The bottomless pit effect an analysis of tourism development funding in the orm ns g
Download
1 / 27

The “bottomless pit” effect – An analysis of tourism development funding in the Ormánság - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 73 Views
  • Uploaded on

The “bottomless pit” effect – An analysis of tourism development funding in the Ormánság. Csapó , J. – Marton , G. – Szabó , K . University of Pécs Faculty of Sciences Institute of Geography Department of Tourism. Introduction.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The “bottomless pit” effect – An analysis of tourism development funding in the Ormánság' - mills


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The bottomless pit effect an analysis of tourism development funding in the orm ns g

The “bottomless pit” effect – An analysis of tourism development funding in the Ormánság

Csapó, J. – Marton, G. – Szabó, K.

University of Pécs

Faculty of Sciences

Institute of Geography

Department of Tourism


Introduction
Introduction development funding in the

  • Analysethe tourism development supports and their regional impacts (2004-)

    • it is very important to receive grants and funding from the EU (or other sources) but it is also significant to measure how these sources were utilised and whether any changes were experienced from 2004 or not.

    • Our preconception is that hardly any positive processes can be experienced in the researched areaeither from social or from economic respect.

    • Our paper and conference lecture tries to prove or reject this concept of the Ormánság being a “bottomless pit”.


1 the orm ns g
1. The Ormánság development funding in the

  • An etnographicalregionattheHungarian-Croatianborderarea.

  • 63.000 hectares

  • 52 settlements

  • 19.000 inhabitants

  • Economicalpheriphery…

  • Demographicalstress…

  • Disadvantageouspositions…


2 the area of the orm ns g
2. The development funding in the area of the Ormánság

Source:Losonci, J. and Marton, G., 2008.


  • The development funding in the Ormánság is a landscape unit with numerous outstanding tourism endowments:

    • its natural environment involves several potential resources, which can be exploited by the tourism industry.

  • The territory is considered to be one of Hungary’s externalperipheries, therefore bears the characteristics of the social as well as the economic margin.

  • The volume of tourism – as an economic branch – is realised on a much lower level than that of the potentials derived from the resources.

  • One of the foundations of the region’s economic development is represented by the conscious improvement of tourism, which is based on the natural resources of the area.


3 the tourism potential
3. development funding in the The tourism potential

  • The basis is theenviromentalheritage

    • Inviolatevalues: waters, forest, animals…

    • National park, Ramsariareas, Natura 2000…

    • Activetourism !!!

  • Culturalheritage(onlycomplementary!)

    • Local gastronomy, buildings, religions…

      BUT, theterritory:

  • Withunutilisedsources!

  • Withoutinnovativeinvestment!

  • Withoutgeneraldevelopment!


Protected areas ramsari natura 2000 national park national ecological network
Protected development funding in the areas(Ramsari, Natura 2000, National Park, National Ecologicalnetwork)

http://gis.teir.hu/teirgis_termeszetvedelem/


The GE type tourism portfolio of the development funding in the Ormánság

Source: Marton, G. 2010.


4 the tourism supply
4. development funding in the The tourism supply

The spatial allocation of the accommodations

Source:Losonci, J. and Marton, G.


  • Accommodations development funding in the

    • Approximatelyat 15 settlements

    • Capacityaround 500 beds

Source: primaryresearch, Marton, G.


5 the tourism demand
5. development funding in the The tourism demand


Average development funding in the : 1465 tourist/year!!!


6 investments in tourism
6. development funding in the Investmentsintourism

  • Analysedplanningperiods:

    • SzéchenniPlan (2000-2002)

    • NDPI (2004-2006)

    • NDP II (New Hungary DevelopmentPlan) (2007-2010)

    • NSZP (New Széchenyi Plan) (2011-2013)

  • Supportsourcesfortourism:

    • Széchenyi Plan

    • ROP

    • AVOP (agricultural and ruraldevelopmentfund)

    • IPA

    • Leader


7 results
7. development funding in the Results

  • Verylow tendering acitivityatthe Ormánság

  • Hectictourismdemand

  • Increasecanonly be detectedattheprivateaccommodations

    • At a verylowlevel

    • Sothere is no correlationbetweentheimpacts of tourismsupports and theresults of commercialaccommodations

  • Lownumber of population – relativelyhighamountoftourismsupply – lowvaluesoftourismincomce and development

  • There is no breakthroughyet

    • duetothelack of uniform developmentconcept and notadequateproductdevelopment


  • Product development funding in the development is notdemandbased!

    • Top-bottomdevelopment

  • Culturalattractionsonlydonotmean an independenttourismattraction (eventhoughseveralsources, scientificpapersdeclarethis)

  • Sociallack of tourismcatering and hospitality

    • Local populationnotreadyfortourism

  • Lack of infrastructure and tourisminfrastructure

    • Whicharenottakenintoconsiderationatthedevelopments

  • „Ormánság” with a negative image

  • Total lack of marketing


  • Our development funding in the preconception that hardly any positive processes can be experienced in the researched area fromthepoint of viewoftourismsupports and theirimpacts has beenproved.

  • Still a „bottomless pit”…


  • Thank development funding in the youverymuchforyourkindattention!


    Sellyei micro region
    Sellyei development funding in the microregion


    Hazai t mogat sok 2004 2011 vben sellyei kist rs g
    Hazai támogatások 2004-2011 development funding in the évben (Sellyei kistérség)


    Uni s t mogat sok nft1 2004 2011 vben
    Uniós támogatások NFT1 2004-2011 évben development funding in the


    Uni s t mogat sok umft 2007 2011 vben
    Uniós támogatások UMFT 2007-2011 évben development funding in the

    https://www.teir.hu/rqdist/main?rq_app=um&rq_proc=eredfr2&xterkod=3204&xmutkod=18&xtabkell=I&xtertip=K



    ad