1 / 7

Attachment: Individual Differences

Attachment: Individual Differences. Attachment is not an ‘all or nothing’ process There may be variations between children in the attachments they form. Ainsworth & Bell (1971). Controlled observation of children’s attachment behaviour using the ‘Strange Situation Classification’ (SSC):

kaipo
Download Presentation

Attachment: Individual Differences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Attachment: Individual Differences • Attachment is not an ‘all or nothing’ process • There may be variations between children in the attachments they form

  2. Ainsworth & Bell (1971) • Controlled observation of children’s attachment behaviour using the ‘Strange Situation Classification’ (SSC): • Mother leaves child in unfamiliar environment • Child is approached by stranger • Mother returns • Looks at separation protest, stranger anxiety and reunion behaviour

  3. Ainsworth & Bell (1971) • Three patterns of attachment: • Secure (70% of sample) • Insecure – avoidant (20%) • Insecure – resistant (10%) • Ainsworth suggested that attachment type was determined by primary carer’s (mother’s) behaviour www.psychlotron.org.uk

  4. Ainsworth & Bell (1971) • Secure attachment • Upset/subdued when mother left • Positive/happy when she returned • Avoidant of stranger but friendly when mother present • Associated with sensitive & responsive primary care www.psychlotron.org.uk

  5. Ainsworth & Bell (1971) • Insecure –avoidant • Unconcerned by mother’s absence • Unresponsive when she returned • Strongly avoidant of mother and stranger • Associated with unresponsive primary care www.psychlotron.org.uk

  6. Ainsworth & Bell (1971) • Insecure – resistant • Intensely distressed when mother left • Apparent fear of stranger • Clinginess mixed with rejection on return • Associated with inconsistent primary care www.psychlotron.org.uk

  7. Secure Avoidant Resistant Primary Carer’s Behaviour Towards Child Child’s ‘Working Model’ of Itself Positive & Loved Unloved & Rejected Angry & Confused www.psychlotron.org.uk

More Related