270 likes | 364 Views
Learn about the key updates in the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization of 2005, focusing on job training reform, increased state flexibility, funding streams, and consolidated grants for better workforce training. Discover the benefits of WIA Plus and explore funding allocations, cost allocations, and infrastructure funds.
E N D
The Bills H.R. 27 Job Training Improvement Act Passed March 2nd S. 9 The Lifetime of Education Opportunities Act WIA is Title IV-B Introduced January 24th
Job Training ReformPresident’s Proposal • Increase State Flexibility • Reduce Overhead Costs • Increase Use of Innovation Training Accounts • Clarify Performance Expectations • Increase Role of Partners in Training Workers • Implement Personal Reemployment Accounts
Consolidated Funding Streams • WIA Adult, Dislocated Worker and Youth, and Employment Services • Provide $4 billion to Governor’s with: • less red tape • more flexibility
Reduce Administrative Overhead • Clarify administrative cost limitations • Impose stricter limitations on administrative overhead • Enforce statutory limits carefully • An estimated $300 million can be saved and used to train more workers
WIA PlusConsolidated State Grants • Governors will have the option to consolidate up to five additional federal employment and training programs administered by: • Department of Labor • Department of Education • Department of Agriculture
WIA Adult $894M WIA DW $1.1B WIA Youth $995M WP $786M Adult Education $564M Voc Rehab $2.6B Food Stamp E&T $27M Veterans $161M TAA $259M WIA Plus Total: $7.5 Billion
WIA PlusBenefits • Flexibility to design system that trains workers for jobs in the 21st century • Reduce administrative overhead • Train more workers • Achieve better results
H.R. 27Definitions • Accrued Expenditures • Administrative Costs
Administrative Cost Limit • State Level - 5% • Local Level - 10%
Infrastructure Funds • State Board • Criteria for Allocation • Oversight of Fund Use • Approaches to Facilitate One-Stop Cost Allocation • State Plan • Method for Determining Partner Contributions • Formula for Allocating to Local Areas
Infrastructure Funds • Governor Determines Partner Portions • Proportionate Use of One-Stop Centers • Funds Available for Administration Costs • Excludes Native American Programs • Share Determined Locally • Under Cost Allocation/Resource Sharing & MOU
Infrastructure Costs • Non-personnel costs only • Includes • Rental costs of the facilities • Utilities and maintenance • Equipment, including adaptive technology • Strategic planning activities • Common outreach activities
Local Cost Allocation & Resource Sharing • Still Required • To Pay for: • Excess Infrastructure Costs • Other Common Costs • Costs for Provision of Core Services
Allotments&Allocations • Multi-Part Formulae • Prior Funding Streams • Prior Funding Formulae • Current Level of Funding
CETA • Secretary’s Reserve - 10% • 75% - National Dislocated Worker Grants • 20% - Demonstration Projects • 5% - to Provide Technical Assistance • State Allotments - 90% • ¼ of 1% - for Outlying Areas • 26% - W-P based Formulae • 74% - Adult & DW based Formulae
Wagner-Peyserportion • Up to Prior Year Amount Available • Prior year allotment percentage to each State • Excess Amounts Available • Relative Number of Individuals in the Civilian Labor Force in State compared to All States • No State receives less than 3/10 of 1% of Excess
WIA Adult & Dislocated Workerportion • 60% - Relative # Unemployed in State • 25% - Relative Excess # Unemployed • 15% - Relative # Disadvantaged Adults
State Reserve50% of Consolidated Funds • 50% - Support Provision of Core Services • Distributed to Local Areas using Formula • Objective & Geographically Equitable • Factors may include: • # Certified Centers • Population Served by Centers • Performance of Centers • May be used by State to Employ State Staff in Local Areas to Provide such Services
State Reserve50% of Consolidated Funds • Remaining 50% or less • Rapid Response [no longer 25%] • Traditional • Additional Assistance • Other Statewide Activities • No longer Required and Other • Many kept • Some combined • Some new
Local Allocations • 85% - Statutory Formula • 60% - Relative # Unemployed • 25% - Relative Excess # Unemployed • 15% - Relative # Disadvantaged Adulets • 15% - Governor’s Discretionary Formula • Developed in Consultation with State Board • Objective and Geographically Equitable • May include Demographic & Economic Factors
Reallotment&Reallocation • Based on Unexpended Balance • Amount in excess of 30% • Determined using Reported Accrued Expenditures
S. 9 • Definitions • Accrued Expenditures • Administrative Costs • Not Addressed??? • Separate funding streams • Some Formula Changes • Reallotment & Reallocation
Infrastructure Funds • Local Option • Maintain current Cost Allocation & Resource Sharing Methodology with MOU • Failure mandates use of State Process • Use State Infrastructure Funding Process • State Process • Includes Caps on different Programs • WIA & W-P = 3% • Most Others = 1 ½ % • VocRehab = increasing amounts ¾% - 1 ½%
Real Property • Federal Equity transferred to States • Property still to be used for UI & W-P • Disposition Options remain the same • Disposition Proceeds used for UI & W-P • No More Amortization with UI & W-P $$s