Christianity as a foundation for science
Download
1 / 24

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 236 Views
  • Updated On :

Christianity as a Foundation for Science. Dr. Loren Haarsma Calvin College Christian Educators Association International Conference, July 25, 2003 http://www.calvin.edu/~lhaarsma/ChrsFoundationScieCEAIConf2003.pdf http://www.calvin.edu/~lhaarsma/ChrsFoundationScieCEAIConf2003.ppt.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - Gideon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Christianity as a foundation for science l.jpg

Christianity as a Foundationfor Science

Dr. Loren Haarsma

Calvin College

Christian Educators Association International Conference, July 25, 2003

http://www.calvin.edu/~lhaarsma/ChrsFoundationScieCEAIConf2003.pdf http://www.calvin.edu/~lhaarsma/ChrsFoundationScieCEAIConf2003.ppt


When we study the universe scientifically it increases our sense of beauty and awe l.jpg
When we study the universe scientifically, it increases our sense of beauty and awe.

Image Credit: NASA, ESA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)


Slide3 l.jpg
Conflicting voices tell us what the relationship between science and religion (in particular, Christianity) ought to be.

  • Fundamentally in conflict?

  • Separate realities that have nothing to do with each other?

  • Use science to prove claims of Christianity?

    Many students have uncritically absorbed some of these claims


As a result simply by teaching good science l.jpg
As a result, simply by teaching good science… science and religion

  • Many students will see the science as completely disconnected from their faith.

  • Others may perceive the science you teach as an attack on their faith.

  • Others may perceive the science as an attempt to promote a particular faith.


Slide5 l.jpg

One approach for dealing with the conflicting claims: science and religion Understand how one’s worldview(and, in particular, how the Christian worldview) can serve as a foundation for doing science and why science works.


Use science to prove claims of christianity l.jpg
Use science to prove claims of Christianity? science and religion

For this talk, set aside the problem of scientifically and theologically flawed attempts to “prove” Christianity using results of science.

Leave that for another talk, another conference….


Science and religion in conflict l.jpg
Science and religion in conflict? science and religion

P.W. Atkins, “The Limitless Power of Science” from Nature’s Imagination, ed. J. Cornwell, 1995, Oxford University Press

“Science and religion cannot be reconciled, and humanity should begin to appreciate the power of [science] and to beat off all attempts at compromise. Religion has failed, and its failures should be exposed. Science, with its currently successful pursuit of universal competence … should be acknowledged the king.”


Science and religion in conflict8 l.jpg
Science and religion in conflict? science and religion

  • Yes, there have been and are conflicts of ideas, but it is too simplistic to see these as conflicts between science and religion per se.

  • Scientific and religious ideas always have philosophical, cultural and historical contexts

  • Some apparent conflicts are due to faulty logic.


Apparent conflicts and faulty logic l.jpg
Apparent conflicts and faulty logic science and religion

requires or implies

a religion a scientific fact

Example:

  • Christianity requires the Earth to be fixed

  • Science proves the Earth moves

  • Therefore, Christianity is false

    Possible responses to the flawed conclusion:

  • Reject the scientific claim

  • Reject the arrow (the “requires” line of reasoning)


  • Christian framework for approaching apparent conflicts the two books metaphor nature scripture l.jpg
    Christian framework for approaching apparent conflicts: science and religion the “Two Books” metaphor: Nature & Scripture

    Belgic Confession Article 2:

    The Means by Which We Know God

    We know him by two means:

    First, by the creation, preservation, and government of the universe, since that universe is before our eyes like a beautiful book in which all creatures, great and small, are as letters to make us ponder the invisible things of God: his eternal power and his divinity…

    Second, he makes himself known to us more openly by his holy and divine Word, as much as we need in this life, for his glory and for the salvation of his own.


    The two books metaphor nature scripture l.jpg

    God science and religion

    Author of

    Author of

    Nature

    Necessary Agreement

    Scripture

    Human

    Interpretation

    Interpretation

    Human

    Theology, Philosophy & Hermeneutics

    Potential

    Conflict

    Science & Philosophy

    The “Two Books” metaphor: Nature & Scripture


    The two books metaphor nature scripture12 l.jpg

    God science and religion

    Nature

    Scripture

    Science

    Theology

    The “Two Books” metaphor: Nature & Scripture

    A tool for resolving apparent conflicts between science & theology

    • Hope:

      • Nature and Scripture are both from God and must agree (all truth is God’s truth)

    • Strategy:

      • don’t throw out one and keep the other (don’t ignore some of God’s revelation)

      • keep pursuing both science and theology until the underlying unity of Nature and Scripture becomes clear


    Science and religion in conflict13 l.jpg
    Science and religion in conflict? science and religion

    • While specific scientific claims (or philosophical claims motivated by science) might conflict with specific religious claims, there is no general conflict between science and religion.

    • Different religions might deal in different ways with specific conflicts.

    • The “Two Books” metaphor provides Christian framework for dealing with specific conflicts.


    Science and religion unrelated l.jpg
    Science and religion unrelated? science and religion

    Stephen Jay Gould, Natural History v.106, March, 1997

    “No such conflict [between science and religion] should exist because each subject has a legitimate magisterium, or domain of teaching authority…. The net of science covers the empirical universe: what is it made of (fact) and why does it work this way (theory). The net of religion extends over questions of moral meaning and value.”


    Science and religion unrelated15 l.jpg
    Science and religion unrelated? science and religion

    Nancey Murphy, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faithv.45, no. 1, p.33-34

    “There is what we might call methodological atheism, which is by definition common to all natural science. This is simply the principle that scientific explanations are to be in terms of natural (not supernatural) entities and processes.”


    Science and religion unrelated16 l.jpg
    Science and religion unrelated? science and religion

    Philosophical Naturalism: A worldview which claims that supernatural entities do not exist.

    Methodological Naturalism (or “methodological atheism”): A tool for conducting limited investigations and limited truths, which restricts itself to seeking explanations only in terms of natural (not supernatural) processes.

    Some scholars propose that science, by definition, is Methodologically Naturalistic


    Methodological naturalism is a misleading term l.jpg
    “Methodological Naturalism” is a misleading term science and religion

    • The term overly restricts what “science” is.

      Scientific scholarship, more broadly, includes:

    • Process of science (scientific method)

    • Discoveries of science (how nature works)

    • Basis for science (why science is possible)

    • Philosophical, ethical, religious inferences of science (meta-scientific questions)

    • Motives, ethics, goals of doing science

      One’s worldview strongly affects one’s approach to the latter three categories.


    Methodological naturalism is a misleading term18 l.jpg
    “Methodological Naturalism” is a misleading term science and religion

    (Psalm 104:19-21, NIV)

    The moon marks off the seasons

    and the sun knows when to go down.

    You bring darkness, it becomes night,

    and all the beasts of the forest prowl.

    The lions roar for their prey

    and seek their food from God.

    The sun rises and they steal away;

    they return and lie down in their dens.

    Note: the same events are described in terms of natural events and divine action.


    Methodological naturalism is a misleading term19 l.jpg
    “Methodological Naturalism” is a misleading term science and religion

    2) The term falsely implies God’s absence from “ordinary” events.

    The Biblical perspective is that God is just as much in charge of events which happen “naturally” as miracles.

    God is not absent from events which we can explain scientifically; rather, natural laws describe how God typically governs creation.


    Methodological naturalism is a misleading term20 l.jpg
    “Methodological Naturalism” is a misleading term science and religion

    3) The term falsely implies that science must necessarily deny the possibility of miracles

    The most that science can do is determine whether an event is scientifically “explainable” or “puzzling.”

    Theologically: A scientifically “puzzling” event is not necessarily evidence of a miracle, just as a scientifically “explainable” event is not evidence of God’s absence.


    Methodological naturalism is a misleading term21 l.jpg
    “Methodological Naturalism” is a misleading term science and religion

    4) The term falsely implies that science is more compatible with the worldview of Philo-sophical Naturalism than other worldviews.

    • To do science, you must make certain worldview assumptions.

    • These worldview assumptions cannot be deduced from science itself, but arise from culture and religion.

    • Worldviews which are very different can sometimes share a subset of assumptions which are a foundation for doing science


    Worldview assumptions necessary for science l.jpg
    Worldview assumptions necessary for science science and religion

    • Events in natural world typically have (immediate) natural causes.

    • Linear (not circular) view of time

    • These natural causes and effects have regular, repeatable, universal patterns.

    • We can, at least partly, understand these patterns

    • Logic and theory are not enough; experiments are needed.

    • Science is worth doing.


    Worldview assumptions christian necessary for science beliefs l.jpg

    Natural events have natural causes. science and religion

    Linear view of time

    Causes and effects have regular, universal patterns.

    We can understand these patterns.

    Experiments are needed.

    Science is worth doing.

    Creation is not pantheistic.

    Time is linear, not circular.

    God governs in ways consistent, not capricious.

    We are made in God’s image, suitable for this world.

    God’s creativity is free; we are limited and fallen.

    Nature is God’s creation; we are called to study it.

    Worldview assumptionsChristian necessary for sciencebeliefs


    Christianity as a foundation for science24 l.jpg
    Christianity as a foundation for science science and religion

    • A Christian does not have to pretend to be an atheist to do science (“methodological naturalism”). Science arises naturally from a Christian worldview.

    • Christianity is not a separate realm from science, but provides a fundamental foundation for how and why we do science.

    • A scientist does not have to be a Christian to do science, but must hold this subset of worldview assumptions.

    • Scientists of many religions can work side-by-side to study the properties, functioning, and history of the natural world.

    • Discussion about these meta-scientific assumptions at the foundation of science can open the door to “worldview” conversations, and can open student eyes to the role of “worldview” in their lives and education.


    ad