1 / 32

Higher Education Reauthorization

Higher Education Reauthorization. A NASSGAP Perspective By Lisa Fuller & Chas Treadwell Co-chairs, NASSGAP Federal Relations Committee NASSGAP Fall 2002 Conference. Reauthorization-What Is It?. A type of legal plea bargaining (think Enron, WorldCom, etc.)

gaurav
Download Presentation

Higher Education Reauthorization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HigherEducation Reauthorization A NASSGAP Perspective By Lisa Fuller & Chas Treadwell Co-chairs, NASSGAP Federal Relations Committee NASSGAP Fall 2002 Conference

  2. Reauthorization-What Is It? • A type of legal plea bargaining (think Enron, WorldCom, etc.) • Something Bob Villa shows you on “This Old House” • Renewal of all federal higher education programs • All of the above

  3. Why Is There a “Reauthorization”? • Job security for 10,000 bureaucrats and lobbyists • The moons of Jupiter have aligned with Halley’s Comet • Without it, every federal higher education program ceases to exist October 1, 2003

  4. When Is Reauthorization? • Every so often, when the moons of Jupiter… • Way too often- how else can those 10,000 lobbyists defend their billings? • Every 5-6 years, depending on…

  5. What Factors Will Influence Reauthorization? • Federal deficit spending • State revenue shortfalls • Rising college costs • Reduced Pell Grant purchasing power • Continuing “gaps” in college participation • Growth in merit aid • Demographics

  6. Who Are The Players? • House and Senate authorizing subcommittees/committees • Higher education associations • U.S. Department of Education(ED), OMB, the White House • All other interested parties in the western world

  7. What Is The Likely Timeline? Possible scenarios: • Fall 2002- House subcommittee Web site w/ December 31,2002 deadline for initial input of issues/suggestions • Spring 2003-ED releases its FY 2004 budget and reauthorization recommendations; congressional hearings • Summer 2003-possible House draft bill

  8. 1998 NASSGAP Recommendations- A Look At The Past • LEAP: two-tiered, 2-1 @ $75 million trigger • NEISP: expand • Paul Douglas: transfer tracking to ED; allow admin. retention from collections; cancel repayment for students curtailed

  9. 1998 NASSGAP Recommendations (Cont’d.) • FAFSA: state-specific FOTW • Tax Policy: expand federal tax benefits for saving plans, loan interest, employer aid; state education IRAs • Need Assessment: create commission

  10. 1998 NASSGAP Recommendations (Cont’d.) • Campus based: increase transfer flexibility; simplify refunds • Regulations: neg reg for all; 120 day review ; fewer regs • Loans: refinance interactivity w/FFEL/FDSL; elim 30 day disbursement for low default colleges; elim single term multi disbursements; ED support for both FFEL & FDSL; use FAFSA as loan app

  11. What Are The Other Players Recommending for 2003 Reauthorization?LEAP/SLEAP (formerly SSIG): • Continue LEAP and increase funding

  12. Preliminary 2003 Reauthorization Recommendations From Others • entitlement • front load • add bonus grant (options) • raise maximum/minimum Pell Grants:

  13. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • keep toll-free number; • remove 25% incarcerated student limit; • require FAFSA ID only for paid preparers; • eliminate taxation of student aid. General Provisions:

  14. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • ATB definition expansion– include students completing 6 college credits with at least “C” grade; • Require ED, not colleges, to provide students w/state aid info; • Eliminate campus voter registration material distribution; • Eliminate drug-related student eligibility suspension.

  15. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • require ED/IRS automated verification demo by 2004 with all by 2007; • continue but evaluate Quality Assurance and Experimental Sites; • 25% transfer among campus-based programs; • $500 overaward tolerance

  16. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • legal guardian=parent • exclude EIC • $1,000 asset protection for students • TANF check-off box on FAFSA • Eliminate SNT and automatic zero EFC Federal Methodology:

  17. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • 529 plan values= asset of parent • Exclude LEAP from Title IV refund formula • FAO override of return of funds • assess VA as resource @ 50% • adjust refund policy: > 50% attendance = 100% of earned aid

  18. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • Raise loan limits to $7,000 for all UG • Ditto for grads to $10,000(sub) & $15,000(unsub) • Colleges can approve lower limits for classes of students Loans:

  19. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • Option: raise limits only for co-signers • Variable grace periods via economic conditions • Retain single holder consolidation rule • Repayment flexibility, but limit gov’t subsidy to 15 years

  20. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • Limit lender/guarantor fiscal gains • ED pays G-fee to GA for borrower--have borrower pay G-fee upon graduation/leaving • Eliminate/reduce O-fee • Equalize terms/conditions/loan forgiveness

  21. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • Require GAs and lenders (not colleges) to conduct all entrance/exit counseling • Allow GAs to collect FDSL/Perkins defaults; lenders buy FDSL and Perkins loans • Lengthen cohort default rate period • Permit lenders to use undocumented forbearance • GA financing formula tweaks

  22. Preliminary Reauthorization Recommendations From Others (Cont’d.) • Make GU Partnerships part of TRIO w/ experience points and loss of single cohort focus • Insert a ceiling on GU professional development GEAR UP program:

  23. FED UP Technical Amendments Bill • House bill did not pass; Senate bill introduced • Contains : • --6th year for GEAR UP; • --LEAP out of refunds; • --30 day and single term disbursement rules; • --clarify home schooled/college aid eligibility; • --forbearance flexibility for lenders; • -- new ED law scholarship

  24. NASSGAP “Hot Buttons” for Current Reauthorization • “Let Our LEAP Grow”-- raise maximum awards/authorized funding • “Take Our Douglas, Please!”-- transfer collections to ED • “If You Pay It, They Will Come”-- Allow Free state FOTW link

  25. Current NASSGAP “Hot Buttons” (Cont’d.) • “We’ve Only Just Begun- GEAR UP” • raise GEAR UP authorized funding; • keep GEAR UP current structure; • decouple GEAR UP scholarship minimum award from Pell maximum

  26. Other NASSGAP Member Ideas • Add spouse SSN to FAFSA to help verification • Reduce student contribution rates in FM • Add state grant agencies to neg reg groups in law

  27. Other NASSGAP Member Ideas (Cont’d.) • Provide aid eligibility to students taking course from both 4yr & 2yr colleges

  28. Other NASSGAP Member Ideas (Cont’d.) • O-fee elimination; • increase limits by class year; • repayment extensions; • restore 30 day/multiple disbursement waiver for low default colleges Loans:

  29. Next Steps • Win the Powerball Mega-Lottery and share it with NASSGAP members so we can watch reauthorization from the comfort of our own island in the South Pacific • Absent that…

  30. Next Steps (Cont’d.) • Federal Relations Committee drafts NASSGAP prelim paper for member review/exec committee approval; recommendations submitted as preliminary to FED UP Web site by 12/31/02 • NASSGAP comments on state-related recommendations made by others

  31. Next Steps (Cont’d.) • NASSGAP solicits invitations for congressional testimony • NASSGAP joins alliances with similar objectives

  32. Your Questions/Comments? THANK YOU!!

More Related