1 / 10

Cau River Basin Poverty and Environment Case Study Further Perspectives

Cau River Basin Poverty and Environment Case Study Further Perspectives. Presentation Overview. Challenges in the case study Strong points in the findings Next steps Shaping the recommendations. 1. Challenges in the Case Study. River Basin has 2 definitions (map)

tania
Download Presentation

Cau River Basin Poverty and Environment Case Study Further Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cau River Basin Poverty and Environment Case Study Further Perspectives

  2. Presentation Overview • Challenges in the case study • Strong points in the findings • Next steps • Shaping the recommendations

  3. 1. Challenges in the Case Study

  4. River Basin has 2 definitions (map) Administrative boundaries Physical boundaries (upstream) some important environmental issues are not well monitored in the statistical system, e.g. mining (figure) (downstream) Craft industry development takes place at village level but statistical data is only available at commune level Challenges of the case study

  5. 2. Strong Points in the Findings

  6. Detailed picture (and proof) of poverty contrasts between upstream and downstream; e.g. access to services Issues and opportunities in upstream are broader than forestry only Upstream & downstream have shared interest in environmental management Access to clean water Biodiversity and landscape management. Strong points in the findings

  7. 3. Need for further work

  8. Poverty-Environment at village Vs commune level, Upstream – villages from different ethnic groups Downstream – industrial and agricultural villages Mapping the linkages between poverty and environment Need for further work

  9. 4. Shaping the recommendations

  10. Balance between soft and hard investments Soft – environmental awareness, stakeholder coordination Hard – investments, e.g. engineering work Do not wait for further research (although this is needed) to target the villages with hard investments, e.g. clean water Design appropriate awareness messages that build on shared interests between upstream and downstream Shaping the recommendations

More Related