1 / 33

Josh Emmett, Ph.D. Point Loma Nazarene University Dean McGee, M.A.Ed. Kern High School District

Investigating “Think Gold”: A Student Achievement Program to Promote Performance for High-stakes Testing. Josh Emmett, Ph.D. Point Loma Nazarene University Dean McGee, M.A.Ed. Kern High School District. Purpose of the Study.

Download Presentation

Josh Emmett, Ph.D. Point Loma Nazarene University Dean McGee, M.A.Ed. Kern High School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Investigating “Think Gold”: A Student Achievement Program to Promote Performance for High-stakes Testing Josh Emmett, Ph.D. Point Loma Nazarene University Dean McGee, M.A.Ed. Kern High School District

  2. Purpose of the Study • Discover the critical attributes of a student achievement program at one urban high school • Examine the impact of extrinsic motivation on student perceptions and behavior toward state assessments

  3. Research Questions • What were the critical attributes of the Think Gold program at West High School? • How did student achievement, as measured by state assessments, change at West High School from prior to the implementation of the Think Gold program through 2011? • How did the performance of West HS compare with the rest of the district?

  4. Theoretical Framework • Uniqueness of high schools when measuring student achievement on “high stakes” tests • “High stakes” for schools vs. students • Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic motivation • High school improvement strategies • Rewards as motivation

  5. Method • Single case study • Offers a means to answer descriptive questions • Bounded by location and circumstances Yin (2005) endorses the use of case study to provide rich descriptions that enhance awareness and analytical insight that promotes knowledge.

  6. Data Sources • Data sources • Structured interviews with stakeholders • 5 administrators, 4 Instructional Coaches • 16 randomly selected teachers (of 77) • 19 randomly selected students (from grades 9-11) • Student achievement data (CSTs) • 2009, 2010, and 2011 • West High School & District (18 high schools) • Number of students scoring “proficient” or “advanced” • Improvement of students across years • Survey data

  7. Data Analysis • Guided by Theoretical Framework • Coding of interviews • Calculations/comparisons of student achievement data • Triangulation for student survey responses

  8. The Case • Context of West High School • Large urban high school in Bakersfield, CA • Recent history of low performance • Over 70% of students live in poverty • Diverse student population (majority Latino) • Think Gold program • Employs extrinsic motivation for students to improve performance on state assessments

  9. Think Gold • The Think Gold program is a school-wide effort to improve student academic achievement. • The Think Gold program strategically validates and responds to individual student academic success by recognizing student achievement on the California Standards Tests.

  10. Why Think Gold? • Students were not coming to school intrinsically motivated to learn. • Teachers reported that students “did not care” about failing courses. • Teachers were transferring to other schools. • Professional Learning Community work began in earnest in 2007-2008. • Student performance on state mandated tests did not appear to be improving significantly.

  11. Why Think Gold? • Low School API of 593 in 2005 • Low Similar Schools Ranking of 2 • Low Freshman Promotion Rate • Low Intrinsic Motivation Levels • Low parent education levels • Low A-G completion rates • High suspension rates

  12. Why Think Gold?

  13. Direct Approach to Improve Student Motivation • The school-site leadership (teachers, administrators, and counselors) believed that the students needed to be encouraged/motivated to demonstrate their content knowledge and abilities when taking the California Standards Tests. • Think Gold is an outgrowth of the school’s decision to meet the students’ lack of motivation head-on.

  14. Think Gold Achievement Culture Core Expectations: All students are expected to take personal responsibility for their learning. This means that every student should: • Get to School Everyday • Get to Class On Time • Work Hard to Learn • Demonstrate Pride for West High

  15. Think Gold Qualification How to qualify for Gold: 1. Students must take all CSTs for assigned grade level and 2. Score proficient or advanced on two or more CSTs (Level One Goldqualification) or 3. Show a net improvement of two or more performance bands on current CSTs over the previous year’s CSTs (Level Two Gold qualification)

  16. Think Gold Recognition • Special Think Gold I.D. Card • Participation in Think Gold Activities • Access to Think Gold Spirit Awards • A Think Gold Express Lunch Pass • Level One - @ 140 days • Level Two - @ 90 days

  17. Special Think Gold Components • Level Three Gold • 8 days per school year • Performance-based qualification • Proficient or Advanced on a Common Summative Assessment (ELA, Math, Science, & Social Studies) • Hall of Fame • Top 3 Advanced scores in each CST area • Induction ceremony in September • Hall of Fame T-Shirt

  18. West High School & the Kern High School District • West High School • 2100 ADA • 63% Hispanic/Latino • 18% White • 16% African-American • 2% Asian • 1% American Indian • 70% Free/Reduced Lunch • -9.75 Z score (family income/education level calculation from Census) • Rapidly became an inner-city school when the community grew (8 new high schools since 1991) • Kern High District • 37,000 ADA (18 high schools) • 61% Hispanic/Latino • 27% White • 7% African-American • 4% Asian • 1% American Indian • 60% Free/Reduced Lunch • Other schools • Centennial (23.61 Z score) • Frontier (20.16 Z score) • Liberty (59.94 Z score) • Stockdale (62.03 Z score) • Independence (24.40 Z score)

  19. Findings • Research Question #1 Critical attributes of the Think Gold program: • The differentiated incentive system • The relative sustainability of the recognition efforts • Direct connection of outcomes for student performance to individual student decisions

  20. Findings • Research Question #2 Changes in student achievement: • Data from 2009, 2010, 2011 • Increases in Level 1 Criteria exceeded district • Increases in Level 2 Criteria exceeded district

  21. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 1 for 9th GradeKHSD West High School

  22. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 1 for 10th GradeKHSD West High School

  23. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 1 for 11th GradeKHSD West High School

  24. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 1 for Total PopulationKHSD West High School

  25. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 2 for 10th GradeKHSD West High School

  26. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 2 for 11th GradeKHSD West High School

  27. KHSD vs. West High School2009-2011Level 2 for Total PopulationKHSD West High School

  28. Key Observations • Mandated assessments have created unique circumstances for junior high and high school students that support extrinsic motivation strategies • The development of intrinsic motivation may require an extrinsic jump start for students who have low levels of internal motivation • Extrinsic motivation cannot be the only effort to improve student performance • Extrinsic motivation works best when students care about the recognition they receive – it must be more than a reward • Extrinsic motivation approaches can be counter productive if used recklessly

  29. Significance of the Study • Influence of extrinsic motivation for student achievement as an element for consideration in high school improvement • Discussion of the use of extrinsic motivation to promote student achievement • Inherent limitations • Urban context may mitigate generalizability

  30. Contact information • Josh Emmett jemmett@pointloma.edu (661) 326-6631 • Dean McGee dmcgee@khsd.k12.ca.us (661) 832-2822

  31. Survey Results

  32. Survey Results

  33. Survey Results

More Related