Enhancing Educational Outcomes for Children in Foster Care Through Data Sharing
300 likes | 419 Views
This presentation discusses the critical role of data collection and sharing in improving educational outcomes for children in foster care. It highlights the importance of both statistical and student-level data in identifying systemic issues, informing policy decisions, and targeting resources effectively. By understanding the educational challenges faced by these children, such as lower graduation rates and increased absenteeism, stakeholders can implement trauma-informed interventions and enhance collaboration across child welfare and education systems to support the academic success of youth in care.
Enhancing Educational Outcomes for Children in Foster Care Through Data Sharing
E N D
Presentation Transcript
DATA POWER: COLLECTING AND SHARING EDUCATION AND CHILD WELFARE INFORMATION TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE LCFCE Conference Call August 13, 2008
“Data” Defined • Data = Information [Education] • Statistical & Student Level • Statistical Level – national/subcategories • Not personally identifiable • Student Level - individual • Education Records • Personally identifiable • Aggregate = All Children (national/state) • Disaggregate = Subset (kids in care)
Why is Data Important:Statistical Level • Indentify systemic problems • Develop effective policies & priorities • Reduce barriers to educational success • Increase accountability • Substantiate need for funding • Increase and target $$ • Educate everyone and facilitate collaboration among multiple systems • Educate agencies about the children they serve
Why Is Data ImportantStudent Level • Individual educational needs of child • Critical to well being • Triggers prompt intervention • Informs other decisions (e.g., placement and transition goals) • Enhances and improves delivery of services
Data Disconnect • Limited Information Available • No National Statistics • Few Statewide Studies • Limited Regional/Local Studies • However, those studies consistently indicate that children in care are educationally at risk and in crisis
What We Know Educational CRISIS • Only one-third of students in substitute care receive a regular diploma within four years; • Twice as likely to drop out; • 2-4 times as many youth in out-of home care have repeated grades compared to their non-foster care peers; • Score significantly below their peers on standardized tests, have lower reading levels and lower grades in core academic subjects • Greater absenteeism
What We Need To Know • Beyond geographic snapshots • Extent of the problem • Longitudinal data tracking children over time • Statistically significant factors contributing to educational failure • Eg., multiple school changes; type of placement; length of stay; discipline rates • What is working • Trauma informed curriculum; positive behavioral supports
What is Being Collected, By Whom and to What End? Education andChild Welfare: • What is the purpose of the data collection? • Where/how is the information maintained? • How is it currently being used? • What data relates to the educational outcomes of children in care? • How could it be revised/expanded to improve educational outcomes for children in care? • How could it be shared across systems?
Identifying Children in Care • Only Child Welfare Knows • Possible Solutions: • Residency Codes: Enrollment status • Student Identification Numbers: Child welfare maintains Student ID Nos. in case files & supplies list to education • Data Matching: Match Name/DOB with Education’s Unique Student Identifier
What is Education Collecting • NCLB: No Child Left Behind Act . . . . • Collects Critical Information in ALL States • Electronically Maintained • Student Identification Numbers
No Child Left Behind Act • Passed in 2002; reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. • Purpose: Improve educational performance and eliminate the achievement gap between groups of students. Requires States to implement accountability systems at the State, school district and school level.
Understanding NCLB • Students attending Title I schools designated “in need of improvement” for two consecutive years have opportunity to transfer to new school in the same district • Low income students attending Title I schools designated as failing for at least three of four prior years, must receive “supplemental educational services” • Students who attend persistently dangerous schools, or who have been victimized by school violence, must be allowed to transfer to a safer school in the district
What Data Does Education Collect Under NCLB? • Attendance: Days “absent without excuse” and days enrolledin school • School Enrollment: Tracks student mobility, enrollment delays & grade level designation at time of enrollment • Academic Progress* Standardized scores • Special Education* Disability & Services • Program Template: Participation in remedial & other programs (Title I, HS) • * = May be separate State data system
Student Template Data • Gender • Race/Ethnicity • Student Status – Court placed “or” alt ed. • Economic status (Free/Reduced Lunch Program) • Educationally Disadvantaged under Career and Technical Education programs: • Plan 504 Indicator • LEP Participation/English Proficiency/Language Breakdown/Language/ Home Language Code • Courses – Advanced courses only • Grade retention • Expected Graduation, Graduation Status Code & Type of Diploma • Expected Post Graduate Activity
What Could Education Collect • Prompt Enrollment (FL example) • Truancy Rates under State Law • School Performance (San Diego) • Special Education Data - Expanded • Academic Progress – Expanded • Program Data – Vocational & ESY • Course Enrollment • Credit Transfers • Discipline • Higher Ed Data
Longitudinal Data Under NCLB • NCLB strongly endorses the use of longitudinal data: • “Each State may incorporate the data from assessments into longitudinal data systems that link student test scores, length of enrollment and graduation records over time.” Title I Part A Sec. 111(b)3(B) • U.S. Dept. of Ed provides funding to states to develop systems to link records over time OR to identify best educational practices
NCLB State Data Collection • 45 states have developed a statewide “student identifier” that connects student-specific data across key databases and across years. • 18 states have data systems which align PreK-12 and post-secondary education systems to track students through their post-secondary careers.
What’ s In YOUR State • Data Quality Campaign • http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/survey_results/index.cfm • Education Commission of the States • http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=913
What Does Child Welfare Collect • Title IV-E of the Social Security Act 42 U.S.C.A. 675(1)(C) & (5)(D) Requires that child welfare agency case plans include the most recent information available regarding education records of child • Duty to review and update • Duty to supply to every foster parent/provider • Must consider education in making placement decisions
Child & Family Service Reviews42 U.S.C.A. 1320a-2a • Well-Being Outcome 2, states: “Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs.” • 34 states NOT is substantial conformity • Availability of school records is a factor in determining whether a state child welfare agency is meeting the educational needs of a child
AFCARS (Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System) • 45 C.F.R. 1355.40 • Semi-annual • Currently, only ONE question of 66 even mentions education (re visual impairment) • Proposed Amendments to AFCARS: • Learning or developmental disability • Special education • Repeated Grade: if so, how many
What Could Child Welfare Collect • Whether living placement resulted in school change & re-enrollments • Special Ed: early intervention; evaluations requested/conducted; services delivered as child moves; type of learning/devp’l disability • Early ChildhoodEducation Headstart/other programs: what age & how long
What Could Child Welfare Collect • Type of educational placement: public school, on-ground school, alternative education • School completion element: Including WHY child dropped out • Transition Readiness: level of education, life skills training, plans
Sharing Data & Information Across Systems Real and Perceived Barriers: • Child Welfare Laws:CAPTA 42 U.S.C. 5106 (A)(B)(2) & (A)(B)(A) • State laws must protect confidentiality of child welfare records & specify when and with whom records may be shared • State statues may authorize info. sharing • Permits sharing of info. with gov’t agency to protect child from abuse/neglect
Education Laws: FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act 20 U.S.C. § 1233g; 34 CFR Part 99 • Purpose: to protect privacy interests of parents and students regarding the students’ education records • Parent’s right to share or refuse to share records • Exceptions to parental consent
When Can Education Records Be Shared with Child Welfare: • Is It An Education Record? • Directory Information? • If It Qualifies: • Parent consents • Parental Consent Form (time of placement) • Child Welfare Agency may meet FERPA definition of parent (acting in place of parent) • State law authorizing disclosure • OR FERPA Exceptions to consent
FERPA Exceptions to Consent: • Research • “Specifically authorized by Federal Law” • Officials and authorities indicated by state statute for purposes of improving JJ system’s ability to serve the student • Appropriate persons when release of information is needed to comply with judicial order or subpoena
Sharing Information To Improve Educational Outcomes • Education -> Child Welfare • Child Welfare –>Ed • Joint Research • Common Data System Accessed by Multiple Agencies (with varying levels of accessibility)
Examples of Data Collection & Information Sharing • Florida Department of Education • Utah • California • Los Angeles Education Coordinating Council • San Diego • Pennsylvania • Your State Here
Contact Information Education Law Center www.elc-pa.org Maura McInerney mcinerney@elc-pa.org