1 / 25

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007. AGENDA. COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES. AGENDA. COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES. Controlling Costs – What’s New . Project size is up

trapper
Download Presentation

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007

  2. AGENDA • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES

  3. AGENDA • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES

  4. Controlling Costs – What’s New • Project size is up • Project duration is longer • Prices are (very) volatile • All the usual uncertainties still exist Escalation is “Suddenly” a Big Issue Result

  5. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Ideal World Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1

  6. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Ideal World Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Escalation Plan (No Escalation)

  7. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Ideal World Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Escalation Plan (No Escalation)

  8. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Ideal World Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Escalation Plan (No Escalation)

  9. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Ideal World Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Escalation Plan (No Escalation) 

  10. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Recent History Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Escalation Plan 4% P.A. 16 12 8 4

  11. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Recent History Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1

  12. App. Estimate Base Cost Estimate FEL 3 FEL 2 Controlling Costs – The Now Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 32 28 24 Escalation Plan Escalation Forecast 20 16 12 8 4

  13. Base Cost Estimate App. Estimate FEL 2 FEL 3 Controlling Costs – The Now Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1

  14. CONTROLLING COSTS – THE SOLUTION • Track prices from one estimate to the next • Track “As Spent” prices by individual commodity • Present estimate pricing changes separately • Look for price-driven execution plan changes • Don’t cut scope to pay for unavoidable price increases • Let the market dictate

  15. AGENDA • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE MARKET • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES

  16. THE IDEAL CAPITAL PROJECT 25 Years 6 Years Project Development 6 Years FEL 1,2,3 Phase Project Approval Detailed Engineering Phase Procurement Phase Construction Phase Project Operations 25 Years Operation Phase

  17. WHY IS THIS IDEAL? • Each Phase completes before the next phase starts • Each phase fully planned before it starts. • Follows project execution “Best Practices” _____________________________ • The duration for project development can be varied (elongated) to minimize capital cost Minimum Capital Cost (In Terms of Net Present Value) Result

  18. PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project) 25 Years 6 Years Cost $100 Million Project Development NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million Project Operations Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million Total Project NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million Total Project

  19. PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project) 25 Years 6 Years Cost $100 Million Project Development NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $55 Million Project Operations Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI = $56 Million Total Project NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million NPV (Project) = $1 Million Total Project

  20. PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project) 25 Years 6 Years Cost $100 Million Project Development 4 Years NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $55 Million NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $68 Million Project Operations Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million 25 Years NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI = $56 Million NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI) = $84 Million Total Project NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million NPV (Project) = $1 Million NPV (Project) = $114 Million Total Project

  21. THE PRACTICAL CAPITAL PROJECT 25 Years 4 Years Project Development 6 Years FEL 1,2,3 Phase Project Approval Detailed Engineering Phase Procurement Phase Construction Phase Project Operations 25 Years Operation Phase

  22. EXAMPLE OF THE “PRACTICALITY” • Compression of FEL activities • Applied to a $100 Million project • Applied to a $ Mega Project

  23. FEL EXECUTION “Best Practice” Define Process Facility #1 Define Process Facility #2 Define Process Facility #3 Define Process Facility #4 Define Utility & Offplot (Support) Facilities Prepare Project Execution Plan and Cost Estimate Best Practice FEL 3 Completion

  24. FEL EXECUTION “In Practice” Define Process Facility #1 Start Execution Define Process Facility #2 Define Process Facility #3 Define Process Facility #4 Define Utility & Offplots (Support) Facilities Prepare Project Execution Plan and Cost Estimate Best Practice Tempting Alternative FEL 3 Completion FEL 3 Completion

  25. MEETING SCHEDULES – THE SOLUTION • Accept that Project phases will “Overlap” • Plan for Intermediate Cost Estimates (Quarterly?) • Expect large cash outlays ahead of Project “Sanction” • Expect “Unorthodox” Project Execution to meet schedule requirements.

More Related