1 / 62

Welcome

Welcome. Yuma County Airport Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Aviation Industrial Center in DCC. Two Project Opportunities. Two Potential Leads C-5 Galaxy Refit Center T-50 Export Trainer/Attack Aircraft Plus a Warm-Up. Two Recent Requests from Lockheed.

ugo
Download Presentation

Welcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Welcome Yuma County Airport Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Aviation Industrial Center in DCC

  2. Two Project Opportunities Two Potential Leads C-5 Galaxy Refit Center T-50 Export Trainer/Attack Aircraft Plus a Warm-Up

  3. Two Recent Requests from Lockheed Aircraft Assembly Complex for the T-50 Aircraft Refit Complex for the C-5

  4. C-5 Complex: 150,000 Sq. Ft. Office

  5. C-5 Complex: 150,000 Sq. Ft. Warehouse

  6. C-5 Complex: 275,000 Sq. Ft. Aircraft Hangar C-5 A Galaxy Refit

  7. Other Request from Lockheed

  8. 175,000 Sq. Ft. Aircraft Assembly Bldg

  9. 15,000 Sq. Ft. Paint Barn

  10. 19,000 Sq. Ft. Engine Test Facility

  11. Fuel Farm

  12. Three Hangars of 23,000 Sq. Ft. Each

  13. First we Must Build an Aircraft Parking Apron

  14. FY 11 – DCC Apron Phase 2 $10.0 Million CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Jan Apr Feb May Mar Jun Apr Jul May Aug Jun Sep Jul Oct Aug Nov Sep Dec Oct Nov Dec Ready for Development Construction 12 Months Contract Award Grant Award Bid Open / Grant Application Budget Appropriation Earmark Action Meet Congressman Grijalva

  15. Other Available Development Space • Ready to Build • Next to CBP • Funded by Airport & Grant Funds

  16. Aviation Industrial Center • Must be a Multi-Tenant Facility due to funding restrictions

  17. Concept • Small Aviation Industrial Center

  18. Take the NASA Hangar x 2

  19. Take the Office and Shop off the Front

  20. Squish the Office to One Story

  21. Put Two Office/Shop Areas Together

  22. Put That Between the Two Hangars

  23. Two Hangars & Four Offices = Six Suite Nos. • Multi-tenant Facility • An Aviation Industrial Center Hangar Suite Offices & Shop Hangar Suite

  24. Dress it Up

  25. Add Parking, Plants and Social Areas

  26. View from Flightline Area Offices & Shop Hangar Suite Hangar Suite

  27. Aviation Industrial Center • Budget is $4M for construction – MAX!!! • NASA Hangar was $2M

  28. YCAA Consultant Selection Process FAA guidelines in Advisory Circular 150/5100-14d for Consultant Selection Title IX of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 requires that qualifications based selection procedures be used for the selection of firms to perform architectural and engineering services. The selection of consultants must be made on the basis of fair negotiations and equitable fees and through selection procedures that are professionally acceptable, ensure maximum open and free competition, and avoid any suggestion of unfair or unethical conduct.

  29. A/E Experience Team Experience Firm’s Reputation FAA Knowledge DoD Knowledge Workload Plan Delay History Yuma Awareness Insight to Problems Level of Interest FAA Criteria (AC 150/5100-14D)

  30. Our RFQ Package – 9 to 10 Pages • Cover Sheet • Team Member’s Background • Relevant Experience • Time Line • Technical Approach • Optional Information • Plus Illustrations

  31. Selection Panel Example • MCAS Engineer Division Chief (retired) • Airport Chief Financial Officer • Airport Director of Operations • GYEDC Airport Liaison Consultant • Others as Required • Airport Director (Advisor, non-voting)

  32. Scoring the Proposal • Eight of ten criteria are objective • You get points or you don’t • Scored by administrative staff • Two criteria are subjective • Selection Panel reads the narrative, looks at the entire proposal and makes a judgment. • Zero to ten points

  33. Barry Patterson Fischer Architects Nicklaus Engineering DWL Architects Terminal Modification - 4 Firms

  34. Armstrong Huitt Kirkham Morrison Nicklaus Wilcox Taxiway F, Y – 6 Firms

  35. Corgan Architecture Barry Patterson EMC2 Architects C&S Engineering TranSystems Engineering DWL Architects Concourse Expansion - 6 Firms

  36. Architecture West DWL Architecture Barry Patterson EMC2 Group Architects DCC Hangar – 4 Firms

  37. Dibble Engineering Armstrong Consultants Morrison-Maierle C&S Engineering Rolle Field – 4 Firms

  38. Nicklaus Armstrong Morrison-Maierle, Inc Huitt Zolar DCC Apron – 4 Firms

  39. Armstrong Consultants C&S Engineers, Inc Crawford, Murphy & Tilly Morrison-Maierle, Inc Ricondo & Associates, Inc The Louis Berger Group Master Plan – 6 Firms

  40. Parking Lot Reconfiguration • Direct Contract to CORE Engineering Services • Small contract, direct billing • Scope of work • Reconfigure parking lot • Restriping • Traffic Flow

  41. RFP for Design Build Project LoCoco Pilkington Yuma Valley Pilkington Commercial Construction Yuma Pilot Center

  42. Develop New Airport Emergency Plan • Kimley Horn • Direct Hire due to small nature of project (i.e. $15K to $20K) • Familiarity with FAA Emergency Plan guidelines

  43. Terminal Taxiway F & Y Concourse Expansion DCC Apron Rolle Taxiway, Apron DCC Hangar Master Plan Terminal Parking Yuma Pilot Center GA Apron New Emergency Plan Taxiway Z Airfield Lighting Fischer NEI DWL NEI Morrison Architecture West Ricondo CORE LoCoco Pilkington/NEI NEI Kimley-Horn TBD TBD Our Contract History

  44. Complaint from Community Why aren’t you using local firms?

  45. The Team – 6 potential members, 60 Points • Emphasis on Local A/E Talent – 30 Points Architect Civil Electrical Mechanical Structural Other?

  46. P O Relevant Experience • 10 possible references = 10 Possible Points • Points for each relevant project • One point for relevant project • Zero points for non-relevant projects • Objective: Find Capable Firm

  47. Relevant Projects (not all inclusive) Airport Non-Airport Retail Centers Strip Malls, Shopping Malls School Buildings Government Buildings • Hangars • Terminal Projects • Runways / Taxiways • Military Construction

  48. 3. Runway Rehab • Taxiway Rehab • Runway Resurface • Gas Station Drive • Aircraft Apron Name John Smith, P.E Project Role Civil Engineer Licensed Engineer In Arizona Yes Time Req for this Project: 15% Relevant Experience. Indicate which projects on Pg 4 this person participated in this role. Projects 1* 2* 3* 4* 5* 6* 7* 8* 9* 10* Team Members – 30 Points • Ten check boxes for each team member • Half point per relevant project worked on • Objective • Stop experienced firm assigning junior/inexperienced team. =2 Points

  49. Reputation • Ten possible points • We actually call your references • We ask specific questions about satisfaction, cost overruns (change orders) and project delays

  50. Knowledge of FAA policies, etc • Ten possible points • One point for each obvious FAA project on the relevant experience page • Objective: Our design work must be in full compliance with FAA Advisory Circulars • The Advisory Circulars are extremely detailed and over every aspect of engineering design on runways and taxiways • A firm that is NOT familiar with the AC’s will not meet FAA design requirements

More Related