slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Reimplementation: Changing the Way We Do Business

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 45

Reimplementation: Changing the Way We Do Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on

Reimplementation: Changing the Way We Do Business. David Petzel IT Director A.J. Antunes. The Promise in Our Abstract : We promised to tell you how the QAD + Eagle Solution made A.J. Antunes a data-driven company. Keeping the Promise: 3 Questions. About A.J. Antunes & Co.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Reimplementation: Changing the Way We Do Business' - ashlyn


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Reimplementation:Changing the Way We Do Business

  • David PetzelIT DirectorA.J. Antunes
slide2

The Promise in

Our Abstract :

We promised to tell you how the QAD + Eagle Solution made A.J. Antunes a data-driven company.

slide4

About A.J. Antunes & Co.

  • Manufacturing company based in Carol Stream, IL
  • Facility in Suzhou, China
  • Product Lines:

Roundup Food Vizion Water Custom

Service Equipment Filtration Controls

slide5

About A.J. Antunes & QAD

  • QAD customer since 1996
  • May 2009 - Upgrade from eB 2.1 to QAD 2008SE with .Net 2.6.1
  • March 2010 - .Net Upgrade from .Net 2.7.1 to .Net 2.8.1
  • QAD Modules in use at AJA:
    • Using most of the standard QAD modules
    • QPS
    • CSS
    • DRP
why a reimplementation of qad
Why a “Reimplementation” of QAD?
  • May, 2008 - AJA CEO questioned the current QAD implementation:
    • Why is it so hard to gather good data?
    • Need more than historical reporting at our fingertips
    • CEOs from other companies brag about their systems
  • June, 2008 - Contracted Liberty Technology Advisors to evaluate AJA’s current ERP implementation
  • August, 2008 – LTA recommended that AJA:
    • Re-engineer all business processes
    • Upgrade QAD to 2008SE and the .Net UI
      • QAD is right for our business
      • .Net UI brings a whole new level of functionality
      • Bad News/Good News………….14 years of experience using QAD
aja process re engineering
AJA Process Re-engineering
  • 4 months (Nov 15 to March 15)
  • 25 to 35 hours per week
  • Key decision to use Liberty Technology Advisors (LTA) for all process mapping
    • RCM Technologies to provide expertise to blend our future state process maps with the functionality available in QAD2008SE & .Net UI
  • China Team brought in to participate in process mapping on key intercompany processes
slide12

Why Eagle: Technical Considerations

  • Seamless plug-and-play integration with QAD
  • Online, real-time, Progress-based
  • No side databases, separate server or middleware
  • Calls QAD edit and update routines to provide real-time data checking
  • Supports a wide array of devices, including Intermec CK3 RF terminals
  • ALL Eagle installations are also QAD installations
  • Not a canned solution; over 2,000 configurable RFvalues
slide13

Why Eagle: Cost Considerations

  • Less hardware and software are required because RF Express™ for QAD Enterprise Applications uses the existing database and existing server
  • Reduced database/server ongoing maintenance
  • Simplified database control: QAD and Eagle work together
slide15

3.2 - Inventory Detail by Item Browse

Used to monitor “SO” locations (daily)

slide22

Example of a browse

“behind the metric”

slide24

Success Story #1 – Advanced Repetitive

Problem: Repetitive work cell activity is not transacted in real-time, causing material issues and handwritten “hot” sheets.

Goal: Use the future state Process Map to eliminate time delays and to empower Line Leaders to effectively manage their cells.

slide25

Success Story #1 – Advanced Repetitive

How we did it:

  • Process Change: Add Operations to Routings to improve work cell visibility:
    • Assembly (90% of BOM is backflushed here)
    • Testing (up to 24 hours)
    • Packaging
    • Staging (after completion)
  • Process Change: Specify timing and parameters for Repetitive Picklists so that material for tomorrow’s production shows up before 1st shift begins
  • Technology:
    • Eagle backflush transactions (handheld & PC’s)
    • Eagle label printing (on wireless printers) so that all material would be identified with a Part Number/Bar Code
    • Production Line Schedule Browse (custom browse)
      • Empowers Line Leaders to prioritize daily production
      • Paperless interaction w/Scheduling
      • Auto Refresh  “Live” browse for anyone viewing it
slide27

Success Story #1 – Advanced Repetitive

Result:

  • Line Leaders rely on QAD browses
  • With timely backflushing, all Team Members rely on Inventory accuracy within the Work Cells
  • Handwritten sheets are gone
  • Product identification is not an issue any more
  • Line Leaders are quick to identify BOM issues
  • Expedited orders are handled very easily without the burdensome paperwork
  • Line Leaders are expected to be proactive for maintaining their Work Cell inventory
slide28

Success Story #2 – Service Parts

Problem: Service Agencies supporting key accounts are complaining about late deliveries and shipping errors

Goal: Improve on-time and overall Shipping performance in the Service Parts Division

slide29

Success Story #2 – Service Parts

Overview of Service Parts:

  • Replacement component parts
  • Kits that are assembled within the Service Parts assembly area; kitting area set up as a repetitive w/c
  • High/growing volume
  • Daily demand for Next Day Air shipments domestically and internationally
  • Same components that are used by Work Cells for finished goods assembly
slide30

Success Story #2 – Service Parts

How we did it:

  • Process Change: Get inventory under control in SP locations
    • Delineate Service Parts Kitting work cell from Service Parts stock room
    • Operate the SP Kitting as a lean repetitive work cell; maintain inventory only on exclusive items
    • Define a schedule for QPS planning and repetitive picklist printing for the Kitting area
    • Define a schedule for Picklist printing for SP components
    • Develop a weekly Cycle Count schedule to cover stocking and staging locations
  • Process Change: Develop policy that any “rush” order for a replacement part or kit received by 3:00pm CST will be shipped Next Day Air (6:00pm pickup)
slide31

Success Story #2 – Service Parts Shipping

How we did it:

  • Process Change: Create locations, locations, locations to manage the flow of material to and from the Service Parts area:

STAGING 5

(From Gen Warehouse)

SERVICE

PARTS

STAGING 7

(To China)

STAGING 8

(Completed Kits)

slide32

Success Story #2 – Service Parts Shipping

How we did it:

  • Technology:
    • Eagle backflushes kits (PC’s)
    • Eagle transfers product to/from Staging locations
    • Eagle picks product to an “SO” location (handheld device)
    • Eagle performs weekly Cycle Counts of Service Parts locations (handheld device)
    • SP Open Line Items (custom browse)
      • Empowers order processors to prioritize picking/packing activity
      • Next Day Air “rush” orders are quickly identified
      • Takes advantage of Auto Refresh
    • Inventory Detail By Item Browse (custom browse)
    • Production Line Schedule Browse (custom browse)
slide34

Success Story #2 – Service Parts

Results:

  • Satisfaction of Service Agencies has improved tremendously
    • Ownership is in the hands of Line Leaders
    • Adjustments to schedules are immediately visible to Line Leaders
    • Still requires communication for “rush” orders
  • With improved efficiencies, SP is no longer overwhelmed by spikes in volume
  • Service Parts continues to grow at a solid pace
  • On-Time Shipping has improved from 82% (July 2009) to 99.3% (August 2010)
slide36

Success Story #3 – Shipping

Problem: Frequent cases of incomplete shipments, incorrect shipments, duplicate shipments, or duplicate serial numbers

Goal: To provide Shipping with tools to improve Shipping performance measurements and to proactively manage outbound Staging locations

slide37

Success Story #3 – Shipping

Responsibilities of AJA’s Shipping Team

  • Picking and shipping for food equipment FG’s
  • Picking and shipping for water filtration FG’s
  • Shipping for Controls
  • Shipping for Service Parts
  • Shipping consolidation for China container shipments
  • Manage various Staging locations
slide38

Success Story #3 – Shipping

How we did it:

  • Process Change: Separate and identify product coming into Shipping
  • Process Change: Implement controls for Picklist and Packing List management
  • Process Change: Authorize Shipping to proactively pull FG’s coming out of work cells
slide39

Success Story #3 – Shipping

How we did it:

  • Technology:
    • Eagle PIC transaction; creates a virtual “SO” location and once a serialized item is picked, it cannot be picked to another Sales Order. Allocating without formal SO Allocations
    • PIC transaction provides option for printing a Post-Pick Packing List
    • Eagle DO Shipment/DO Receipts for all DRP orders To/From China (handheld device)
    • Eagle transfers; scan the Serial # and scan the To: location (handheld device)
    • Eagle used to perform Cycle Counts of Finished Goods bin locations (handheld device)
    • Eagle IBL (Inventory By Location) used to locate product (handheld device)
    • Open Sales Order Browse (custom browse)
    • Inventory Detail By Item Browse (custom browse)
      • Check/verify inventory availability
      • Manage Staging locations
slide40

Success Story #3 – Shipping

Results:

  • Eagle PIC program provides a tracking tool for virtual “SO” locations
  • Inventory is not getting mixed up within the Shipping area because Staging locations are helping
  • Real-time picking or shipping available to all users via browses
  • Phone calls between Shipping and Customer Service have dropped by 50%
  • Shipping is clean and organized
slide41

3.2 - Inventory Detail by Item Browse

Used to monitor STAGING location (daily)

slide42

3.2 - Inventory Detail by Item Browse

Used to monitor STAGING location (daily)

slide43

Lessons Learned

  • Browse Control
    • Maintain code control; browses can easily get out of hand; think about a performance monitoring tool to identify any misbehaving browses
  • .Net Upgrade
    • Users love their Favorites and moving them to a new version is very tedious
  • Process Map Control
    • Process Map Editor In Chief oversees all process map updates
  • Operational Metrics
    • Take a Team approach to maintain consistency and to get approval on thresholds
slide45

Contact Information:

David Petzel

IT Director

A.J. Antunes & Co.

Ph: (630) 784-3435

E: [email protected]

W: www.ajantunes.com

Jim Miceli

Senior Consultant

Eagle Consulting & Development

Phone: (973) 838-5006 ext 120

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.eaglecondev.com

ad