1 / 24

The use of low arousal approaches to manage challenging behaviours in individuals with ASD:A conceptual framework - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The use of low arousal approaches to manage challenging behaviours in individuals with ASD:A conceptual framework. Andrew McDonnell, PhD. Clinical psychologist, Studio3 training Systems, Email: [email protected] Autism is a heterogeneous construct.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The use of low arousal approaches to manage challenging behaviours in individuals with ASD:A conceptual framework' - Ava

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Theuse of low arousal approaches to manage challenging behaviours in individuals with ASD:A conceptual framework

Andrew McDonnell, PhD.

Clinical psychologist,

Studio3 training Systems,

Email: [email protected]

Autism is a heterogeneous construct l.jpg
Autism is a heterogeneous construct

  • It is important to stress the complexity of ASD.

  • There have been significant attempts to develop universal theories.

  • Too much research has focussed on falsifying various cognitive theories.

  • Some constructs may have an important mediating effects, especially, when considering challenging behaviours.

  • Arousal is not an unknown or new construct.

Arousal and autism l.jpg
Arousal and autism

  • Physiological hyper arousal has been associated by researchers with childhood autism (Hutt, Hutt, Lee and Ounsted, 1964).

  • Sensory overeactivity has been explained as a possible response to overarousal (Liss, et al. 2006).

  • It has also been suggested that repetitive movements may serve a dearousing function (Kinsbourne, 1980).

Sensory issues l.jpg
Sensory issues

  • There is an increasing body of literature which identifies sensory issues.

  • ‘people have different thresholds for noticing, responding to and becoming irritated with sensations; reflected in their mood, temperament and ways of organising their lives’ (Dunn, 2001, p609)

Sensory issues5 l.jpg
Sensory issues

  • In a survey of UK parents of 75 children with ASD 71% appeared to be hypersensitive to sound, touch smell and taste (Bromley, Hare, Davison & Emerson, (2001).

  • Individuals show abnormalities across multiple domains (Rogers, Hepburn, Wehner 2003; Baranek, David, Poe, Stone & Watson 2006).

Sensory environments l.jpg
Sensory Environments

  • There is limited information which claims better concentration is observed after multisensory sessions (Lindsay, Pitcaithly, Geelen, Buntin, Broxholme & Ashby, 1997).

  • A recent single case study of three adults with a diagnosis of ASD reported fewer prompts required in a preferred activity for 2 out of the three participants (Kaplan, Clopton, Kaplan, Messbauer & McPherson, 2006).

Sensory environments7 l.jpg
Sensory environments

  • The effects of multi-sensory environments appears to indicate that increased relaxation and reduced overt signs anxiety can be achieved (Stephenson, 2002; Lancioni, Cuvo & O’Reilly, 2002).

  • Reduction in the frequency of aggressive behaviour of two individuals with ASD and no effect on a third person has been reported (Kaplan, Clopton, Kaplan, Messbauer & McPherson, 2006).

Definition of low arousal approaches l.jpg
Definition of low arousal approaches

  • “A collection of behavior management strategies which focus on the avoidance of confrontation. This is primarily achieved by the reduction of triggers / cue behaviors which may arouse an individual who presents with challenging behaviours.’ McDonnell, Waters & Jones (2002)

Key elements l.jpg
Key Elements

  • Demand reduction in crisis situations.

  • Reduction in environmentally arousing stimuli.

  • Awareness of non verbal communication.

  • Diversionary tactics.

  • Challenging staff assumptions about the individuals control of their behaviour.

External environmental factors l.jpg
External (environmental) factors

  • Crowding.

  • Temperature.

  • Noise.

  • Use of stimulants (caffeine).

  • Staff/service users behaviour.

  • Level of exercise.

  • Visual design of environments

Internal factors l.jpg
Internal factors

  • Damasio and Maurer, (1978) produced a neurological model for childhood autism. They argued that areas of the temporal area and mesolimbic systems were implicated in autism.

  • Studies have also attempted to identify structural areas of the brain implicated in sensory differences particularly the limbic system involving the hippocampus and the amygdala (Lathe, 2006).

Internal factors12 l.jpg
Internal factors

  • There is laboratory research which demonstrates the relationship between an individuals levels of physiological arousal and performance in learning.

  • Studies of human performance have documented the relationship between behavioural performance and anxiety.

  • High levels of physiological arousal may impair cognitive processing in some individuals with ASD.

Maintaining equilibrium a central tenet l.jpg
Maintaining Equilibrium: A central tenet.

A balance between internal and external stimuli is required to maintain levels of arousal.

Equilibrium balance l.jpg

  • The human body has a sensitive self-monitoring and self-regulating system that is constantly working to maintain the body in homeostasis (balance).

  • I would suggest that physiological arousal employs a similar mechanism. A balance is struck between internal and external sources of arousal. Let us call it arousal homeostasis.

  • Each individual has an optimum performance threshold of arousal to functioning successfully.

  • We are aiming for a state of arousal equilibrium.

  • Regulation of arousal is problematic for some people with ASD.

Maintaining equilibrium l.jpg
Maintaining equilibrium

  • Stereotyped movements may help maintain equilibrium because they serve a de-arousing function.

  • Rituals may occur more frequently when arousal levels increase.

  • People avoid specific arousing stimuli.

  • Other do individuals seek out arousing stimuli.

Challenging behaviour and panic reactions l.jpg
Challenging behaviour and panic reactions

  • Many people with ASD and challenging behaviours show signs of panic in specific situations.

  • Behaviours may be interpreted as deliberate by carers in these situations

  • Similarities have been drawn between the symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and some individuals who present with challenging behaviours (Pitonyak, 2004).

  • Panic reactions can often lead to people needing to escape from situations.

  • Panic responses do not appear to habituate rapidly. This may be true of a specific subset of people with ASD.

Physical interventions l.jpg
Physical Interventions

  • Some individuals may try to avoid physical contact. These individuals are often hypersensitive to tactile stimuli.

  • Any physical contact can have the potential to cause major distress in these circumstances.

  • Some persons may even experience light touch as physically painful (See Grandin & Scariano, 2002).

Physical interventions18 l.jpg
Physical Interventions

  • I have worked with individuals who seek out forms of restraint such as spine and prone holds .

  • Temple Grandin described the calming effect of deep pressure contact for her.

  • Some individuals may be of increased risk of harm especially if they show low initial reactivity to painful stimuli.

High arousal approaches l.jpg
High arousal approaches?

  • Some individuals may show very low reactivity to environmental stimuli.

  • In these cases low arousal levels effect initiation and regulation of movement

  • ‘Catatonia’/ profound movement differences are relatively rare.

  • Clinically, some individuals appear to require increases in environmental arousal to help them ‘move’.

Measurement of arousal l.jpg
Measurement of arousal

  • Measuring physiological arousal can be difficult in people with ASD.

  • Cortisol levels (MacCreadie, 2007).

  • Variations in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

  • Heart rate monitoring in the presence of specific arousing sensory stimuli.

  • Habituation responses to specific stimuli.

  • Functional assessment of sensory processing modalities. Where ethically appropriate some limited behavioural testing should be adopted.

Conclusions l.jpg

  • Sensitivity to arousal as a model of working has several implications.

  • We are aiming to create ‘arousal equilibrium’ for individuals.

  • Assessment of individual arousal sensitivity should be a fundamental part of the approach.

  • Pharmacological approaches may need to concentrate more on reducing or in some cases increasing physiological arousal.

Conclusions22 l.jpg

  • Designing environments where arousal levels can be controlled (heat, light, colour, space, sounds).

  • Developing more self control distraction strategies (wearing walkmans, use of mood music).

  • Anxiety reduction strategies may help some individuals (see Attwood, 2006).

  • Consider individual arousal responses when developing individualised activity plans.

Conclusions23 l.jpg

  • The behaviour of staff has significant impact on the management of challenging behaviours.

  • Staff may inadvertently trigger challenging behaviours (McDonnell, 2005)

  • Training staff/families to recognise the initial signs of panic and sensitivity may have a significant effect.

  • Short term demand reduction should be a major facet of crisis management for people with ASD.

Presentation availability l.jpg
Presentation availability

  • For a copy of this presentation or further information please use the studio3 forum.