1 / 15

Indigo Agglomerator

Indigo Agglomerator. Reducing Particulate Emissions & Reducing Opacity. Agglomerated Particles. Agglomerator Is Like An ESP. Grounded plates Discharge electrodes Alternating arrangement High voltage energization Low pressure drop. Agglomerator Is Not Like An ESP. No collection

zwi
Download Presentation

Indigo Agglomerator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indigo Agglomerator Reducing Particulate Emissions & Reducing Opacity

  2. Agglomerated Particles

  3. Agglomerator Is Like An ESP • Grounded plates • Discharge electrodes • Alternating arrangement • High voltage energization • Low pressure drop

  4. Agglomerator Is Not Like An ESP • No collection • No hoppers • No rappers • High velocity / small size • +/- high voltage • Low power consumption

  5. THE INDIGO AGGLOMERATOR

  6. THE BENEFITS • Reduced mass emissions • Reduced visible emissions • Greater compliance safety margin • Increased choice of fuel supply • Higher tolerance for • Boiler upsets • Lost electrical sections of ESP

  7. Tarong Power Plant -Australia

  8. Mississippi PowerPlant WatsonUnit 4

  9. Mississippi Power - Plant Watson Agglomerator Lift In Place

  10. Watson ESP Outlet Tests Emerald Coal April 2004 • MEASUREMENTA PASSB PASSREDUCTION • OPACITY % 13.2 2.3 83% • PARTICULATE • Grains/Act. Cubic Ft. 0.0136 0.0082 40% • FLOW • Actual Cubic Ft/Min 443 609 406 455

  11. Watson ESP Outlet Tests Method 17West Elk Coal – April 2003 • MEASUREMENTA PASSB PASSREDUCTION • OPACITY % 15 4 73% • PARTICULATE • Grains/Act. Cubic Ft. 0.012 0.0066 45% • Milligrams/Cubic Meter 27.5 15.1 • FLOW • Actual Cubic Ft/Min 408 718 450 700 • Actual Cubic Meters/Min 11 573 12 762 • GAS TEMPERATURE • Degrees F. 276 273 • Degrees C. 136 134

  12. Drummond Sub Micron Particles

  13. OPACITY TREND AT PLANT WATSON

  14. A Precipitator B Precipitator Voltage (kV) Current (mA) Voltage (kV) Current (mA) Percentage Increase in Current Before Agglomerator 52.4 217 52.6 230 5.8% After Agglomerator 55.0 230 55.0 330 43.5% Percentage Increase 5.0% 6.0% 4.6% 43.8% INLET FIELD ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENT

  15. A Precipitator B Precipitator Voltage (kV) Current (mA) Voltage (kV) Current (mA) Percentage Increase in Current Following Installation Agglomerator 51.6 1197 52.8 1106 0.8% Before Shutdown Agglomerator 48.8 460 54.8 888 93.0% Percentage Increase -5.4% -58.1% 3.8% -19% OUTLET FIELD ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENT

More Related