1 / 31

The Wisconsin Green Tier Program:

The Wisconsin Green Tier Program:. Developing An Evaluation Tool Analysis by: Darryn Beckstrom, Jessalyn Frost, Erin Rushmer, and Melody Sakazaki. Overview. Purpose of Project New Governance Model Green Tier Background and History Evaluation Criteria Recommendations. Purpose.

step
Download Presentation

The Wisconsin Green Tier Program:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Wisconsin Green Tier Program: Developing An Evaluation Tool Analysis by: Darryn Beckstrom, Jessalyn Frost, Erin Rushmer, and Melody Sakazaki

  2. Overview • Purpose of Project • New Governance Model • Green Tier Background and History • Evaluation Criteria • Recommendations

  3. Purpose • To develop a series of criteria to evaluate the Green Tier program, identify potential data sources, and construct a timeline for data collection Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  4. What is Green Tier? • Innovative environmental program • Encourages partnerships between Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Wisconsin businesses • Customized flexibility in exchange for a business’s commitment to superior environmental performance Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  5. New Governance • Main characteristics of New Governance are: Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  6. History: Pilot Program • Environmental Cooperative Pilot Program (ECCP) authorized in 1997 • Results: Six companies participated- all yielded exceptional environmental results - Example: WE Energies • Additional Benefits: Mentoring Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  7. Green Tier • Two Tiered System: Representing an increasing level of environmental performance • Tier 1 • Tier 2 • Charters Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  8. Evaluation Criteria • Process Criteria • Transparency • Stakeholder Participation • Outcomes Criteria • Participants Costs and Benefits • Environmental Results • Relationships Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  9. Process Criteria • Transparency Criterion: • level of stakeholder and WDNR access to information • Stakeholder Participation Criterion: • Extent to which stakeholders given opportunity to participate • throughout the Green Tier application and negotiation process Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  10. Transparency Criterion • Justification: • Facilitate trust-building relationship • Ensure open negotiations and agreements • Methodology: • Measured using a set of benchmarks Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  11. Stakeholder Participation Criterion • Justification: • New governance focus on citizen involvement • Broad participation  more representative program • Methodology: • Measured using a set of benchmarks Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  12. Outcomes Criteria • Participants Costs and Benefits Criteria • Environmental Results Criteria • Relationships Criteria Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  13. Participants Costs and Benefits • Transaction Costs Criterion: • Participation costs • (EMS) Costs and Benefits Criterion: • Costs and benefits of implementing and managing an EMS • Benefits Criterion: • Whether incentives created measurable benefits to/for businesses and the WDNR Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  14. Transaction Costs Criterion • Justification: • Essential to a traditional Cost-Benefit Analysis • Methodology: • Survey data • Case studies of participating businesses (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Charter) Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  15. Transaction Costs to BusinessesExample: MEGTEC Systems, Inc. (Tier 2) Estimated Transaction Costs: • Application Process Costs • Application: $1,000 • Negotiation: $1,300 • On-Going Costs • Compliance Audit: $1,200 • Interested Persons Group : Not yet implemented • Total: $3,500 Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  16. Transaction Costs to the WDNR • Application Process Costs: • Example: Reviewing Applications • On Going Costs: • Example: Recruiting Green Tier participants, Reviewing Reports, and Audits Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  17. EMS Costs and Benefits Criterion • Justification: • Participation cost but possible benefit • Costs of new policy instruments • Methodology: • Case studies (Tier 1, Tier 2, Charters) • Survey administered to WDNR personnel Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  18. EMS Costs and Benefits to BusinessesExample: MEGTEC Systems, Inc. (Tier 2) • Estimated EMS Costs: -Initial: $60,500 -On-Going: $ 9,850 -Total: $70,350 • Benefits: -Manage hazardous waste more efficiently -“Sleep Insurance” Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  19. EMS Costs and Benefits to the WDNR • Costs: • Example: Reviewing EMS reports and enforcement • Benefits: • Reduced monitoring • Example: Reduced inspection frequency Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  20. Benefits Criterion • Justification: • Regulatory efficiency incentives • New governance incentives • Methodology: • Survey businesses participating in Green Tier • Survey eligible businesses • Case studies Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  21. Environmental Results Criteria • Direct Environmental Indicators: • Achievement of environmental goals and broad environmental indicators • Learning and Innovation: • Effort to work with others in supply chain or industry to increase environmental performance Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  22. Direct Environmental Results Criterion • Justification: • Identify and recognize superior environmental performance • Maintain integrity of a Green Tier agreement • Methodology: • Data collection • goals and commitments listed in contract • broad environmental indicators Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  23. Learning and Innovation Criterion • Justification: • Shifting regulatory power from hierarchical agencies (Command and Control) to organizational networks (New Governance) • Methodology: • Case-studies • Interview representatives • Survey data Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  24. Relationships Criteria • Between WDNR and Business Community: • How Green Tier businesses perceive the WDNR before and after participating in the Green Tier program • Within WDNR: • The extent of the learning and trust taking place within the WDNR • Between Community and Green Tier Businesses: • The perceived effect of each business’s participation in Green Tier on their local community Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  25. WDNR and the Business Community Criterion • Justification: • Encourage participation of interested parties • Promote trust and cooperation • Methodology: • Survey businesses and local governments • Survey on Green Tier website Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  26. Within the WDNR Criterion • Justification: • Foster awareness • Increase knowledge and trust • Methodology: • Random survey of WDNR employees Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  27. Between the Community and Green Tier Businesses Criterion • Justification: • Promotes trust and confidence among stakeholders • Creates a forum for cooperative relationship • Methodology: • Focus groups Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  28. Recommendations • Form a Joint Executive-Legislative Working Group to Oversee the Evaluation: • Assess suitability of the criteria • Establish evaluation timeline • Identify funding • Set realistic expectations for success Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  29. Recommendations Continued • Provide an open evaluation process • Evaluate relationship between Legislature and WDNR • Measure learning and trust between Green Tier participating businesses and their employees • Increase public awareness of Green Tier Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  30. Relationships between the WDNR and the Business Community Criterion • Survey businesses eligible for Green Tier about possible incentives for participation. • Timeframe: about 2 months. • Costs Criteria and Learning and Innovation Criterion • Conduct case study interviews with Green Tier businesses. • Conduct interviews with WDNR personnel. • Survey participating Green Tier businesses. • Timeframe: about 2-3 months. • Data Analysis • Analyze data and complete final evaluation. • Timeframe: about 2-3 months. Relationships within the WDNR Criterion Survey WDNR employees about Green Tier. Timeframe: about 2 months. Month 1 Month 10-12 • Stakeholder Participation and Transparency Criteria • Collect information from the WDNR (this information should be available through the Green Tier application process) • Timeframe: about 1 month. • Direct Environmental Indicators Criterion • Collect environmental results data regarding each business and the state as a whole from the WDNR. • Timeframe: about 2-3 weeks. • Relationships between the Community and Green Tier businesses Criterion • Conduct focus group of community perceptions of Green Tier businesses. • Timeframe: about 1 month. • Data Compilation • Assemble all collected information and data for evaluation. • Timeframe: about 1 month. Evaluation Timeline __________________________________________________________ Background Process Criteria Outcomes Criteria Recommendations

  31. Questions?

More Related