Isolating physical per for smart rate selection in 802 11
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

Isolating Physical PER for Smart Rate Selection in 802.11 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 36 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Isolating Physical PER for Smart Rate Selection in 802.11. Malik Ahmad Yar Khan and Darryl Veitch ARC Special Centre for Ultra-Broadband Information Networks (CUBIN) The University of Melbourne, Australia IEEE Infocom 2009 (acceptance rate = 19.65%). Outline. Introduction The core idea

Download Presentation

Isolating Physical PER for Smart Rate Selection in 802.11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Isolating physical per for smart rate selection in 802 11

Isolating Physical PER for Smart Rate Selection in 802.11

Malik Ahmad Yar Khan and Darryl VeitchARC Special Centre for Ultra-Broadband Information Networks (CUBIN)The University of Melbourne, AustraliaIEEE Infocom 2009(acceptance rate = 19.65%)


Outline

Outline

  • Introduction

  • The core idea

  • RCA modification

    • Fragmentation implementation

    • RTS/CTS implementation

  • Performance

  • Conclusion


Introduction

Introduction

  • Rate selection algorithms in use in 802.11 suffer from a fundamental problem

    • Implicity or explicity make decisions bases on total Packet Error Rate (PER)

  • False rate decision lowers the system throughput


Introduction1

Introduction

  • Total PER = PPER + CPER

    • PPER: Physical PER

    • CPER: contention PER

  • It is often the case CPER dominates PPER

    • Poor latency, loss and throughput


Per under a ideal environment

PER under a ideal environment


Goal of the paper

Goal of the paper

  • Providing a novel way to isolate the physical error

  • Providing a modular way of isolating the contention error which any rate adaptation algorithm can be enhanced


Fragmentation

Fragmentation

  • Only consider a packet is fragmented into 2 frames

  • The fragment 2 is sent out only after an SIFS after the final ACK

    • Provided there are no hidden terminals


Fragmentation1

Fragmentation

  • If the first fragment is lost, for nay reason, the second will not even be sent

  • Observation: the loss of a second fragment on the first transmission attempt

    • Physical error


Rts cts

RTS/CTS

  • Once the RTS-CTS exchange is completed, the data packet will have the channel reserved, and will only encounter error for physical reasons


Block reservation in 802 11e

Block reservation in 802.11e

  • An option in IEEE 802.11e

  • The second data packet of such blocks could be used to directly measure PPER


Main concept

Main concept

  • Not to use these methods all the time in practice

  • Only trigger their use often enough to gather good statistics on PPER


Scatterplots of per with no cross traffic

Scatterplots of PER with no cross traffic


Scatterplots of per with ct and fragmentation

Scatterplots of PER with CT and fragmentation


Scatterplots of per with ct and fragmentation rts cts on

Scatterplots of PER with CT and fragmentation (RTS/CTS on)


Rate dependence of ip throughput

Rate dependence of IP throughput


Fragmentation implementation

Fragmentation implementation

  • Only descriptors of second fragments are passed to the RCAs

  • A mechanism is needed to trigger the fragmentation of selected packets

    • Maintains a simple ON/OFF variable


Rts cts implementation

RTS/CTS implementation

  • RTS/CTS protection is switched on by a per-packet decision

  • Use Long Retry Count (LRC) to record the statistic of RTS/CST transmission


Performance

Performance

  • Two main metrics

    • Weighted mean rate summaries

    • IP throughput

  • All experiments are run in IEEE 802.11a in testbed

    • Full rate set:{6,9,12,18,24,36,48,54}

    • Packet size: 1500 bytes

    • 10 stations if no further explanation


The wireless testbed

The wireless testbed

  • St[1-13] are stations, Sniff[1-2] are sniffers


Two implementation protocols

Two implementation protocols

  • SampleRate

    • A MIT master thesis

    • Implemented on MadWifi

  • AMRR

    • A multi-rate algorithm also implemented on MadWifi


Single user with different rcas

Single user with different RCAs


Tper for single user case for amrr

TPER for single user case for AMRR


Samplerate with different packet sizes 1472b

SampleRate with different packet sizes (1472B)


Samplerate with different packet sizes 716b

SampleRate with different packet sizes (716B)


Udp upstream system throughput

UDP upstream system throughput


Tcp upstream system throughput

TCP upstream system throughput


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • The paper investigates two ways to isolate Physical PER

    • RTS/CTS

    • MAC level packet fragmentation

  • Higher channel rates were used when PPER was in fact low, even when contention is present


Thank you

Thank you!!


  • Login