1 / 53

The “QUEST” for CMB Polarization

The “QUEST” for CMB Polarization. Walter K. Gear Cardiff University. Talk Structure. CMB Review Why Polarization ? The QUEST Experiment (Future Plans). Curtesy Wayne Hu htp:\background.uchicago.edu. CMB: Cosmic Rosetta Stone.

kuame-wong
Download Presentation

The “QUEST” for CMB Polarization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The “QUEST” for CMB Polarization Walter K. Gear Cardiff University

  2. Talk Structure • CMB Review • Why Polarization ? • The QUEST Experiment • (Future Plans)

  3. Curtesy Wayne Hu htp:\\background.uchicago.edu

  4. CMB: Cosmic Rosetta Stone... • CMB arises from last-scattering surface ~300,000 years after the Big Bang • This is the earliest direct image of the Universe we can ever obtain (EM anyway…) • The imprints of structure of the Universe today AND BigBang/inflation should also be imprinted there...

  5. Constraining Inflation • Accurate measurement of the CMB can constrain the nature of the inflationary potential • in particular the ratio of scalar to tensor fluctuation amplitude r=T/S • and the slope n of the assumed power-law spectrum P(k):

  6. Inflation predicts a mixture of scalar (pure density) and Tensor (gravity wave)fluctuations • The precise ratio is a function of the type of field which causes inflation • Scalar fluctuations couple to matter and provide the “seeds” for structure formation • Tensor perturbation causes a ‘background’ of gravity waves Scalars and Tensors

  7. CMB: The Golden age….

  8. Temperature power spectra

  9. CMB: The Golden Age …..

  10. CMB: The Golden Age ….. Flat, n=1; b = 0.021, c = 0.196, Ho = 47; b = 0.022, c = 0.132, Ho = 68,  = 2/3

  11. The MAP Temperature results…..

  12. “With temperature data alone, r of less than ~0.1 cannot be detected, no matter how accurate the measurement” (Kinney 1999 astroph/9806259) • With polarization data however we can break this degeneracy (amongst others) The anisotropy measurements have been a triumph, BUT ….

  13. The power of polarization… • Fundamental prediction of standard theory, if not detected at mK then there would be real problem • The extra information provided by polarization allows much better constraints on some vital cosmological parameters - 4 power spectra rather than 1. • Combination of P and DT improves some parameter constraints by factors 2-3 in most models • Break degeneracy between intrinsic fluctuation amplitude and re-ionization • Separate scalar and tensor modes in the initial fluctuation spectra, if B as well as E modes can be detected

  14. It is convenient to write this is as the sum of the gradient and curl of a scalar and vector field E and B [but has nothing to do with E and B EM fields !!] Temperature is a scalar but Polarization is a second-rank Tensor

  15. E and B modes • The scalar function E represents pure density fluctuations • The tensor function B represents metric fluctuations - gravity waves

  16. P = Q + U Polarisation of the CMB Temperature Q U • Generated by Thompson scattering off electrons in quadrupolar motion. + Polarisation Matrix:

  17. E E B B E/B Decomposition Cold Spot Hot Spot • Can decompose Q,U into: • E-modes (even-parity): • B-modes (odd-parity): • E-modes generated by scalar & tensor perturbations. • B-modes generated by tensors & grav. lensing.

  18. Pure E(left) & B(right)

  19. CMB polarisation spectra • Have 4 possible spectra:TT, TE, EE, BB. • TB = EB = 0by parity. Sachs-Wolfe Silk Damping Acoustic Oscillations Gravitational Lensing Reionisation Gravitational Waves

  20. 19/9/2002: DASI announces E-mode detection !!

  21. WMAP Results • Temp-Polzn Cross-Power spectra: (l+1)ClTE/2p High low-l modes. Adiabatic acausal perturbations. Line based on T-data only. (no free parameters.)

  22. CMB Polzn exists! What now? • Detection only so far, need to first map out the E-mode spectrum into the peak region& damping tail & properly measure reionization peak. • Measure B-mode contamination from lensing => mass clumping history from LSS to now => dark energy? • Eventually measure primordial B-modes=> constrain inflation

  23. How to measure polarization ? • Measuring such tiny signals inevitably involves differencing to minimize systematics and multiple levels of modulation • Broad bandwidths also generally required for sensitivity => Bolometers • Need careful foreground identification and subtraction => multi-frequency

  24. Planck Surveyor • Planck-HFI will conduct all-sky survey to 5’ in 2007-2009

  25. Why do it from the ground ? • Can in principle obtain much smaller angular scales than from satellite • Can concentrate on smaller pieces of sky than MAP or Planck and go deeper quicker • Can concentrate on range of multi-poles that offer largest predicted amplitude and best parameter discrimination • Differencing means both polzns go through same column of atmosphere - not so sensitive to atm noise as DT ground-based experiments • Can upgrade and repair instrument, more flexibility and (a lot!) less cost

  26. THE QUEST Project • There is a need for a deep (~mK), small area (10s to 100s sq. deg) polzn experiment which will report on a short timescale. • The Q and U E xtragalactic S ubmm T elescope project aims to fill this gap. • It is a joint UK/US project capitalising on expertise and heritage of SCUBA, SuZie, BOOMERANG and Herschel/Planck, amongst many.

  27. Q and UExtragalactic Submm Telescope QUEST Collaboration: Cardiff: W. Gear, P.Ade, L. Piccirillo- telescope, cryogenics, filters Stanford: Sarah Church - Focal plane & electronics JPL/Caltech: Jamie Bock & Andrew Lange - detectors + K. Ganga (JPL), A. Taylor (Edin) + associates

  28. Flexibility of QUEST • A real experiment has a sensitivity of: (Knox 1995) • T – sensitivity/pixel/Stokes parameter • pix – pixel size • Optimum

  29. Normally in a ground-based CMB experiment one has to chop to remove atmosphere. However there is always a residual uncancelled emission which often dominates the noise

  30. For a polarization experiment however we difference two polarizations which travel through the same column of atmosphere - no need to chop - and also makes dish simpler and cheaper

  31. Center (GHz) Lower edge (GHz) Upper edge (GHz) Bandwidth (%) Band 1 93 81 105 25.0 Band 2 147 128 165 25.0 Choice of Filter Bands • Motivated by science – avoid and remove foregrounds • Only two frequencies simplifies the design of the refracting reimaging optics

  32. Predicted sensitivities For 1mm PWV NETs :- 100 GHz~0.3 150 GHz~0.4mK

  33. Frequency (GHz) Number of Feeds Beam size (arcmin) 100 12 6 143 19 4 The QUEST Focal Plane Design • Each channel will use a PSB

  34. QUEST OPTICAL DESIGN • Wide-field (1.5 degrees), good optical quality (strehl >0.9), broadband (90-220 GHz) • On-axis and symmetric • Cold pupil-stop, small in order to fit waveplate

  35. QUEST OPTICAL DESIGN

  36. Lens 1 Lens 2 Sapphire achromatic waveplate Cold Optics Overview • The lenses and waveplate are cooled to 4K • All components have a broad-band anti-reflection coating • sapphire waveplate is located close to the cold stop • The cold stop is located at an image of the primary mirror

  37. QUEST TELESCOPE • QUEST telescope is 2.6m Cassegrain with foam-cone supporting secondary • Designed to rotate around 3 axes - Az, El and also centreline of primary (‘Z’) • Will point and track +/- 45 deg from Zenith with 0.3 arcmin rms • Because of novel optical design, cryostat is mounted through centre of primary

  38. QUEST Site and schedule • Officially begin operations in Chile spring 2004 • But …….

  39. QUEST on DASI • We have been approached by and are in detailed discussion with the DASI team • Which is likely to result to a late switch to the South Pole….

  40. QUEST Science Goals • To map CMB polarization on angular scales > 3 • Optimized to map E-modes, and B-modes produced by gravitational lensing and gravity waves the largest scales will be determined by scan strategy and the exact science goals Planned l-space coverage of QUEST Hu et al. 2002

  41. Survey Strategy • Two major surveys for separate goals • ~1000 sq. deg survey for detailed E-mode measurement (~6 months) • ~30 sq.deg survey for detailed B-mode measurement (~18 months) to detect lensing signal and possibly primordial gravity waves…..

  42. EE BB, GL BB, GW E-Modes • Maximum (S/N)EE ~100. • 1000 sq degs, 2000hrs.

  43. TE-Correlation • 1000 sq degs • Cross-correlate QUEST & WMAP. TT

  44. EE BB, GL BB, GW B-Modes • Maximum (S/N)BB > 5, detection of B-modes. • 2 x 30 sq degs, 2000hrs.

  45. Comparing QUEST with other experiments EE BB, GW

  46. Cosmological Parameter Forecasts • Fisher Information Matrix analysis of cosmological parameters. • Use a 7 parameter set: Wmh2 - Matter density Wbh2 - Baryon density h -Hubble parameter t - Reionisation optical depth ns-Scalar spectral index A - Scalar amplitude (~ s8) r - Ratio of scalar to tensors

  47. Cosmological Parameter Forecasts DWmh2 DWbh2 Dh Dt Dns DA DWbh2 Dh Dt Dns DA Dr 4 yr WMAP 2 yr QUEST + 4 yr WMAP

  48. Cosmological Parameter Forecasts • Factor 3 improvement in r. • Factor 2 improvement in ns. 4 yr WMAP 2 yrs QUEST + 4 yrs WMAP

More Related