1 / 23

Ethical Considerations When Conducting Psychological Research

Ethical Considerations When Conducting Psychological Research. Quantitative Studies. * Informed consent Anonymity Confidentiality No potential harm Right to withdraw Briefing and debriefing For animal research, humane treatment and proper medical care. Qualitative Studies.

Download Presentation

Ethical Considerations When Conducting Psychological Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethical Considerations When Conducting Psychological Research

  2. Quantitative Studies * Informed consent • Anonymity • Confidentiality • No potential harm • Right to withdraw • Briefing and debriefing • For animal research, humane treatment and proper medical care

  3. Qualitative Studies * Informed consent • Anonymity • Confidentiality • Voluntary • No potential harm (for participant or researcher)

  4. Informed Consent • Purpose of study • Participants’ requirements • Right to withdrawal • Use of data • Contact information (for results)

  5. Ethical Considerations When Reporting the Results of Psychological Research

  6. What to Avoid • Data fabrication • Plagiarism • Failure to reflect contributions of every author • Withholding raw data

  7. Sharing Results With Participants Handle all sensitive information with care • Genetic research from twin adoptions or family studies • Identification of mental illness • Social implications of results

  8. Generalizing the Findings of a Study

  9. Generalizing refers to the extent that the findings of a study apply to similar situations or people outside the study

  10. Quantitative Studies Experiments • Most results cannot be generalized outside of the sample • Replication with different samples allows for more generalizations if the same results are obtained (observer triangulation) Surveys • Random samples allow for generalization to a target population

  11. Qualitative Studies Representational Generalizations Making generalizations outside the sample are possible with purposive samples Inferential Generalizations Making generalizations outside of the study conditions to other settings are increased through thick descriptions Theoretical GeneralizationsMaking generalizations to a broader theory are increased with data saturation and thick descriptions

  12. Ensuring the Credibility of a Study

  13. Credibility vs Validity To be credible, a study must be trustworthy and believable To be valid, a study must measure what it purports to measure The more credible and valid a study is, more generalizations can be made

  14. Quantitative Studies Experiments • Need to operationally measure (ie, anxiety) what it intends to measure (construct validity) • Need to be reasonably certain that changes in the IV caused the change in the DV (internal validity) • Since most experiments use opportunity sampling and artificial conditions, generalizing outside of the sample (population validity) or setting (ecological validity) is rare

  15. Quantitative Studies (cont) Surveys/Correlation Studies • Well-written questions increase credibility of results • Avoid questions which might trigger demandcharacteristics

  16. Threats to Internal Validity • Selection • History • Maturation • Testing Effect • Instrumentation • Regression to the Mean • Mortality • Demand Characteristics • Experimenter Bias

  17. Qualitative Studies To increase credibility, researchers should: • Use reflexive statements (reflexivity) • Use triangulation • Provide thick descriptions of the data

  18. Reflexivity Reflexivity means that a researcher is aware of how his/her personal biases and feelings affect data collection and analysis • Personal reflexivity- values, political beliefs, social identities etc • Epistemological reflexivity- basic assumptions about the nature of the world

  19. Triangulation Using a combination of different approaches to collecting and interpreting data • Data triangulation- collecting data from multiple sources (interviews, observations, documents etc) • Member triangulation- checking with participants for accurate interpretations • Researcher triangulation- combining interpretations of different researchers

  20. Thick Descriptions Describing the results in sufficient detail so that it can be understood holistically and in context. They are detailed descriptions telling the reader exactly what happened at the research site.

  21. Avoiding Bias

  22. Quantitative Studies Experiments • Use a double-blind experiment • Independent replications reduce concerns that results are biased Surveys/Correlation Studies • Avoid gender-biased questions • Reduce stereotyped answers

  23. Qualitative Studies Know that in qualitative research, bias is an integral part of the research because the researcher is a tool through which the data is collected so it can never be avoided- only reduced through: • Reflexivity • Thick descriptions • Data triangulation

More Related