APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 25

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 74 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007. AGENDA. COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES. AGENDA. COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES. Controlling Costs – What’s New. Project size is up

Download Presentation

APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED ON MEGA PROJECTS Roger Mapp Bantrel Co. April 26, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED

ON MEGA PROJECTS

Roger Mapp

Bantrel Co.

April 26, 2007


AGENDA

  • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES

  • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES


AGENDA

  • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE TIMES

  • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES


Controlling Costs – What’s New

  • Project size is up

  • Project duration is longer

  • Prices are (very) volatile

  • All the usual uncertainties still exist

    Escalation is “Suddenly” a Big Issue

Result


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Ideal World

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Ideal World

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1

Escalation Plan

(No Escalation)


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Ideal World

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1

Escalation Plan

(No Escalation)


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Ideal World

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1

Escalation Plan

(No Escalation)


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Ideal World

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1

Escalation Plan

(No Escalation)


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Recent History

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Escalation Plan

4% P.A.

16

12

8

4


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Recent History

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1


App.

Estimate

Base

Cost

Estimate

FEL 3

FEL 2

Controlling Costs – The Now

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1

32

28

24

Escalation Plan

Escalation Forecast

20

16

12

8

4


Base

Cost

Estimate

App.

Estimate

FEL 2

FEL 3

Controlling Costs – The Now

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1


CONTROLLING COSTS – THE SOLUTION

  • Track prices from one estimate to the next

  • Track “As Spent” prices by individual commodity

  • Present estimate pricing changes separately

  • Look for price-driven execution plan changes

  • Don’t cut scope to pay for unavoidable price increases

  • Let the market dictate


AGENDA

  • COST CONTROL IN VOLATILE MARKET

  • MEETING PROJECT SCHEDULES


THE IDEAL CAPITAL PROJECT

25 Years

6 Years

Project

Development

6 Years

FEL 1,2,3 Phase

Project

Approval

Detailed

Engineering

Phase

Procurement Phase

Construction Phase

Project Operations

25 Years

Operation Phase


WHY IS THIS IDEAL?

  • Each Phase completes before the next phase starts

  • Each phase fully planned before it starts.

  • Follows project execution “Best Practices”

    _____________________________

  • The duration for project development can be varied (elongated) to minimize capital cost

Minimum

Capital

Cost

(In Terms of Net

Present Value)

Result


PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project)

25 Years

6 Years

Cost $100 Million

Project

Development

NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million

Project

Operations

Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million

NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million

Total Project

NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million

Total Project


PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project)

25 Years

6 Years

Cost $100 Million

Project

Development

NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million

NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $55 Million

Project

Operations

Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million

NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million

NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI = $56 Million

Total Project

NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million

NPV (Project) = $1 Million

Total Project


PROJECT ECONOMICS ($100 Million Project)

25 Years

6 Years

Cost $100 Million

Project

Development

4 Years

NPV (Cost - 0% ROI) = $100 Million

NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $55 Million

NPV (Cost – 25% ROI) = $68 Million

Project

Operations

Revenue =$70 Million Per Year x 25Years = $1,750 Million

25 Years

NPV (Revenue – 0% ROI) = $1,750 Million

NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI = $56 Million

NPV (Revenue – 25% ROI) = $84 Million

Total Project

NPV (Project) = $1,650 Million

NPV (Project) = $1 Million

NPV (Project) = $114 Million

Total Project


THE PRACTICAL CAPITAL PROJECT

25 Years

4 Years

Project

Development

6 Years

FEL 1,2,3 Phase

Project

Approval

Detailed

Engineering

Phase

Procurement Phase

Construction Phase

Project Operations

25 Years

Operation Phase


EXAMPLE OF THE “PRACTICALITY”

  • Compression of FEL activities

  • Applied to a $100 Million project

  • Applied to a $ Mega Project


FEL EXECUTION

“Best Practice”

Define Process Facility #1

Define Process Facility #2

Define Process Facility #3

Define Process Facility #4

Define Utility & Offplot (Support) Facilities

Prepare Project Execution Plan and Cost Estimate

Best

Practice

FEL 3

Completion


FEL EXECUTION

“In Practice”

Define Process Facility #1

Start Execution

Define Process Facility #2

Define Process Facility #3

Define Process Facility #4

Define Utility & Offplots (Support) Facilities

Prepare Project Execution Plan and Cost Estimate

Best

Practice

Tempting

Alternative

FEL 3

Completion

FEL 3

Completion


MEETING SCHEDULES – THE SOLUTION

  • Accept that Project phases will “Overlap”

  • Plan for Intermediate Cost Estimates (Quarterly?)

  • Expect large cash outlays ahead of Project “Sanction”

  • Expect “Unorthodox” Project Execution to meet schedule requirements.


  • Login