Introduction to new theory of flight revealing the secret of flight
Download
1 / 85

INTRODUCTION TO NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT REVEALING THE SECRET OF FLIGHT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 177 Views
  • Uploaded on

INTRODUCTION TO NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT REVEALING THE SECRET OF FLIGHT. UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO FLY JOHAN HOFFMAN JOHAN JANSSON CLAES JOHNSON. WEB SITE: THE SECRET OF FLIGHT. http://secretofflight.wordpress.com/ MATHEMATICS FLUID MECHANICS COMPUTATION MEASUREMENT APPLICATIONS

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' INTRODUCTION TO NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT REVEALING THE SECRET OF FLIGHT' - paytah


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Introduction to new theory of flight revealing the secret of flight

INTRODUCTION TONEW THEORY OF FLIGHTREVEALINGTHE SECRET OF FLIGHT

UNDERSTANDING

WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO FLY

JOHAN HOFFMAN JOHAN JANSSON CLAES JOHNSON


Web site the secret of flight
WEB SITE: THE SECRET OF FLIGHT

http://secretofflight.wordpress.com/

  • MATHEMATICS

  • FLUID MECHANICS

  • COMPUTATION

  • MEASUREMENT

  • APPLICATIONS

  • HISTORY


New theory su bmitted to aiaa
NEW THEORY SUBMITTED TO AIAA

  • MAIN JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS

  • NOW UNDER SCRUTINY OF EXPERTS

  • FOLLOW THE REVIEW PROCESS ON WEB SITE

  • FIRST VERSION PRESENTED IN NORMAT 2009


Old theory
OLD THEORY

  • KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY 1904

  • FATHERS OF MODERN AERONAUTICS

  • PRANDTL 1904

  • FATHER OF MODERN FLUID MECHANICS

  • KZP THEORY


Scientific mathematical theories
SCIENTIFIC MATHEMATICAL THEORIES

FOR UNEDUCATED:

1. TRIVIAL AND CORRECT

2. TRIVIAL AND INCORRECT

FOR EDUCATED:

3. NON-TRIVIAL AND INCORRECT: OLD

4. NON-TRIVIAL AND CORRECT: NEW


New theory
NEW THEORY

  • PHYSICAL

  • MATHEMATICAL

  • CORRECT

  • DOES REVEAL THE SECRET

  • USEFUL


Old theory1
OLD THEORY

  • UNPHYSICAL

  • UNMATHEMATICAL

  • INCORRECT

  • DOES NOT REVEAL THE SECRET

  • DANGEROUS


What to explain lift drag l d 10 70 airbus l d 20 glider l d 70
WHAT TO EXPLAIN: LIFT / DRAG =L/D = 10 - 70AIRBUS L/D=20 GLIDER L/D=70


The secret l d 10 70
THE SECRET: L/D = 10 - 70

  • SURPRISING

  • INGENIOUS

  • ELEGANT

  • INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW

  • SLIGHTLY VISCOUS FLOW


Is theory needed
IS THEORY NEEDED?

  • BIRDS HAVE LEARNED TO FLY WITHOUT

  • THEORY OF FLIGHT

  • BUT IT TOOK 100 MILLION YEARS

  • FROM DINOSAUR TO ARCHAEOPETRYX

  • HUMANS HAVE LEARNED TO FLY WITHOUT

  • THEORY OF FLIGHT

  • BUT IT TOOK 500 YEARS

  • FROM DA VINCI TO SUCCESS: GOSSAMER CONDOR 1978

  • BECAUSE OF LACK OF THEORY!!



Gossamer condor 1978 first human powered flight
GOSSAMER CONDOR 1978FIRST HUMAN POWERED FLIGHT



New york times 2003 chang
NEW YORK TIMES 2003 (CHANG)

To those who fear flying, it is probably disconcerting that physicists and aeronautical engineers still passionately debate the fundamental issue underlying this endeavor:

WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR?


Nasa lists incorrect theories
NASA LISTS INCORRECT THEORIES

  • LONGER DISTANCE

  • SKIPPING STONE

  • VENTURI

  • BUT NO THEORY CLAIMED TO BE CORRECT!!

  • NASA DOES NOT SEEM TO KNOW WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR!!





Hoffren 2001 aiaa
HOFFREN 2001 AIAA

  • A SATISFACTORY THEORY OF LIFT IS STILL LACKING

  • THERE IS A GENUINE NEED FOR ONE


What keeps planes in the air
WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR?

  • INCORRECT THEORY OK AS LONG AS YOU DON’T USE IT

  • NOT USEFUL

  • NEW THEORY: CORRECT: USEFUL


Why correct theory only 2009
WHYCORRECT THEORY ONLY 2009?

  • COMPUTE TURBULENT SOLUTIONS OF

  • NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS + SLIP BC

  • DIRECT SIMULATION WITHOUT TURBULENCE MODELING

  • POSSIBLE WITH ~ 1 MILLION MESH POINTS

  • COMPUTATION TELLS THE TRUTH

  • STUDY REVEALS THE SECRET



Lift drag wing computable velocity pressure
LIFT DRAG WING COMPUTABLE VELOCITY PRESSURE


Pressure distribution c p upper lower surface
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION C_PUPPERLOWER SURFACE


Lift drag of wing computable max l 1 5 l d 50 aoa 16
LIFT DRAG OF WING COMPUTABLE MAX L = 1.5 L/D = 50 AOA = 16


To understand stability
TO UNDERSTAND: STABILITY

  • STABILITY - INSTABILITY OF FLUID MOTION

  • STABLE COMPUTABLE ASPECTS OF TURBULENT FLOW

  • LIFT DRAG MOMENTS..: COMPUTABLE

  • ALL YOU MAY WANT TO KNOW: COMPUTABLE



Stable attachment unstable separation opposing flow
STABLE ATTACHMENTUNSTABLE SEPARATION: OPPOSING FLOW



Short story theories of flight
SHORT STORY: THEORIES OF FLIGHT

  • NEWTON 17H MATH: IMPOSSIBLE: WRONG

  • D’ALEMBERT 18TH MATH: IMPOSSIBLE: WRONG

  • WRIGHT BROTHERS 1903 REAL EXP : POSSIBLE

  • KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY 1904 MATH: POSSIBLE: WRONG: OLD THEORY OF FLIGHT

  • HOFFMAN-JOHNSON 2009 MATH: POSSIBLE: RIGHT: NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT


New vs old theory
NEW VS OLD THEORY

  • NEW THEORY REVEALS THE SECRET OF FLIGHT

  • OLD THEORY HIDES THE SECRET OF FLIGHT

  • OLD: RULING PARADIGM

  • OLD: NOT FUNCTIONAL

  • NEW INCOMPATIBLE WITH OLD

  • SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION A LA KUHN


Lift and drag of long wing
LIFT AND DRAG OF LONG WING

  • SUCTION ON UPPER LEADING EDGE/SURFACE:

  • LIFT + NEGATIVE DRAG

  • PUSH ON LOWER LEADING EDGE/SURFACE:

  • LIFT + POSITIVE DRAG

  • FLOW SEPARATES AT TRAILING EDGE WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP: ELEGANT SEPARATION





Observation
OBSERVATION

LIFT

  • UPPER LEADING EDGE SUCTION

  • LOWER LEADING EDGE PUSH

    DRAG

  • LEADING EDGE PUSH/SUCTION

  • SEPARATION WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP

  • DOWNWASH


Recall c p upper lower
RECALL C_P UPPERLOWER







Understanding theory
UNDERSTANDING: THEORY

  • MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF PHYSICS

  • ASSUMPTIONS

    MATHEMATICAL MODEL = EQUATION:

  • NAVIER-STOKES + BC: GENERAL

  • LAPLACE + BC: SPECIAL

  • MATHEMATICAL THEORY: SOLVE EQUATION


Laplace eqn potential flow
LAPLACE EQN: POTENTIAL FLOW

  • INCOMPRESSIBLE: CORRECT FOR SUBSONIC FLIGHT

  • INVISCID - SMALL VISCOSITY: CORRECT

  • SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITION: SMALL SKIN FRICTION: CORRECT

  • IRROTATIONAL?? NO VORTICES

  • STATIONARY??

  • 2D??

  • V = GRADIENT OF HARMONIC FUNCTION

  • 2D FOR CYLINDER LONG WING

  • 1 + 2 + 3 VALID!! EVERYWHERE!! NAVIER-STOKES

  • 4 + 5 +6 VALID?? SOMEWHERE BUT NOT EVERYWHERE!! LAPLACE??


1 4 laplace s eqn potential harmonic function slip
1- 4 : LAPLACE’S EQN: POTENTIAL: HARMONIC FUNCTION + SLIP


Laplace vs navier stokes
LAPLACE VS NAVIER-STOKES

LAPLACE SIMPLIFIED VERSION OF NAVIER-STOKES

POTENTIAL SOLUTION:

  • 2D

  • STATIONARY

  • IRROTATIONAL

  • LAPLACE SOLUTIONS NOT TURBULENT

  • NAVIER-STOKES SOLUTIONS TURBULENT


Circ cylinder potential flow p 0 p 1 p 3 v 1 v 0 v 2
CIRC CYLINDER: POTENTIAL FLOW:P = 0 P = 1 P = - 3 V = 1 V = 0 V = 2


Potential flow bernoulli s law
POTENTIAL FLOW: BERNOULLI’S LAW

½ V2 + P = CONSTANT

  • HIGH PRESSURE P – LOW VELOCITY V

  • LOW PRESSURE P – HIGH VELOCITY V


Circ cylinder potential flow zero lift zero drag l d 3
CIRC CYLINDER: POTENTIAL FLOW:ZERO LIFT + ZERO DRAG(L/D = 3)





Potential flow
POTENTIAL FLOW

  • SEPARATION BEFORE TRAILING EDGE

  • HIGH PRESSURE AT SEPARATION REQUIRED TO BRING FLOW TO STAGNATION

  • NO DOWNWASH

  • MATHEMATICAL SOLUTION

  • BUT NOT OBSERVED IN REALITY

  • UNPHYSICAL!! WHY??


What s wrong with potential flow
WHAT’S WRONG WITH POTENTIAL FLOW??

D’ALEMBERT COULD NOT UNDERSTAND 1752


D alembert s paradox 1752
D’ALEMBERT’S PARADOX 1752

It seems to me that the theory (potential flow), developed in all possible rigor, gives, at least in several cases, a strictly vanishing resistance, a singular paradox which I leave to future Geometers to elucidate”.


What s wrong with potential flow1
WHAT’S WRONG WITH POTENTIAL FLOW??

EULER COULD NOT UNDERSTAND

???? 18TH

POTENTIAL FLOW SOLVES

EULER’S EQNS


What s wrong with potential flow2
WHAT’S WRONG WITH POTENTIAL FLOW??

LAPLACE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND

???? 19TH

POTENTIAL FLOW SOLVES

LAPLACE’S EQN


What s wrong with potential flow3
WHAT’S WRONG WITH POTENTIAL FLOW??

CAUCHY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND

???? 19TH

MASTER OF

HARMONIC FCNS


What s wrong with potential flow4
WHAT’S WRONG WITH POTENTIAL FLOW??

POISSON COULD NOT UNDERSTAND

??? 19TH

NOBODY COULD

UNDERSTAND



Kutta zhukovsky 1904
KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY 1904

  • SEPARATION AT TRAILING EDGE BY ADDING CIRCULATION

  • LIFT BUT NO DRAG





Ludwig prandtl 1904
LUDWIG PRANDTL 1904

  • SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITION IS WRONG

  • NO-SLIP IS RIGHT:

  • THIN BOUNDARY LAYER

  • DRAG BUT NO LIFT



Incorrect incorrect correct
INCORRECT + INCORRECT = CORRECT?

  • (-1) x (-1) = 1

  • NO!!

  • PRANDTL INCORRECT

  • KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY INCORRECT

  • WHAT IS THEN CORRECT?


Resolution of d alembert s paradox
RESOLUTION OF D’ALEMBERT’S PARADOX

  • JOHAN HOFFMAN AND CLAES JOHNSON

  • J MATHEMATICAL FLUID MECHANICS 2008

  • FINALLY AFTER 256 YEARS

  • SPIN-OFF: SECRET OF FLIGHT 2012


Potential flow stable attachment unstable separation opposing flow
POTENTIAL FLOW: STABLE ATTACHMENTUNSTABLE SEPARATION: OPPOSING FLOW



Trouble trailing edge
TROUBLE: TRAILING EDGE

  • POTENTIAL FLOW SEPARATION:

  • UNPHYSICAL UNSTABLE: OPPOSING FLOW

  • POTENTIAL FLOW ATTACHMENT:

  • PHYSICAL STABLE

  • NON-POTENTIAL FLOW SEPARATION??

  • 3D ROTATIONAL SEPARATION: PHYSICAL STABLE: AVOIDS OPPOSING FLOW


Circ cylinder potential flow p 0 p 1 p 3 v 1 v 0 v 2 zero lift drag
CIRC CYLINDER: POTENTIAL FLOW:P = 0 P = 1 P = - 3 V = 1 V = 0 V = 2 ZERO LIFT DRAG






3d separation at trailing edge
3D SEPARATION AT TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE

  • 3D ROTATIONAL SEPARATION:

  • WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE

  • WITHOUT PRESSURE DROP: WAKE

  • ELEGANT SEPARATION

  • PRESSURE RISE:

  • 2D IRROTATIONAL POTEN. FLOW SEPARATION

  • PRESSURE DROP: WAKE SEPARATION


The secret
THE SECRET PRESSURE

  • POTENTIAL FLOW:

  • BEFORE SEPARATION

  • NON-POTENTIAL AT SEPARATION:

  • 3D ROTATIONAL SLIP SEPARATION WITH POINT STAGNATION

  • 256 YEARS: 1752 - 2008 TO UNDERSTAND


From cylinder to airfoil rounded leading trailing edge underst cyl understand airfoil1
FROM CYLINDER TO AIRFOIL: ROUNDED LEADING + TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE UNDERST CYL = UNDERSTAND AIRFOIL



The secret1
THE SECRET PRESSURE

  • INCOMPRESSIBLE

  • SLIGHTLY VISCOUS FLOW

  • POTENTIAL FLOW BEFORE SEPARATION

  • 3D TRAILING EDGE SEPARATION WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP


Secret of flight
SECRET OF FLIGHT PRESSURE

  • HOW TO SEPARATE IN AN ELEGANT WAY:

  • WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP

  • ENGAGEMENT: EASY

  • DIVORCE: DIFFICULT

  • THE TRICK: ELEGANT DIVORCE


New theory new wing design humpback whale leading edge
NEW THEORY: NEW WING DESIGN PRESSURE HUMPBACK WHALE LEADING EDGE


New theory new design rounded trailing edge wind turbin blade
NEW THEORY: NEW DESIGN PRESSURE ROUNDED TRAILING EDGE WIND TURBIN BLADE


The secret of flight web site
THE SECRET OF FLIGHT WEB SITE PRESSURE

  • FULL STORY

  • MATHEMATICS

  • PHYSICS

  • COMPUTATION

  • APPLICATIONS: SAILING, SWIMMING,….

  • BACKGROUND

  • HISTORY INCORRECT THEORY…


ad