialogue with the “other”. No eDemocracy platform alone is going to change that. It is a matter of offline reconciliation work backed by the policy makers and important “trusted” personalities and institutions.

 The social economic cultural and political environment are crucial to the acceptance of such initiatives

 Sources of funding might create suspicion and apriori rejection of the initiative by the citizens. (Given that 76% of Greek Cypriots voted against the UN-Annan Plan, a UN funded project was perceived as promoting the plan regardless of its real objectives)

Lessons Learned
a2d Projects

…in the pipeline

Deployment of ICTs for the Networking and Capacity Building of NGOs Active against Human Trafficking in the Balkan Area.
innovative aspects
NGO Capacity building through Collaborative Tools and Training:

Sharing and pooling of information and resources – HT infobase, Facilitate

transnational coordination of activities among NGOs, transfer of

international best practice and expertise to local NGOs through Expert

exchange online forums and training

Deliberation platforms

Inter-NGO : articulation of commonly agreed strategies and priorities

NGOs - Policy Makers - victims: set Policy priorities and coordinate action

Direct Linkage to Policy making

Views and priorities emerging from the deliberation, directly submitted to

National and EU Parliaments

 Creation of an easily adaptable Universal Platform for Civil Society Collaboration and Participation in the Policy formation process, Replicable to all issues and activity types, fully scalable to cover large networks expanding over large geographical areas.

 Project Planned : Create a European Network of NGOs & CSOs on Environment, linked to European Policy making Institutions

Innovative Aspects
e democracy experiments major lessons learned
►Legitimacy: eDemocracy must be backed by Government/Institutions and integrated in its policy making process to have any effect.

► Citizens are eager to participate in the policy formation process and are willing to adopt eDemocracy

► The adoption of ICTs to “enhance” democracy must be backed with increased accountability, transparency, security, privacy, democratic control mechanisms etc

► Adequate resources & access to expertise is paramount: Human, Financial, Technological

► The sole introduction of ICTs does not automatically make things better. eDemocracy is not a technological platform

► eDemocracy does not compete or substitute traditional institutions. It builds on them.

► eDemocracy can become the canvass of a democratic global governance, but only if accessible to all

E-Democracy experimentsMajor Lessons Learned
dangers of edemocracy
Badly implemented, eDemocracy, can be used as an excuse to enforce bad policy on the grounds of being inline with the “eVoices” of the people.

eDemocracy without accountability and transparent democratic control mechanisms can pose a real threat to privacy

Even though eDemocracy is in its infancy, malpractice has already shown up with “eDemocracy” sites “facilitating” citizen access to policy making, for money.

Citizens are already disillusioned with politics. Making fun of them through badly implemented and dishonest eDemocracy projects will make them completely disillusioned and eventually angry.

Dangers of eDemocracy
the way forward
eDemocracy should not be exclusively bonded with the PC and the Internet : necessary penetration of these to deliver real eDemocracy for all citizens, might never come(!) We have to keep looking at highest penetration mediums and potential future convergence of technologies.

eDemocracy is still in its Infancy : real experiments are crucial for the development of good practice early-on

Collaboration, exchange and pooling of Information and resources needed at a Global scale, to deliver transferable good practice and learn from others mistakes

The Way Forward
Tell me and I’ll forget

Show me and I’ll remember

Involve me and I’ll understand

(Old Chinese proverb)

Visit our site

Contact us: