1 / 12

Targets

Targets. Office of Secretary of Defense Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Office of Deputy Director for Land Warfare Target Systems Office - Dennis Mischel. November 1, 2005. NDIA Targets, Ranges and UAV’s. OVERVIEW. Changes within DOT&E Defense Science Board Recommendations

trose
Download Presentation

Targets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Targets Office of Secretary of Defense Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Office of Deputy Director for Land Warfare Target Systems Office - Dennis Mischel November 1, 2005 NDIA Targets, Ranges and UAV’s

  2. OVERVIEW • Changes within DOT&E • Defense Science Board Recommendations • DOT&E Additional Target Concerns • Target Management Initiative Investments

  3. DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION Mr. David W. Duma, (Acting) Naval & Netcentric Warfare C3I/IA Mr. Thomas Blann DOT&EOrganizational Changes Principal Deputy Director Mr. David W. Duma Administration, Business& Contracts Policy Management & Resources Science Advisor – Dr. Ernest Seglie Senior Military Assistant Administrative Assistant Information TechnologySupport USJFCOM Liaison Air Warfare JT&E/CCM Mr. Mike Crisp Live Fire T&E Missile Defense Mr. Larry Miller Land & Expeditionary Warfare IRAT/TETRA Mr. Steve Daly TMI Investments

  4. DTRMC Primary Functionsand DOT&E Investment Changes Defense Test Resource Management Center Dr. John Foulkes – Director Mr. Richard Lockhart – Deputy, Director • Strategic Planning • Develop & maintain • 10-year Strategic Plan • Prepare Report for • SecDef • Budget Certification • Review/oversee budgets & expenditures for MRTFB & all other T&E facilities • Certify budgets & report • to SECDEF • Joint Investment Programs • Administer CTEIP • Administer DoD T&E/S&T • MRTFB Policy & Oversight • DoDD 3200.11 • - Charging Policy • - MRTFB Composition Functions Transferring From DOT&E Legislated Functions

  5. Defense Science BoardRecommendations THE BIG THREE ISSUES: • Supersonic Anti-Ship Targets • Target Control • Full Scale Aerial Target STATUS(DOT&E Perspective)

  6. Supersonic Anti-Ship Targets • DSB Recommendation • Produce the GQM-163 A as the principal sea-skimming target. • Continue attempts at foreign acquisition of MA-31 for supersonic high-dive threat. Develop a backup strategy for domestic development and production of a high diver target. • Immediately initiate a limited production of a Threat-D surrogate. A ”skunk works” approach is recommended. • STATUS • In Production • Foreign Material Acquisitions are typically problematic. • FY06 DOTE/Navy High Diver Target Study. • Threat D is currently under concept exploration. • Separation Event • Acceleration/Velocity Profile • A “skunk works” approach is recommended: • DOT&E Focus for FY06/07.

  7. FY05/06 DOT&E/Tri-Service Mobile Ground Target initiatives may be provide a structure for long term solution. • Based upon an open systems architecture, standard message formats and protocols. • Control system study identified TTCS hardware as host platform • Hardware • PC Based • Portable • Open Architecture • Software • Mathlab/Simulink • TVARTS • Standard Formats & Protocols Target Control • DSB Recommendation • DoD Test Resource Management Center (DTRMC), working with the Services, should develop and ensure support of a plan for transition to a common target control system. • Service “Buy-In” is critical • Transition can be gradual • Goal: “shoot any target on any range” Status • DTRMC accepted tasking.

  8. Old Retired Military Aircraft • F-16 • Supersonic • Manned • 70’s Vintage • TMI Cost Study • Based on JSF • Supersonic • $2.7M + engine • <<$100M NRE • BAE/Scaled • New Design • Supersonic • Scaled Composites • $20/30M NRE • Unique Mission • Subsonic and Supersonic • Eclipse Aviation • $1.4 M Unit Cost • Subsonic • Manned • Aviation Technology • $2.8M Unit Cost • High Subsonic • Manned Full Scale Aerial Target • DSB Recommendations • Produce a drone using an existing aircraft platform (F-16 or foreign F-4) to satisfy mid-term needs. • Try to eliminate the man-rating requirement (ground transportable) • Begin concept demonstration of new advanced aerial target (unmanned to satisfy long-term needs. Is Business as Usual Acceptable? What are the requirements?

  9. DOT&E Additional Concerns O T P P O T T O P P Missile Ballistic Missile O T Full Scale "Supersonic" T Rotary O Aerial "Fighter size" P P Subscale T O Towed Aerial "Cruise/Utility" T O P Anti Radiation Missile P Fixed Department of Defense Target ProgramsDOT&E Assessment “DRAFT” O Ground T T O Mobile Seaborne P P Ground O T T O Submerged Scoring P P O Auxiliary T Target Systems Control T O Electronic Information P P Attack & Operations Asymmetric O T CM Targets T - Threat Realism P - Procurement O - Other Red – Critical Issue Yellow – Concern Green – No Significant Issue T O P P O T T O P

  10. TMI ProgramFY06 Investments • Developmental (Focused on Multi-Service Issues) • Surface Target Vector Scoring • Subscale Target, Common Control, Alternative Launch • Improvised Explosive Devise Test Target • Full Scale Aerial Target (?) • Studies and Analysis • FY07 Focus Areas • DSB Recommendations • Target Issues • Technology Insertions (Scoring, Control Systems, Materials, etc)

  11. Summary Significant improvements over the past year • GQM-163 is in production • BQM-167 is in production • AST Agreement • Standup of DTRMC Defense Science Board • Aerial Target Recommendations to AT&L OSD Target Investments • DTRMC/CTEIP • DOT&E/TMI DOT&E Target Concerns • Interoperability • Target Threat Realism • Presentation Cost (Unit cost, launch cost

More Related