1 / 31

Membership & Professional Standards Committee

Membership & Professional Standards Committee. Fall 2012. Bylaw Implementation Dates. September 1: OPTN Bylaws Rewrite – Appendices A-K and M (Phase 1 – Plain language) OPTN Bylaws, Appendix L, addressing reviews, actions, and due process (substantive and plain language changes).

howard
Download Presentation

Membership & Professional Standards Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Membership & Professional Standards Committee Fall 2012

  2. Bylaw Implementation Dates September 1: • OPTN Bylaws Rewrite – Appendices A-K and M (Phase 1 – Plain language) • OPTN Bylaws, Appendix L, addressing reviews, actions, and due process (substantive and plain language changes)

  3. Ongoing Committee Initiatives • Modified Outcomes Flagging Methodology • Goal: Better identify transplant programs that could truly benefit from intervention • Outcomes data using existing and new methodology studied in parallel for several CSR cycles and reviewed by MPSC • Modified flagging methodology will be recommended by the MPSC as the sole flagging method • Proposal will be distributed for public comment during Spring 2013

  4. New Committee Initiatives • Bylaws Rewrite – Phase 2 • Procedures for reviewing applications • Process for submitting letters of reference • Primary surgeon/physician currency requirements • Clarification of reporting requirements for changes in key personnel at OPO’s and Histo Labs • Intestinal Transplant Program Requirements (led by Liver/Intestine Committee)

  5. Questions? • Ken Andreoni MD, Committee Chair Kenneth.Andreoni@surgery.ufl.edu • Alan Reed, MD, Vice Chair alan-reed@uiowa.edu • Sally Aungier, MPSC Liaison Sally.aungier@unos.org

  6. Proposal to Remove the OPTN Bylaw for the Combined Heart-Lung Transplant Program Designation Co-Sponsors: MPSC and Thoracic Committees Fall 2012 Public Comment Cycle

  7. The Problems • Only combined transplant that requires separate program approval status • Inconsistent with other combined organ transplants • Computer system development and programming challenges

  8. Goals • Align program requirements for all combined organ transplants • Reduce application burden • Simplify • Make more efficient

  9. Achieving These Goals Remove bylaw = problems solved

  10. Impact Programs • 50 heart/lung programs • Potential for 125 more Patients • 54 heart/lung transplant candidates • Candidates not affected

  11. Expected Implementation • Anticipated Board Consideration: June 2013 • Anticipated Effective Date: September 1, 2013

  12. Member Action None!

  13. NOT Controversial Feedback • Very few objections • “makes sense”

  14. Contacts Thoracic Chair: Steven A. Webber, MD Thoracic Vice Chair: Joe Rogers, MD Staff Liaison Liz Robbins 804-782-4068 Elizabeth.Robbins@unos.org

  15. Contacts MPSC Chair: Kenneth Andreoni, MD MPSC Vice Chair: Alan Reed, MD Staff Liaison Sally Aungier 804-782-4812 sally.aungier@unos.org

  16. Proposal to Change the OPTN/UNOS Bylaws to Better Define Notification Requirements for Periods of Functional Inactivity Membership and Professional Standards Committee Fall 2012

  17. The Problem • Bylaws do not clearly outline Member actions for functional inactivity, including: • Periods of waiting list inactivation • Cessation of a transplant program component (e.g. Living Donor/adult-peds) • Since the Bylaws do not specifically address notification content or timing, programs have been inconsistent in how they notify patients

  18. Goal of the Proposal • Detailed, timely patient information regarding periods when organ offers will not be made on their behalf • More guidance for MPSC to monitor functional inactivity

  19. Goal of the Proposal (cont.) • Clearly define Member responsibilities: • Clarify patient notification content and timing requirements for periods of waiting list inactivation in UNetsm • Specify Member actions for notifying patients when a program voluntarily ceases performing a specific type of transplant

  20. How the Proposal will Achieve its Goal WL Inactivation • Current bylaw requires programs to provide written notice to potential candidates and candidates of waiting list inactivity • Proposed modifications: waiting list inactivity notifications must contain the following: • Reason • Expected length • Explanation organs cannot be accepted during this time

  21. How the Proposal will Achieve its Goal WL Inactivation II • Notification content requirements (cont): • Options available to the candidates, including multiple listing/transfer • Mechanism for notifying candidates when WL is reactivated or if the expected length of inactivation is extended • Copy of Patient Information Letter • Cumulative notice must include dates for each instance of WL inactivation

  22. How the Proposal will Achieve its Goal WL Inactivation III • When to send notifications:

  23. How the Proposal will Achieve its Goal WL Inactivation IV • Example: Program reaching cumulative waiting list inactivation of 28 days or more in one 365 day Period

  24. How the Proposal will Achieve its GoalProgram Component Cessation • Members must: • Notify all patients affected by the cessation at least 30 days prior to, but no later than 7 days after cessation

  25. How the Proposal will Achieve its GoalProgram Component Cessation (cont.) • Patient notifications must include: • Reason for cessation • Explanation that organs cannot be accepted on the candidate’s behalf during period of cessation • Patient options • Phone number for the transplant program’s administrative office

  26. Impact • 12 programs met WL inactivation thresholds in 2011 • 4 programs ceased a component in 2011 • Proposed requirements could result in additional financial burden to send notifications, increase in patient calls/questions, submission of responses to MPSC inquiries

  27. Expected Implementation • Anticipated Date of Board Consideration: June 2013 • Anticipated Effective Date: September 1, 2013

  28. What Members Will Need to Do • WL inactivation: • Include required elements in patient notifications • Send within specified timeframe • Cessation: • Include all required elements • Send within specified timeframes • MPSC will continue to monitor periods of WL inactivation and will request confirmation that you notified patients

  29. Specific Requests for Comment • Questions refer to Appendix K, section A (program component cessation bylaw), page 94 in the public comment document • Is the term ‘affected patients’ clear enough? Proposed language includes these groups: • Potential Candidates • Waitlisted Candidates • Potential Living Donors

  30. Questions? MPSC Chair: Kenneth Andreoni, MD MPSC Vice Chair: Alan Reed, MD Staff Liaisons Jacqui O’Keefe 804-782-4867 jacqueline.okeefe@unos.org Sally Aungier 804-782-4812 sally.aungier@unos.org

More Related