1 / 39

MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOLS Monitoring and Evaluation

MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOLS Monitoring and Evaluation. The National Democratic Institute. Introductions/ Ground rules. Introductions Ground Rules Ice Breaker Exercise. Photo: Sanja Gjenero, RGBstock.com. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Tools Objectives.

ortegar
Download Presentation

MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOLS Monitoring and Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOLSMonitoring and Evaluation The National Democratic Institute

  2. Introductions/Ground rules • Introductions • Ground Rules • Ice Breaker Exercise Photo: Sanja Gjenero, RGBstock.com

  3. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Tools Objectives • To become familiar with and practice using a range of M&E tools • To consider when and how the tools can be employed during the project life cycle

  4. M&E Tools Topics • What is M&E? • Gender analysis • Project lifecycle • Data collection • Program design tools • Evaluations • Other tools Image: www.pixabay.com

  5. Key Terms • Goal • Target • Baseline • Impact • Gender • Stakeholder • Indicator • Input • Output • Intermediate result • Outcome • Objective

  6. M&E Defined • Monitoring • Continuous • Ensures project on track • Identifies problems • Evaluation • Assesses whether project is achieving objectives • Periodic • Focuses on outcomes and impacts

  7. Gender and M&E • Gendered priorities, constraints and impact • Failure to address gender leads to inefficient and unsustainable results and exacerbates inequities

  8. Project life cycle

  9. Data collection Tools • Quantitative methods • Household surveys • Public opinion polls/surveys • Qualitative methods • In-depth interviews • Focus groups • Direct observation • Document review • Participatory assessments

  10. Exercise: Which tools? When? • Multi-workshop training program for women political activists • Objective: Improve the capacity of women to run for elected office • Which data collection tools? When? Photo: Amy Hamelin, NDI

  11. Example: Which tools? When? • Workshops • Pre-and post questionnaires • Evaluation forms • In between events • Direct observation • End of project • Focus groups • In-depth interviews • Election results Photo: Amy Hamelin, NDI

  12. Program design tools • Gender, context and stakeholder analysis • Problem and objective analysis • Activity plan • Indicators • Critical assumptions • Risk analysis and management • Resource plan • Results framework Image: www.pixabay.com

  13. Gender analysis • Can be undertaken at any stage but most effective if included in design • Systematic way of analyzing different roles and impacts • Asks the “who” questions • How this will affect women and men?

  14. Context analysis • Institutions or vehicles that have positive or negative impact? • Key actors or factors that help or hinder? • Socio-cultural, political and economic environment?

  15. Context analysis Example

  16. stakeholder analysis • All people who have a stake • Participants • Implementers • Decision-makers • Donors • Who are they? • What is their interest? Influence? Power? • Relations with other stakeholders

  17. stakeholder analysis High • Survey all people who have a stake INFLUENCE Low High Low POWER

  18. Exercise: stakeholder analysis • Program to enhance the capacity of the Liberian legislature to represent citizen’s interests • Identify stakeholders • Plot them on chart Photo: NDI

  19. problem analysis

  20. Exercise: problem Tree • Problem: Low level of women in elected bodies • Identify root causes • Identify effects • Link root causes to their effects Photo: www.pixabay.com

  21. objective analysis • Links problem analysis to program design • Provides visual map • Defines scope of program • Maps out pathway of change • Identifies what will be monitored and evaluated • Facilitates planning and management

  22. objective analysis • Core problem reframed as objective • Root causes reframed as intermediate results

  23. Indicators • Qualitative versus quantitative • SMART • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Time-bound • Negative effects reframed become indicators Photo: www.pixabay.com

  24. Critical assumptions • Factors outside our control • Conditions under which program logic will hold true • Conditions likely to affect achievement of results • Identify at each level of framework

  25. Risk analysis and management • Every program entails risk • Identify risks and contingency plans/mitigation measures for each level of framework Image: www.pixabay.com

  26. RESOURCE PLAN • What resources are needed for: • Staff time and materials for setting up an M&E system • Evaluation activities

  27. Results framework • Links evaluation strategy to problem analysis • Helps identify indicators • Aids in M&E • Clarifies logic of project • Provides roadmap for planning and management

  28. Example: framework

  29. Exercise: Results framework

  30. Program Evaluation • Types of evaluations: • Baseline • Mid-term • Final • Impact • Internal versus external

  31. Example: assessments Win with Women Political Party Assessment Tool

  32. Program Evaluation • Steps • Determine evaluability • Select research questions • Identify methods for data collection • Develop and test data collection instruments and protocols Photo: Sanja Gjenero, RGBstock.com

  33. Event Evaluations • Verbal feedback • Evaluation forms • Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires

  34. Public opinion research • Qualitative • Focus groups/in-depth interviews • Quantitative • Surveys/polls • Combination of both

  35. In-depth Interviews • Key informant/one-on-one interviews • Explore thoughts on deeper level • More flexible • Avoid influence of group dynamics Photo: NDI

  36. Focus groups • Why and how strongly people hold opinions • Can’t project results to wider population • Groups formed around common characteristics • Six to ten people and moderator • Open-ended questions

  37. Surveys • Identical set of close-ended questions • Representative sample of population • Results projected to larger population • Predict future behaviors and trends

  38. Example: Public opinion research in Ukraine • Nearly 50% thought women underrepresented • More likely to vote for party with outreach to women • Perceive women as better managers Photo: NDI

  39. M&E TOOLS REVIEW • Monitoring: continuous activity to ensure project is on track • Evaluation: assesses impact • M&E must address gender • Wide range of qualitative and quantitative data collection tools that can be used throughout project life cycle

More Related